The Resurgence of “All-Serbism” and the Intensification of European Integration Stagnation

Main Article Content

Xinhao Fu

Keywords

All-Serbism, European integration, European Union, Western Balkans

Abstract

Taking the resurgence of All-Serbism as a point of departure, this article examines how it systematically impedes the extension of European integration into the Western Balkans through three interrelated pathways: historical legacies, political mobilization, institutional decoupling, and external linkages. Combining historical narrative and policy analysis, the study traces key developments since the disintegration of Yugoslavia-including the 2024 All-Serb Assembly in Belgrade-and evaluates the limitations of the EU’s conditionality instruments in addressing the revival of nationalism. The findings indicate three main patterns. First, All-Serbism has evolved from a domestic political discourse into a transnational identity and geopolitical strategy, becoming a structural force in the region. Second, the EU’s traditional mode of normative projection has lost efficacy in the face of security anxieties and sovereignty-centered politics, while internal Euroscepticism and decision-making fragmentation have further exacerbated enlargement fatigue. Third, external powers-particularly Russia-have amplified this ideology through security cooperation and discursive support. In response, the article argues that the EU should reconstruct its accession mechanism around a dual security-governance framework, implementing flexible and phased compliance, differentiated diplomacy, and socially embedded public diplomacy to enhance institutional resilience and weaken the societal roots of nationalism. The conclusion contends that unless the EU achieves coordinated reforms across institutional, diplomatic, and identity dimensions, the prospect of integrating the Western Balkans will remain constrained by nationalism and geopolitical competition. Future research should further explore the interplay among All-Serbism, Pan-Slavic identity, Russo-European rivalry, and the EU’s internal political cycles.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

  • Axyonova, V. and Kartsonaki, A. (2025). The European Union’s normalisation policies for Kosovo: contributing to a durable peace? Ethnopolitics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 461-478.
  • Boric, F. (2025a). International Aspects of the Dodik Verdict and the Law in the RS Entity. Bosnia and Herzegovina external relations briefing (BH), no. 3, pp. 1-10.
  • Boric, F. (2025b). Verdict for Dodik: A New Reality in BiH. Bosnia and Herzegovina political briefing (MK), no. 3, pp. 1-11.
  • Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2018). From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 83-108.
  • BPRG (2017). Kosovo and Serbia: Status and Dialogue, Serbia, Belgrade: Belgrade Policy Research Group.
  • Council of the European Union (2025). Hague Defense Investment Plan, Brussels: Council of the European Union.
  • European Commission (2025). Enlargement Report 2025, Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Union (2013). Brussels Agreement between Serbia and Kosovo, 19 April 2013, Brussels: European External Action Service.
  • Gao, F. (2006). Nationalism was a major internal cause of the disintegration of Yugoslavia: My final assessment of Milosevic. Probe, no. 6, pp. 57-64.
  • Gao, G. (2024). The boundaries of diverse integration in the EU: A case study based on the accession of central and eastern european countries. The Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 9-33,5.
  • Janković, S. (2019). NATO road to Serbia: why 1999? David vs. Goliath: NATO war against Yugoslavia and its implications. Belgrade: Institute for International Politics and Economics (Институт за међународну политику и привреду), pp. 155-176.
  • Jones, E., Kelemen, R. D. and Meunier, S. (2016). Failing forward? The Euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration. Comparative political studies, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1010-1034.
  • Koneska, C., Huskić, A. and Krasniqi, G. (2023). Macedonia, bosnia and kosovo: contested statehood and the EU. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 173-191.
  • Ljubomirović, A. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the “Serbian World” and “Greater Serbia” Concepts. Kultura Polisa, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 122-151.
  • Pavić, A. (2025). Strategic pragmaticity as a factor in achieving serbia’s national interests. Srpska politička misao, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 25-49.
  • Radio Television Serbia (2024).The first All-Serbs Assembly "One nation, one assembly - Serbia and Srpska" [Online]. Available: https://www.rts.rs/lat/tv/rts1/5461637/prvi-svesrpski-sabor-jedan-narod-jedan-sabor---srbija-i-srpska.html [Accessed September 5, 2025].
  • Rakovic, A. (2022). Serbism and Orthodoxness History, Region, Politics Ⅱ, Belgrade: Institute za Evropske Studije.
  • Stojanovic, D. (2024).Serbs rally in Belgrade with calls for unity in a volatile region as Russia gives its support [Online]. Available: https://apnews.com/article/serbia-bosnia-unity-russia-f1cbdaa2756a4aa4efcde77386435f7a [Accessed September 5, 2025].
  • Stojković, D. and Golubović, M. (2025). The impact of the Russian invasion on Ukraine on neutrality in Europe: The case of Sweden, Finland, Austria and Serbia. Medjunarodni problemi, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 63-89.