The Impact of Executives’ Overseas Background on Corporate ESG: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Companies

Main Article Content

Yufei Liu

Keywords

executives’ overseas background, ESG performance, upper echelons theory, corporate governance level

Abstract

Within the dual background of the “dual carbon” strategy and the standardized development of ESG in capital markets, exploring the driving mechanisms of corporate ESG performance is crucial, for promoting the sustainable operation of listed companies. This research takes Chinese A-share listed companies, from 2009 to 2023, as the research sample and, empirically analyzes the impact of executives’ overseas background on corporate ESG performance, based on upper echelons theory. The findings are concluded as follows: executives’ overseas background can boost a company’s overall ESG score, and remains valid after a series of robustness tests; mechanism tests indicate that executives’ overseas background can enhance corporate governance, thus improving corporate ESG performance; heterogeneity analysis indicates that this effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, mature enterprises, and enterprises with lower levels of green innovation. This research provides empirical evidence for enterprises to optimize management configuration and improve ESG governance.

Abstract 20 | PDF Downloads 11

References

  • [1]Hongjun Xiao. (2025). Twenty years of ESG development: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 45 (1), 1–12.
  • [2]Rongxin Zhang & Hongjiang Dong. (2026). Research on the impact of ESG performance on the value of new energy vehicle enterprises: A case study of Company A. China Collective Economy, (22), 101–104.
  • [3]Whelan, T., Atz, U., Van Holt, T., & Clark, C. (2025). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) research: A systematic review of recent trends (2020–2024). Sustainable Development, 33 (6), 3245–3262.
  • [4]Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 193–206.
  • [5]Wen Wen & Jianbo Song. (2017). Executives’ overseas background and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Science, 30 (2), 119–131.
  • [6]Tiyi Feng, Xinni Shen, et al. (2026). Executives’ overseas experience and corporate risk-taking level. Financial Economy, (2), 57–68.
  • [7]Linlin Wang, Yonghui, Lian, Y., & Dong, J. (2022). Research on the influence mechanism of ESG performance on corporate value. Securities Market Herald, (5), 23–34.
  • [8]Haijian Li, & Yuexin Tian. (2021). A review of enterprise strategy research based on upper echelons theory. Economic Management Journal, 43 (4), 191–208.
  • [9]Zhen Yang & Hongcheng Lin. (2024). Will returnee executives improve corporate ESG performance? Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, 31 (2), 88–110.
  • [10]Zhang, K., Bai, G., Meng, D., & Wang, Y. (2022). The influence mechanism and contingency thinking of subsidiaries’ green governance within the framework of group-based on disclosure of environmental and sustainable development information. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31 (2), 1935–1950.
  • [11]Bo Liu, Jiarui Lu & Tao Ju. (2023). Formalism or substantivism: Research on green innovation under soft regulation of ESG ratings. Nankai Business Review, 26 (5), 16–28.
  • [12]Yaoming Jiang & Yan Lai. (2019). Executives’ overseas background, information disclosure quality, and corporate social responsibility. Contemporary Finance & Economics, (7), 118–128.
  • [13]Weian Li, Yaowei Zhang, Minna Zheng, et al. (2019). Green governance and evaluation of Chinese listed companies. Management World, 35 (5), 126–133, 160.
  • [14]Giannetti, M., Liao, G., & Yu, X. (2015). The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from China. Journal of Finance, 70 (4), 1629–1663.
  • [15]Pengtao Zhuang, Qing He, Wangjing Ju, & Qin Xia. (2026). ESG news reports and stock price synchronicity of listed companies. Securities Market Herald, (5), 25–34.