The Impact of ESG Ratings on Enterprises' Green Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study Based on Staggered Difference-in-Differences(Staggered DID)

Main Article Content

Jiayi Xu

Keywords

ESG rating, green innovation, Staggered DID, financing constraints, supply chain discourse

Abstract

Based on a Staggered Difference-in-Differences(Staggered DID) model, this paper empirically examines the impact of ESG ratings on corporate green innovation capability and its mechanism. The study takes Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2023 as a sample, and uses the first announcement of ESG ratings by SynTao Green Finance as an exogenous shock. The study finds that ESG ratings significantly enhance the green innovation capacity of enterprises, increasing the total green innovation by 12.19% on average, and the promotion effect on green invention patents is larger than that on green utility model patents. Moreover, the robustness of the results was verified by parallel trend test, placebo test, and changing the sample interval. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect is more significant in larger firms. Further mechanism tests reveal that financing constraints and supply chain discourse are key moderating variables: financing constraints weaken the positive effect of ESG on green innovation, and supply chain discourse strengthens the positive effect of ESG on green innovation. This study provides empirical evidence to understand how ESG ratings drive corporate green innovation by alleviating information asymmetry, strengthening reputational monitoring and optimising resource allocation, and provides insights for companies to optimise ESG strategies, governments to improve green financial policies and promote industry chain synergies.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

  • Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). A heterogeneity-robust estimator for multi-period difference-in-differences. Journal of Econometrics, 235(1), 2218-2244.
  • Chen, X., Li, H., & Chen, S. (2024). ESG performance of listed companies: Literature review and future prospects. Finance and Accounting Monthly, (23), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2024.23.006
  • Hu, J., Yu, X., & Han, Y. (2023). Can ESG ratings promote corporate green transformation: Evidence based on Staggered DID analysis. Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics, 40(7), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20230517.002
  • Huang, W., & Chen, X. (2024). The impact of executives' technological imprints on green innovation capability of high-tech enterprises: Based on the perspective of digital empowerment. Soft Science, 38(5), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2024.05.02
  • Li, Q., & Chen, L. (2024). The impact of ESG rating uncertainty on corporate green innovation. Chinese Journal of Management, 21(12), 1820-1829.
  • Li, T., & Li, J. (2023). How does green governance empower high-quality development: An explanation based on ESG responsibility and total factor productivity. Accounting Research, (6), 78-98.
  • Li, W., & Zheng, M. (2016). Substantive innovation or strategic innovation: The impact of macro industrial policy on micro enterprise innovation. Economic Research Journal, 51(4), 60-73.
  • Li, Y., Yin, J., Qian, J., & Jiang, Q. (2023). ESG performance and green innovation. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, (2), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.20211/j.cnki.jnufe.2023.02.004
  • Liu, B., Lu, J., & Ju, T. (2023). Formalism or substantialism: Research on green innovation under ESG rating soft regulation. Nankai Business Review, 26(5), 16-28.
  • Lu, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, L., & Shi, G. (2024). ESG ratings and green innovation. Sustainability, 16, 10869.
  • Mao, Z., & Wei, Y. (2023). The impact of state-owned capital participation on green innovation capacity of private enterprises. Soft Science, 37(2), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2023.02.06
  • Meng, M., Tan, X., Liu, S., & Lei, J. (2023). The impact of corporate ESG performance on green innovation. Technology Economics, 42(7), 13-24.
  • Shi, M., & Yan, J. (2024). Corporate ESG performance and suppliers’ green innovation: Evidence from supply chain perspective. Audit and Economic Research, 39(3), 97-106.
  • Song, X., Pan, J., & Li, X. (2025). Twenty years of ESG: Review and reflection. Contemporary Accounting Review, 2(1), 1-42.
  • Su, L., Wang, Y., & Wang, R. (2024). The impact of ESG on corporate value: A literature review. Finance and Accounting Monthly, (24), 9-15+120. https://doi.org/10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2024.24.001
  • Sun, H., Zhang, J., & Meng, F. (2025). The impact of ESG ratings on corporate green innovation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 35(2), 113-126.
  • Tang, H., Fang, S., & Jiang, D. (2022). Market performance of digital transformation: Can digital M&A enhance market power of manufacturing enterprises? Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics, 39(12), 90-110.
  • Wan, X., & Yang, B. (2022). Corporate cross-border mergers and acquisitions and green innovation capacity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of International Trade, (9), 106-123. https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2022.09.006
  • Wang, X., Pang, M., Jin, J., Tao, X., & Dong, H. (2025). Research on influencing factors of green innovation performance of heavily polluting enterprises based on machine learning. Science Research Management, 46(8), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.08.017
  • Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Research on green credit policy promoting green innovation. Management World, 37(6), 173-188+111. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0085
  • Wu, Q., Hu, Y., & Li, M. (2024). The impact of digital capability on green innovation in manufacturing enterprises: A chain mediation effect of relationship strength and knowledge coupling. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 41(17), 87-96.
  • Xing, M., & Xu, L. (2024). Digital transformation, dynamic capability, and green innovation in manufacturing enterprises. Statistics and Decision, 40(3), 184-188. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2024.03.033
  • Xu, J., & Cui, J. (2020). Low-carbon cities and corporate green technological innovation. China Industrial Economics, (12), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2020.12.008
  • Yang, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Does green credit policy promote substantive green innovation in enterprises? Management Review, (7), 1-14.
  • Yao, S., & Jiang, Y. (2023). The road to sustainable development: ESG practice and corporate innovation. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (4), 99-111.
  • Yu, J., Zhao, H., & Zhu, C. (2023). Tax reduction incentives and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of VAT refund. Contemporary Finance & Economics, (10), 44-57.
  • Zeng, P., & Xiao, J. (2023). Can the Yangtze River Economic Belt development strategy enhance regional green innovation capacity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Statistical Research, 40(6), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2023.06.007
  • Zhang, X., Mu, G., Han, F., & Miao, L. (2024). The impact of ESG divergence on corporate green innovation: Based on perspectives of corporate governance and external financing. Scientific Management Research, 42(5), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/g3.2024.05.011
  • Zhao, L., & Zhang, L. (2020). The impact of media attention on corporate green technological innovation: The moderating role of marketization level. Management Review, 32(9), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2020.09.011
  • Zhao, Q., & Li, H. (2024). Do ESG ratings promote corporate green technological innovation: Micro evidence from Chinese listed companies. South China Journal of Economics, (2), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.19592/j.cnki.scje.410177
  • Zhao, X., Yang, M., & Cao, X. (2023). State-owned equity participation, absorptive capacity, and green technological innovation in private enterprises: A moderated mediation model. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 40(7), 23-33.
  • Zhen, Y., & Sun, W. (2025). ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 42(6), 57-67.