Spaced Repetition and Retrieval Practice: Efficient Learning Mechanisms from a Cognitive Psychology Perspective and Their Empowerment by AI

Main Article Content

Mengqi Huang

Keywords

spaced repetition, cognitive psychology, adaptive learning systems

Abstract

This paper explores two efficient learning strategies-spaced repetition and retrieval practice-from the perspective of cognitive psychology, and examines their integration with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. It first establishes the theoretical foundation by elaborating on the human memory processes (encoding, storage, retrieval), Ebbinghaus’s forgetting curve, the spacing effect, and the retrieval practice effect, clarifying how these strategies align with the brain’s memory mechanisms. The paper then analyzes the scientific principles of spaced repetition, including its reliance on memory consolidation theory and desirable difficulty theory, as well as the evolution of interval arrangement algorithms from fixed-interval models, e.g., Leitner System, to modern data-driven and deep learning-based systems, e.g., SSP-MMC, LSTM-HLR. For retrieval practice, it compares the cognitive differences between active retrieval and passive review, evaluates the effectiveness of different retrieval forms (free recall, fill-in-the-blank, multiple-choice), and discusses its application in teaching. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the synergistic effect of combining spaced repetition and retrieval practice (forming “spaced retrieval”). And how AI enhances these strategies-adaptive learning systems use large-scale memory data and machine learning to personalize review plans, optimize retrieval difficulty, and improve learning efficiency. Finally, the paper identifies practical challenges, e.g., initial cognitive load, personalized calibration, and proposes optimization strategies, while outlining future directions for AI-integrated learning systems. Empirical evidence throughout the paper confirms that these strategies significantly boost long-term knowledge retention compared to traditional learning methods.

Abstract 178 | PDF Downloads 85

References

  • Adesope, O. O., (2017). Meta-analysis of retrieval practice effects on memory retention. Educational Psychology Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 537-571.
  • Agarwal, P. K. and Roediger, H. L., (2018). Retrieval practice in the classroom: Long-term benefits and applications. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 367-374.
  • Carpenter, S. K., (2020). The effects of retrieval practice form on memory retention: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 146, no. 12, pp. 1084-1111.
  • Ebbinghaus, H., (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology, Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Fine Books.
  • Gervais, M. P. and Baker, R. S., (2021). Machine learning-driven adaptive spaced repetition systems: Reducing review time while improving retention. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 112-125.
  • Pan, S. C. and Rickard, T. C., (2018). Spaced retrieval practice: A meta-analysis of its effects on memory retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Genera, vol. 147, no. 11, pp. 1641-1664.
  • Roediger, H. L. and Abel, M., (2015). The retrieval practice effect: Theories and applications. Current Directions in Psychological Science,, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 187-193.
  • Smith, M. A. and Karpicke, J. D., (2021). Digital flashcards for retrieval practice: Effects on delayed test performance in college students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 157-175.

Similar Articles

11-18 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.