The Economic Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Research from the Perspective of Task Content

Main Article Content

Jingyi Shi

Keywords

generative artificial intelligence, task-content analysis method, substitution effect, labor market, cross-country heterogeneity

Abstract

The rapid iterative development of generative artificial intelligence technology is fundamentally reshaping production methods and labor forms. Its ability to penetrate non-routine cognitive tasks breaks the impact boundary of traditional automation technologies, and also promotes task content analysis method to become the mainstream research paradigm in this field. This paper systematically sorts out the theoretical evolution and research progress of the economic impact of generative AI from the perspective of task content. From the two dimensions of industrial development and labor market, it integrates the research results of core topics such as enterprise adoption, productivity effect, market structure, labor complementarity and substitution, and changes in employment structure. It focuses on clarifying the sources of divergence and applicable boundaries of different research conclusions. Studies show that existing literature has formed a basic consensus that generative AI exerts impact mainly through the reconstruction of intra-occupational tasks. However, there are still significant divergences in the total employment effect, the implementation degree of productivity gains, and the mechanism of cross-country heterogeneity. The main limitations of current research in this field include the short research time span, lack of evidence from developing economies, and insufficient research on long-term dynamic mechanisms. The contribution of this paper is to restore the seemingly divergent literature conclusions to differences in methodological premises with a unified three-effect coordinate, and put forward corresponding testable designs for each type of research gap. Future research needs to be further deepened around the two core dimensions of industry and labor market, improve localized measurement systems, and expand long-term dynamic analysis.

Abstract 7 | PDF Downloads 2

References

  • [1]del Rio-Chanona, R. M., Ernst, E., & Merola, R. (2025). AI and jobs: A review of theory, estimates, and evidence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15265. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15265
  • [2]Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10130. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130
  • [3]Yu, Y., Fleming, M., & Hampton, L. (2026). AI adoption in S&P 500 firms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.08920. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08920
  • [4]Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., & Bescond, D. (2023). Generative AI and jobs: A global analysis of potential effects on job quantity and quality (ILO Working Paper No. 96). International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/publications/generative-ai-and-jobs-global-analysis-potential-effects-job-quantity-and
  • [5]Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.
  • [6]Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.
  • [7]Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542.
  • [8]Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30.
  • [9]Felten, E. W., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2023). The occupational exposure to generative AI. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4414065
  • [10]Genz, S., Gregory, T., & Lehmer, F. (2026). AI-powered skill classification: Mapping technology intensity in the German labor market (IZA Discussion Paper No. 18415). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/18415
  • [11]World Bank. (2026). World development report 2026: Artificial intelligence for development. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2026
  • [12]World Bank, & International Labour Organization. (2026). Disruption without dividend? How the digital divide and task differences split GenAI’s global impact. World Bank Group. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/cc8107dc9345083becb4cbc57917e1ae-0370012026/original/4-Disruption-without-Dividend.pdf
  • [13]Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192.
  • [14]Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942.
  • [15]Kauhanen, A., & Rouvinen, P. (2025). Assessing early labour market effects of generative AI: Evidence from population data. Applied Economics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2025.2513973
  • [16]Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Tasks, automation, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5), 1973–2016.
  • [17]Cazzaniga, M., Jaumotte, F., & Li, L. (2024). Gen-AI: Artificial intelligence and the future of work (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. SDN/2024/001). International Monetary Fund. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/006/2024/001/article-A001-en.xml