Research Progress in Machine-Learning-Based Fault Diagnosis for Mechanical Equipment

Main Article Content

Yanlin Chen

Keywords

fault diagnosis, machine learning, deep learning, mechanical equipment, transfer learning, review

Abstract

Fault diagnosis of mechanical equipment is essential for ensuring safe and reliable operation and reducing losses caused by unplanned downtime. With the large-scale deployment of sensors and the Industrial Internet of Things, condition-monitoring data have grown rapidly in both volume and dimensionality. Conventional diagnostic approaches that rely on human expertise and signal processing are increasingly inadequate, while machine learning, especially deep learning, has become the dominant research paradigm because of its automatic feature extraction and powerful nonlinear modeling capabilities. Following a data-feature-model-application framework, this paper systematically reviews advances in machine-learning applications for mechanical equipment fault diagnosis. It first outlines the basic diagnostic workflow, commonly used monitoring signals, and representative public datasets. It then reviews diagnostic methods based on conventional machine learning, including feature engineering, support vector machines, and ensemble learning, as well as deep-learning methods based on convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, autoencoders, attention mechanisms, and Transformers, comparing their principles, applicable conditions, strengths, and limitations. For real industrial environments, the paper focuses on emerging directions such as few-shot learning, transfer learning, multisensor fusion and graph neural networks, federated learning, and generative-adversarial-network-based data augmentation, and summarizes their applications to representative systems including rotating machinery, motors, computer numerical control machine tools, and pumps. Finally, current challenges are analyzed from the perspectives of data quality, model generalization, interpretability, and real-time edge deployment, and future trends involving physics-data integration, foundation models, and intelligent operation and maintenance are discussed. The analysis shows that the field is evolving from discriminative diagnosis dependent on large amounts of labeled data toward few-shot, cross-condition, interpretable, and deployable solutions. Data governance and engineering implementation will therefore become the principal bottlenecks constraining practical adoption.

Abstract 93 | PDF Downloads 35

References

  • [1] ZHAO Z B, WU J Y, LI T F, et al. Challenges and opportunities of AI-enabled monitoring, diagnosis & prognosis: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 34: 66. DOI: 10.1186/s10033-021-00570-7.
  • [2] JARDINE A K S, LIN D, BANJEVIC D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(7): 1483-1510. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012.
  • [3] CHEN X F, WANG S B, QIAO B J, et al. Basic research on machinery fault diagnostics: past, present, and future trends[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(2): 264-291. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-018-0472-3.
  • [4] SHEN B M, CHEN B J, ZHAO C H, et al. A review of deep learning in fault prognostics and health management of mechanical equipment[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2021, 49(19): 162-171. (in Chinese)
  • [5] ZHAO R, YAN R, CHEN Z, et al. Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 115: 213-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050.
  • [6] KHAN S, YAIRI T. A review on the application of deep learning in system health management[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 107: 241-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024.
  • [7] LEI Y, YANG B, JIANG X, et al. Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 138: 106587. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587.
  • [8] ZHANG S, ZHANG S B, WANG B N, et al. Deep learning algorithms for bearing fault diagnostics—A comprehensive review[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 29857-29881. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2972859.
  • [9] HOANG D T, KANG H J. A survey on deep learning based bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Neurocomputing, 2019, 335: 327-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.078.
  • [10] BENBOUZID M E H. A review of induction motors signature analysis as a medium for faults detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2000, 47(5): 984-993. DOI: 10.1109/41.873206.
  • [11] LESSMEIER C, KIMOTHO J K, ZIMMER D, et al. Condition monitoring of bearing damage in electromechanical drive systems by using motor current signals of electric motors: a benchmark data set for data-driven classification[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference of the PHM Society. Bilbao, Spain: PHM Society, 2016: 1-10.
  • [12] SMITH W A, RANDALL R B. Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2015, 64-65: 100-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.021.
  • [13] LEI Y G, HAN T Y, WANG B, et al. XJTU-SY rolling element bearing accelerated life test datasets: a tutorial[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(16): 1-9. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2019.16.001.
  • [14] WU Z, HUANG N E. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method[J]. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2009, 1(1): 1-41. DOI: 10.1142/S1793536909000047.
  • [15] YANG Y, YU D, CHENG J. A fault diagnosis approach for roller bearing based on IMF envelope spectrum and SVM[J]. Measurement, 2007, 40(9-10): 943-950. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2006.10.010.
  • [16] SAMANTA B, AL-BALUSHI K R. Artificial neural network based fault diagnostics of rolling element bearings using time-domain features[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2003, 17(2): 317-328. DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2001.1462.
  • [17] SAIDI L, BEN ALI J, FNAIECH F. Application of higher order spectral features and support vector machines for bearing faults classification[J]. ISA Transactions, 2015, 54: 193-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.08.007.
  • [18] GUO W C, ZHAO H S, LI C, et al. Enhanced diagnosis of bearing fault features based on wavelet-packet energy spectrum and principal component analysis[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(11): 2370-2377. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.11.022. (in Chinese)
  • [19] WANG S X, HUANG Q, WANG X S, et al. Diagnosis of rolling-bearing fault severity based on WPT, PCA, and SVM[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2022(4): 5-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3997.2022.04.002. (in Chinese)
  • [20] WIDODO A, YANG B S. Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2007, 21(6): 2560-2574. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.007.
  • [21] XU G, LIU M, JIANG Z, et al. Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Random Forest Ensemble Learning[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(5): 1088. DOI: 10.3390/s19051088.
  • [22] ZHANG R T, CHEN Z G, LI B B, et al. Gearbox fault diagnosis based on a deep convolutional neural network model and XGBoost[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2020, 42(5): 1059-1066. DOI: 10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2020.05.007. (in Chinese)
  • [23] WANG D. K-nearest neighbors based methods for identification of different gear crack levels under different motor speeds and loads: Revisited[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 70-71: 201-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.10.007.
  • [24] LIU R, YANG B, ZIO E, et al. Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 108: 33-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.016.
  • [25] ZHANG W, PENG G, LI C, et al. A new deep learning model for fault diagnosis with good anti-noise and domain adaptation ability on raw vibration signals[J]. Sensors, 2017, 17(2): 425. DOI: 10.3390/s17020425.
  • [26] ZHANG W, LI C, PENG G, et al. A deep convolutional neural network with new training methods for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy environment and different working load[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 100: 439-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.022.
  • [27] JIAO J, ZHAO M, LIN J, et al. A comprehensive review on convolutional neural network in machine fault diagnosis[J]. Neurocomputing, 2020, 417: 36-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.088.
  • [28] ZHANG K, TANG B, DENG L, et al. A hybrid attention improved ResNet based fault diagnosis method of wind turbines gearbox[J]. Measurement, 2021, 179: 109491. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109491.
  • [29] WANG Q, DENG L F, ZHAO R Z. Rolling-bearing fault identification based on an improved one-dimensional convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(3): 216-223. (in Chinese)
  • [30] LEI J, LIU C, JIANG D. Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on Long Short-term memory networks[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 133: 422-432. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.031.
  • [31] ZHANG B, ZHANG S, LI W. Bearing performance degradation assessment using long short-term memory recurrent network[J]. Computers in Industry, 2019, 106: 14-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.016.
  • [32] JIA F, LEI Y, LIN J, et al. Deep neural networks: A promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 72-73: 303-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.10.025.
  • [33] CHEN K, MAO Z W, ZHANG J J, et al. Diesel-engine fault diagnosis using a stacked autoencoder optimized by harmony search[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(11): 132-140. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2020.11.132. (in Chinese)
  • [34] GOODFELLOW I J, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al. Generative adversarial nets[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). Montreal: Curran Associates, 2014: 2672-2680.
  • [35] WANG J, LI S, HAN B, et al. Generalization of deep neural networks for imbalanced fault classification of machinery using generative adversarial networks[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 111168-111180. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924003.
  • [36] JI M, ZHAO G. DEViT: Deformable convolution-based vision transformer for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024, 73: 1-13. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2024.3440383.
  • [37] DENG F Y, ZHENG S X, HAO R J. Axle-box bearing fault diagnosis using a lightweight scale-aware modulated Swin Transformer[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2024, 58(9): 83-93. (in Chinese)
  • [38] WU K, WU J, SHU Q M, et al. Review of few-shot fault-diagnosis methods for rotating machinery based on deep learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(2): 3-19. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04175. (in Chinese)
  • [39] FINN C, ABBEEL P, LEVINE S. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). Sydney: PMLR, 2017: 1126-1135.
  • [40] SNELL J, SWERSKY K, ZEMEL R. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). Long Beach: Curran Associates, 2017: 4077-4087.
  • [41] JIANG C, CHEN H, XU Q, et al. Few-shot fault diagnosis of rotating machinery with two-branch prototypical networks[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2023, 34(4): 1667-1681. DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01904-x.
  • [42] YAN R, SHEN F, SUN C, et al. Knowledge transfer for rotary machine fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 20(15): 8374-8393. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2949057.
  • [43] GANIN Y, USTINOVA E, AJAKAN H, et al. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2016, 17(59): 1-35.
  • [44] WEN L, GAO L, LI X. A new deep transfer learning based on sparse auto-encoder for fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2019, 49(1): 136-144. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2754287.
  • [45] LIU C, GRYLLIAS K. Simulation-driven domain adaptation for rolling element bearing fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(9): 5760-5770. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3103412.
  • [46] LI C, KWOH C K, LI X, et al. Rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion using graph attention network[C]//2022 17th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV). Singapore: IEEE, 2022: 678-683. DOI: 10.1109/ICARCV57592.2022.10004378.
  • [47] SUN K, YIN A. Multi-sensor temporal-spatial graph network fusion empirical mode decomposition convolution for machine fault diagnosis[J]. Information Fusion, 2025, 114: 102708. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102708.
  • [48] CHEN J, LI J, HUANG R, et al. Federated transfer learning for bearing fault diagnosis with discrepancy-based weighted federated averaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2022, 71: 3518211. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2022.3180417.
  • [49] XIAO Y, SHAO H, LIN J, et al. BCE-FL: A secure and privacy-preserving federated learning system for device fault diagnosis under Non-IID condition in IIoT[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(8): 14241-14252. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3340745.
  • [50] KANG S Q, XIAO Y, WANG Y J, et al. Fault diagnosis of rolling bearings of different specifications based on federated model transfer[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(22): 184-192. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2023.22.021. (in Chinese)
  • [51] SHEN T, LI S M, XIN Y. Review of deep-learning-based fault diagnosis for rotating machinery[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2020, 28(9): 1-8. (in Chinese)
  • [52] NIU G, DONG X, CHEN Y. Motor fault diagnostics based on current signatures: a review[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 3506419. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3285999.
  • [53] KUMAR R R, ANDRIOLLO M, CIRRINCIONE G, et al. A comprehensive review of conventional and intelligence-based approaches for the fault diagnosis and condition monitoring of induction motors[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(23): 8938. DOI: 10.3390/en15238938.
  • [54] WANG W P, WANG Q, YU Y. Fault identification of machine-tool spindle systems based on attention mechanisms and deep-learning algorithms[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(4): 861-875. (in Chinese)
  • [55] LONG J, MOU J, ZHANG L, et al. Attitude data-based deep hybrid learning architecture for intelligent fault diagnosis of multi-joint industrial robots[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 61: 736-745. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.010.
  • [56] WEI X L, CHAO Q, TAO J F, et al. Fault diagnosis of high-speed plunger pumps based on LSTM and CNN[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(3): 429-439. (in Chinese)
  • [57] CHENG W, WANG S, LIU Y, et al. A novel planetary gearbox fault diagnosis method for nuclear circulating water pump with class imbalance and data distribution shift[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 1-13. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3238752.
  • [58] JIA F, LEI Y, LU N, et al. Deep normalized convolutional neural network for imbalanced fault classification of machinery and its understanding via visualization[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 110: 349-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.03.025.
  • [59] LIU H, LIU Z, JIA W, et al. A novel imbalanced data classification method based on weakly supervised learning for fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(3): 1583-1593. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3084132.
  • [60] BRUSA E, CIBRARIO L, DELPRETE C, et al. Explainable AI for machine fault diagnosis: understanding features’ contribution in machine learning models for industrial condition monitoring[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(4): 2038. DOI: 10.3390/app13042038.
  • [61] AN K, LU J, ZHU Q, et al. Edge solution for real-time motor fault diagnosis based on efficient convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 3508912(1-12). DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3276513.
  • [62] FU L, YAN K, ZHANG Y, et al. EdgeCog: a real-time bearing fault diagnosis system based on lightweight edge computing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 3515011(1-11). DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3298403.
  • [63] DENG W, NGUYEN K T P, MEDJAHER K, et al. Physics-informed machine learning in prognostics and health management: state of the art and challenges[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2023, 124: 325-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2023.07.011.
  • [64] VAN DINTER R, TEKINERDOGAN B, CATAL C. Predictive maintenance using digital twins: a systematic literature review[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2022, 151: 107008. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107008.
  • [65] WANG J, LI T, YANG Y, et al. DiagLLM: multimodal reasoning with large language model for explainable bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2025, 68(6): 161103. DOI: 10.1007/s11432-024-4333-7.