The Algorithm-Mediated Inequality Regime in Hiring: A Systematic Review and Integrative Framework

Main Article Content

Nuoheng Wang
University of Nottingham Ningbo, Nottingham University Business School, Ningbo 315100, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70267/cai.v3n4.146162

Keywords

algorithmic bias, algorithmic fairness, AI hiring, inequality regime, systematic review

Abstract

AI-driven hiring has become widespread, yet concerns about fairness persist. Technical and behavioral research have evolved in largely disconnected streams. This paper conducts a systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizing 50 studies to propose an “algorithm-mediated inequality regime” framework that integrates technical analyses of bias, applicant fairness perceptions, and ethical critiques. The framework captures how algorithmic hiring systems actively produce and legitimize inequality. Our findings reveal that data bias, algorithmic bias and human-in-loop bias map respectively onto Acker’s mechanisms of invisibility, legitimation, and control, forming a self-reinforcing cycle. Existing governance strategies, including technical fixes, organizational oversight, and legal-institutional mandates, operate within the prevailing inequality regime and fail to address underlying power asymmetries. The study extends organizational inequality theory into algorithmic contexts and offers practitioners a systemic diagnostic tool for auditing and reforming AI-enabled hiring.

Abstract 6 | PDF Downloads 2

References

  • [1] Dastin, J. (2018, October 10). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters.
  • [2] Chen, J., Kallus, N., Mao, X., Svacha, G., & Udell, M. (2019). Fairness under unawareness: Assessing disparity when protected class is unobserved. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT)* (pp. 339–348). ACM.
  • [3] Lavanchy, M., Reichert, P., Narayanan, J., & Savani, K. (2023). Applicants’ fairness perceptions of algorithm driven hiring procedures. Journal of Business Ethics.
  • [4] Mori, M., Sassetti, S., Cavaliere, V., & Bonti, M. (2024). A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in recruiting and selection: A matter of ethics. Personnel Review.
  • [5] Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.
  • [6] Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3), 330–347.
  • [7] Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671–732.
  • [8] Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT)* (pp. 149–159). PMLR.
  • [9] Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158.
  • [10] Amrute, S. (2019). Of techno ethics and techno affects. Feminist Review, 123(1), 56–73.
  • [11] Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
  • [12] Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29.
  • [13] Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT)* (pp. 59–68). ACM.
  • [14] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
  • [15] Parviainen, H. (2024). Challenges of direct discrimination in algorithmic recruitment: Insuperable or not? International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations.
  • [16] Tilmes, N. (2022). Disability, fairness, and algorithmic bias in AI recruitment. Ethics and Information Technology.
  • [17] Carter, C. (2024). Why the algorithmic recruiter discriminates: The causal challenges of data driven discrimination. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law.
  • [18] Trautwein, Y., Zechiel, F., Coussement, K., Meire, M., & Büttgen, M. (2025). Opening the ‘black box’ of HRM algorithmic biases – How hiring practices induce discrimination on freelancing platforms. Journal of Business Research.
  • [19] Sony, M. M. A. A. M., Amin, M. B., Ashraf, A., Islam, K. M. A., Debnath, N. C., & Debnath, G. C. (2025). Bias in AI driven HRM systems: Investigating discrimination risks embedded in AI recruitment tools and HR analytics. Social Sciences and Humanities Open.
  • [20] Zheng, F., Zhao, C. G., Usman, M., & Poulova, P. (2024). From bias to brilliance: The impact of artificial intelligence usage on recruitment biases in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
  • [21] Alon Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2023). Human–AI interactions in public sector decision making: “Automation bias” and “selective adherence” to algorithmic advice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 153–169.
  • [22] Rosenthal von der Pütten, A. M., & Sach, A. (2024). Michael is better than Mehmet: Exploring the perils of algorithmic biases and selective adherence to advice from automated decision support systems in hiring. Frontiers in Psychology.
  • [23] Alexander III, L., Song, Q. C., Hickman, L., & Shin, H. J. (2025). Sourcing algorithms: Rethinking fairness in hiring in the era of algorithmic recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment.
  • [24] Larsson, S., White, J. M., & Bogusz, C. I. (2024). The artificial recruiter: Risks of discrimination in employers’ use of AI and automated decision making. Social Inclusion.
  • [25] Seppälä, P., & Małecka, M. (2024). AI and discriminative decisions in recruitment: Challenging the core assumptions. Big Data & Society.
  • [26] Haque, A. (2025). AI is hiring you: Algorithmic power, ethical risks, and the future of recruitment. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior.
  • [27] Koch Bayram, I. F., Kaibel, C., Biemann, T., & Triana, M. D. (2023). Applicants’ experiences with discrimination explain their reactions to algorithms in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment.
  • [28] Ochmann, J., Michels, L., Tiefenbeck, V., Maier, C., & Laumer, S. (2024). Perceived algorithmic fairness: An empirical study of transparency and anthropomorphism in algorithmic recruiting. Information Systems Journal.
  • [29] Babaee, A., & Shank, D. B. (2025). Trust and procedural justice mediate the effects of AI hiring on organizational attraction and intent to apply. Discover Artificial Intelligence.
  • [30] Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2025). Exploring cultural differences in AI based interviews: Innovativeness and justice perceptions among job applicants in the United States and South Korea. Human Resource Management.
  • [31] Feldkamp, T., Langer, M., Wies, L., & König, C. J. (2024). Justice, trust, and moral judgements when personnel selection is supported by algorithms. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.
  • [32] Hosain, M. S., Amin, M. B., Debnath, G. C., & Rahaman, M. A. (2025). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the hiring process: Job applicants’ perceptions of procedural justice. Computers in Human Behavior Reports.
  • [33] Yu, J., Ma, Z., & Zhu, L. (2025). The configurational effects of artificial intelligence based hiring decisions on applicants’ justice perception and organisational commitment. Information Technology and People.
  • [34] Malin, C., Fleiss, J., Ortlieb, R., & Thalmann, S. (2025). Rejected by an AI? Comparing job applicants’ fairness perceptions of artificial intelligence and humans in personnel selection. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.
  • [35] Alsubaie, N., & Aleisa, N. (2025). Mitigating bias in AI model using explainable AI in terms of hiring process in the industry. IEEE Access.
  • [36] Hofeditz, L., Clausen, S., Riess, A., Mirbabaie, M., & Stieglitz, S. (2022). Applying XAI to an AI based system for candidate management to mitigate bias and discrimination in hiring. Electronic Markets.
  • [37] Fabris, A., Wska, N. B., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Var, J. S., Borgesius, F. Z., & Biega, A. J. (2024). Fairness and bias in algorithmic hiring: A multidisciplinary survey. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology.
  • [38] Kupfer, C., Prassl, R., Fleiß, J., Malin, C., Thalmann, S., & Kubicek, B. (2023). Check the box! How to deal with automation bias in AI based personnel selection. Frontiers in Psychology.
  • [39] Soleimani, M., Intezari, A., & Pauleen, D. J. (2022). Mitigating cognitive biases in developing AI assisted recruitment systems: A knowledge sharing approach. International Journal of Knowledge Management.
  • [40] Cruz, I. F. (2024). How process experts enable and constrain fairness in AI driven hiring. International Journal of Communication.
  • [41] Hauer, M. P., Kevekordes, J., & Haeri, M. A. (2021). Legal perspective on possible fairness measures – A legal discussion using the example of hiring decisions. Computer Law and Security Review.
  • [42] Sipior, J. C., Ward, B. T., Rusinko, C. A., & Lombardi, D. R. (2024). Bias in using AI for recruiting: Legal considerations. Information Systems Management.
  • [43] Rigotti, C., & Fosch Villaronga, E. (2024). Fairness, AI & recruitment. Computer Law and Security Review.
  • [44] Delecraz, S., Eltarr, L., Becuwe, M., Bouxin, H., Boutin, N., & Oullier, O. (2022). Responsible artificial intelligence in human resources technology: An innovative inclusive and fair by design matching algorithm for job recruitment purposes. Journal of Responsible Technology, 11, 100041.
  • [45] Tyagi, S., Qian, W., Xie, J., & Andrews, R. (2024). Enhancing gender equity in resume job matching via debiasing assisted deep generative model and gender weighted sampling. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights.
  • [46] Kubiak, E., Efremova, M. I., Baron, S., & Frasca, K. J. (2023). Gender equity in hiring: Examining the effectiveness of a personality based algorithm. Frontiers in Psychology.
  • [47] Yarger, L., Payton, F. C., & Neupane, B. (2020). Algorithmic equity in the hiring of underrepresented IT job candidates. Online Information Review, 44(2), 383–395.
  • [48] Iftikhar, A., Mohammad, S. I., Alqudah, M. N., Al Adwan, A. S., Vasudevan, A., Ali, I., & Farhan, M. (2025). Evaluating inclusivity and fairness of AI recruitment tools for hiring people with disabilities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Data and Metadata.
  • [49] Fabeyo, S. (2025). Ensuring ADA compliance in AI hiring: Review, analysis, and disability discrimination framework. Issues in Information Systems.
  • [50] Ip, E. (2025). Fair AI in hiring: Experimental evidence on how biased hiring algorithms and different debiasing methods affect the quality and diversity of applicants. Behavioral Science and Policy.
  • [51] Mihaljević, H., Müller, I., Dill, K., Yollu Tok, A., & von Grafenstein, M. (2024). More or less discrimination? Practical feasibility of fairness auditing of technologies for personnel selection. AI & Society.
  • [52] Doverspike, D., Arthur, W., Jr., & Miguel, R. (2025). Legal, professional, and ethical issues in identifying bias in artificial intelligence based personnel selection. Consulting Psychology Journal.
  • [53] Müller, I., Dill, K., & Mihaljevic, H. (2025). Practical perspectives on fairness in technology aided personnel selection. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction.
  • [54] Köchling, A., Riazy, S., Wehner, M. C., & Simbeck, K. (2021). Highly accurate, but still discriminatory: A fairness evaluation of algorithmic video analysis in the recruitment context. Business & Information Systems Engineering.
  • [55] Koivunen, S., Sahlgren, O., Ala Luopa, S., & Olsson, T. (2023). Pitfalls and tensions in digitalizing talent acquisition: An analysis of HRM professionals’ considerations related to digital ethics. Interacting with Computers.
  • [56] Chen, A. H., Han, F. F., Zhang, X. Y., & Lu, Y. B. (2025). Cracking the AI recruitment code: Striving for transparency in finding the right person job fit. Information & Management.
  • [57] Soleimani, M., Intezari, A., Arrowsmith, J., Pauleen, D. J., & Taskin, N. (2025). Reducing AI bias in recruitment and selection: An integrative grounded approach. International Journal of Human Resource Management.
  • [58] Noble, S. M., Foster, L. L., & Craig, S. B. (2021). The procedural and interpersonal justice of automated application and resume screening. International Journal of Selection and Assessment.
  • [59] Njoto, S., Cheong, M., Frermann, L., & Ruppanner, L. (2025). Bias and discrimination against women and parents in semi automated hiring systems. New Technology, Work and Employment.
  • [60] Rao, S. B. A., & Zhao, T. T. (2025). Ethical AI in HR: A case study of tech hiring. Journal of Computer Information Systems.
  • [61] Gupta, A., & Mishra, M. (2022). Ethical concerns while using artificial intelligence in recruitment of employees. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(2), 6–11.
  • [62] Sheard, N. (2025). Algorithm facilitated discrimination: A socio legal study of the use by employers of artificial intelligence hiring systems. Journal of Law and Society.
  • [63] Ringelband, O., & Warneke, C. (2025). Some ethical and legal issues in using artificial intelligence in personnel selection. Consulting Psychology Journal.
  • [64] Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research.
  • [65] Burn, I., Button, P., Corella, L. M., & Neumark, D. (2022). Does ageist language in job ads predict age discrimination in hiring? Journal of Labor Economics.

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published
Oct 1, 2026
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026)
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Wang, N. (2026). The Algorithm-Mediated Inequality Regime in Hiring: A Systematic Review and Integrative Framework. Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 3(4), 146-162. https://doi.org/10.70267/cai.v3n4.146162