Analysis of the Impact of Financial Technology on the Liquidity Risk of Commercial Banks

Main Article Content

Mingrui Su

Keywords

fintech, commercial banks, liquidity risk

Abstract

With the rapid development of financial technology, the liquidity of commercial banks has undergone tremendous changes. Based on this, this paper comprehensively combs through a number of relevant core literature at home and abroad, discusses the impact of financial technology on the liquidity risk of commercial banks, the mechanism of financial technology on the liquidity of commercial banks, summarizes relevant research conclusions and puts forward corresponding suggestions. The results show that most scholars believe that fintech can increase the liquidity of commercial banks, improve the level of liquidity creation and reduce risks. The mechanism includes the effect of debt structure optimization and the effect of asset allocation efficiency improvement. These mechanisms reshape the liquidity and risk flow of commercial banks. A few scholars believe that the development of financial technology will bring liquidity challenges to commercial banks. The research conclusion provides a decision-making reference for the management of liquidity risk of commercial banks and the regulatory authorities to improve the supervision of financial technology.

Abstract 10 | PDF Downloads 4

References

  • [1] Morelli, G., Pugliese, V., & Santucci de Magistris, P. (2025). Liquidity coverage at risk. Quantitative Finance, 25(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2025.2457366
  • [2] Cheng, L. (2026). The impact of financial technology on the liquidity risk of commercial banks. Business Observation, 12(12), 69–72.
  • [3] Yin, F., Jiao, X., Zhou, J., Yin, X., Ibeke, E., Iwendi, M. G., & Biamba, C. (2022). Fintech application on banking stability using big data of an emerging economy. Journal of Cloud Computing, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S13677-022-00320-7
  • [4] Li, J., Wang, L., & Peng, Y. (2023). Bank fintech and liquidity creation. Nankai Economic Studies, (5), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.14116/j.nkes.2023.05.001
  • [5] Berger, A. N., & Sedunov, J. (2017). Bank liquidity creation and real economic output. Journal of Banking & Finance, 81, 1–19.
  • [6] Zhao, X., Li, S., Lu, K., & Zhong, Y. (2024). Intelligent transformation, fintech, and green growth: A general equilibrium analysis based on credit allocation perspective. Journal of Environmental.
  • [7] Guo, P., & Zhang, C. (2023). The impact of bank fintech on liquidity creation: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2022.101858
  • [8] Yu, W., & Zheng, J. (2021). Internet finance, deposit competition, and bank liquidity creation. West Forum, 31(2), 106–124.
  • [9] Julapa, J., Lauren, L., & Timothy, L. (2021). Fintech lending and mortgage credit access. The Journal of FinTech.
  • [10] Lee, E., & Alam, M. Z. (2026). Impact of monetary policy on bank liquidity creation: Economic policy uncertainty channel. Journal of Banking Regulation, 27(3), 39–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41261-026-00340-2
  • [11] Li, M., Zhang, H., & Ruan, P. (2026). Strong financial supervision and divergence in bank liquidity creation: Empirical evidence from new asset management regulations. Finance Research Letters, 107, 109888.
  • [12] Wu, X. (2022). Financial technology under the background of China Merchants Bank retail business transformation analysis. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.23977/IEIM.2022.051204
  • [13] Song, K., Li, Z., & Yang, J. (2023). Fintech and bank behavior: From the perspective of liquidity creation. Journal of Financial Research, (2), 60–77.
  • [14] Liu, Y. (2026). Research on the liquidity of smart deposits through financial technology innovation under the framework of asset liability management. Procedia Computer Science, 282, 2023–2031. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2026.05.245
  • [15] Tang, Q., Xu, K., Zou, M., & Huo, L. (2026). Can FinTech empower companies to develop corporate new quality productive forces? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 108, 105298. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2026.105298
  • [16] Li, G., Huang, Y., & Wang, Q. (n.d.). Four-party evolutionary game analysis of collaborative governance of digital supply chain financial risks embedded with fintech. Systems Engineering, 1–13.
  • [17] Liu, Y., Tong, A., & Nourani, P. (2026). FinTech adoption and credit risk dynamics: Evidence from China’s A-share banking sector. Journal of Banking Regulation, 27(2), 25–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41261-026-00327-Z
  • [18] Ren, M., Zhao, J., Ke, K., & Li, Y. (2023). Bank homogeneity and risk-taking: Evidence from China. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 92, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.QREF.2023.09.002
  • [19] Nofsinger, J. R. (2026). FinTech as behavioral infrastructure: Digital platforms and the amplification of risk. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 51, 101216. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBEF.2026.101216
  • [20] Wang, R., & Cui, W. (2024). Research on digital finance, financial regulation and commercial bank risk-taking. Economics & Management Review, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.37420/J.EMR.2024.046