Big Data-Based Analysis of Urban Traffic Congestion: A Case Study of Beijing

Main Article Content

Zihan Zhou

Keywords

urban traffic congestion, big data analysis, deep learning, LSTM

Abstract

As urbanization continues to reshape large cities, traffic congestion remains a persistent challenge for urban transportation systems. Using Beijing as a case study, this paper examines the spatiotemporal evolution of urban traffic congestion from a deep learning perspective based on multi-source data. The results suggest that traffic congestion in Beijing displays a pronounced “dual-peak” pattern associated with daily commuting activities. Compared with the pre-pandemic period, weekday travel demand has generally recovered and in some cases exceeded previous levels, whereas holiday travel remains relatively subdued, accompanied by increasingly concentrated travel behavior. Among the models considered, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) performs particularly well in capturing nonlinear variations and temporal dependencies in traffic flow, leading to improved prediction accuracy. Between 2020 and 2025, the congestion index experienced a trajectory of decline, recovery, and subsequent stabilization, a pattern that appears to be associated with the gradual implementation of intelligent traffic management measures. These findings contribute to a better understanding of recent changes in urban traffic dynamics and may offer useful insights for future traffic planning and governance.

Abstract 23 | PDF Downloads 11

References

  • [1] Cui, Z., Ke, R., Pu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020). Stacked bidirectional and unidirectional LSTM recurrent neural network for forecasting network-wide traffic state with missing values. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 118, 102674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102674.
  • [2] Zhang, H., Dong, H., & Yang, Z. (2025). TSGDiff: Traffic state generative diffusion model using multi-source information fusion. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 174, 105081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2025.105081.
  • [3] Wang, L. K., & Chen, C. (2024). Exploration of big data analysis and prediction models in transportation planning. Theoretical Research on Urban Construction (Electronic Edition), (14), 151-153. https://doi.org/10.19569/j.cnki.cn119313/tu.202414051.
  • [4] Wang, B. L., Han, B. R., Dong, R., & Sun, Z. Y. (2024). Analysis of road congestion based on traffic status data. Logistics Technology, 47(15), 80-84. https://doi.org/10.13714/j.cnki.1002-3100.2024.15.020.
  • [5] Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau Traffic Management Bureau. (2026, March). Business data release and government affairs disclosure (January 2026). https://jtgl.beijing.gov.cn/jgj/jgxx/ywsj/index.html.
  • [6] Amap. (2025). Amap traffic reports for Q1, Q2, and Q3 of 2025 (May, November, December 2025). Traffic Diagnosis Platform. https://report.amap.com/diagnosis/index.do.
  • [7] Beijing Transport Institute. (2026, April). Annual report on Beijing transport development (Over the years). Beijing Municipal Commission of Transport. https://jtw.beijing.gov.cn/xxgk/.
  • [8] Jiang, Y. S., Zhang, J., & Hu, L. (2022). Simulation study on interactive effects between ride-hailing and urban traffic congestion in large-scale scenarios. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 42(11), 3079-3089.