A Study Based on the Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Corporate Performance

Main Article Content

Boyuan Deng

Keywords

ESG rating divergence, financial performance, market performance, financing constraint theory, signaling theory

Abstract

As a core professional indicator that defines the sustainable development potential and long-term value of an enterprise, the ESG rating plays an important role in current investment decision-making and enterprise development assessment. However, the ESG rating results of the same company by different rating agencies often differ significantly. In this study, A-share listed companies in China from 2015–2023 are used as the sample to systematically investigate the impact of the divergence of ESG ratings on the financial performance and market performance of firms, and the action mechanism is analyzed on the basis of financing constraint theory, institutional theory and signaling theory. The study reveals that the divergence of ESG ratings significantly inhibits companies’ financial performance and market performance, and this conclusion still holds after a series of stability tests. Mechanistic tests reveal that ESG rating divergence inhibits corporate financial performance and market performance through the triple path of strengthening financing constraints, weakening corporate green technology innovation capability and reducing the quality of information disclosure. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that this negative effect is more prominent among companies in the eastern region, companies in heavily polluting industries, and companies with greater attention from analysts. This study provides not only management inspiration for enterprises to optimize their ESG management system but also a theoretical basis and policy reference for enhancing the sustainable development effectiveness of listed companies and improving ESG ecological governance.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

  • Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFINECO.2021.09.009
  • Bai, F., Liu, D., & Dong, K. (2022). How does digital transformation affect corporate financial performance: A multiple mediation analysis based on structural equation modeling. East China Economic Management, 36(9), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.220224020
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ROF/RFAC033
  • Brandona, R. G., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1963186
  • Chen, H., Yin, H., Zhang, T., & Huang, J. (2025). Does ESG rating divergence affect pricing efficiency in the capital market? Evidence from stock price synchronicity of listed companies. Journal of Financial Research, 51(5), 65-80.
  • Chen, J., & Wei, X. (2025). Does ESG rating divergence affect corporate performance? Reform, (6), 148-163.
  • Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. Accounting Review, 97(1), 147-175. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
  • Deng, X., Kang, J. k., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFINECO.2013.04.014
  • Deng, X., Luo, H., Long, X., & et al. (2021). Top management team heterogeneity, competitive strategy mix, and market performance: Evidence from China’s home appliance industry. Nankai Business Review, 24(4), 103-117.
  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (2010). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (translated by G. Yudin). Journal of Economic Sociology, 11(1), 34-56. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2010-1-34-56
  • Fan, Y., Cheng, K., Wang, H., & Zhang, Z. P. (2025). The impact of ESG rating divergence on corporate debt financing costs. Friends of Accounting, (14), 80-87.
  • Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.2014.2038
  • Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  • Gu, L., Guo, J., & Wang, H. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, financing constraints and corporate financialization. Financial Research, (2), 109-127.
  • He, T., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Tan, Z. D. (2023). Does ESG rating divergence increase voluntary information disclosure of listed companies? Accounting and Economic Research, 37(3), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.16314/j.cnki.31-2074/f.2023.03.006
  • Hong, M. (2025). Performance evaluation of logistics enterprises from the perspective of ESG [Unpublished master's thesis, Hangzhou Dianzi University]. Hangzhou.
  • Hu, L., Chen, Z., & Liu, Z. (2025). Virtue leads to long-term stability: ESG performance and corporate resilience. Southwest Finance, (5), 71-86.
  • Huang, R., Xie, X., & Zhou, H. (2020). The “isomorphic” behavior of corporate greenwashing. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30(11), 139-150.
  • Kimbrough, M. D., Wang, X., Wei, S., & Zhang, J. (2024). Does voluntary ESG reporting resolve disagreement among ESG rating agencies? European Accounting Review, 33(1), 15-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2088588
  • Lee, M. T., & Suh, I. (2022). Understanding the effects of environment, social, and governance conduct on financial performance: Arguments for a process and integrated modelling approach. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), Article 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STAE.2022.100004
  • Li, J., Yang, Z., Chen, J., & Cui, W. (2021). The mechanism of ESG promoting corporate performance: From the perspective of corporate innovation. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 42(9), 71-89.
  • Li, W., & Zheng, M. (2016). Substantive innovation or strategic innovation? The impact of macro industrial policy on micro enterprise innovation. Economic Research Journal, 51(4), 60-73.
  • Liu, X., & Shao, R. (2021). Environmental protection tax, technological innovation, and corporate financial performance: A study based on DID method. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 40(9), 24-30.
  • Liu, X., Yang, Q., & Hu, J. (2023). ESG rating divergence and stock price synchronicity. China Soft Science, (8), 108-120.
  • Mao, Z., Wang, S., & Lin, Y. E. (2024). ESG, ESG rating divergence and earnings management: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3328-3347. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2748
  • Nie, M., & Zhang, X. (2025). The impact of green technological innovation on corporate financial performance under the “dual carbon” goal: Empirical evidence from heavily polluting manufacturing industries. Finance and Accounting Theory and Practice, 46(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbcjb.2025.02.011
  • Ruan, L., & Yang, L. (2025). The impact of ESG rating divergence on supply chain resilience. Journal of Financial Research, 51(4), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20250122.301
  • Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2023). Stock price reactions to ESG News: The Role of ESG Ratings and Disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies,, 28(3), 1500-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3
  • Shan, X. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on corporate sustainable development: Mediating effect of green technological and management innovation. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, (3), 1-10.
  • Su, Y., Pan, L., Li, J., & et al. (2025). Financialization, financing constraints, and financial performance of manufacturing enterprises. Friends of Accounting, (9), 123-130.
  • Sun, H., & Zhu, S. (2023). The bilateral effect of corporate ESG performance on financial performance. Friends of Accounting, (20), 52-60.
  • Sun, J., Tan, W., & Guo, F. (2024). Re-evaluation of mainstream ESG ratings in China. Journal of Financial Research, 50(5), 4-18, 78. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20240413.102
  • Sun, L. (2024). The impact of ESG rating divergence on corporate value [Master's thesis, Shandong University of Finance and Economics]. CNKI.
  • Wan, G., Pu, F., Li, Z., & Cao, Y. (2024). The interaction between enterprise marketing capability and production operation capability and its impact on performance. China Management Science, 32(5), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0478
  • Wang, L., Liu, Q., & Li, K. (2024). ESG rating divergence and corporate bond pricing: Information mining or information deterioration. International Financial Research, (3), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.16475/j.cnki.1006-1029.2024.03.008
  • Xu, J., Wu, Y., Liang, P., & Hou, D. S. (2025). Digital procurement, supplier cooperation and corporate market performance. Journal of Financial Research, 51(1), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20241014.101
  • Zhang, H., & Luo, L. (2021). The synergistic effect of competitive strategy and social responsibility on corporate market performance. Journal of Management, 18(8), 1204-1219.
  • Zhao, Y., Sun, Y., Feng, T., & Liu, Y. (2024). How supplier ESG rating divergence affects enterprise operational resilience. China Industrial Economics, (11), 174-192. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2024.11.010
  • Zhou, Z., Gu, W., & San, Z. (2023). ESG rating divergence and analysts’ earnings forecast accuracy. China Soft Science, (10), 164-176.
  • Zou, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2024). The impact of ESG “greenwashing” on corporate performance. Contemporary Finance & Economics, (11), 152-164. https://doi.org/10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.20240806.004