The Impact of New Quality Productive Forces on Firm Performance and Its Mechanisms

Main Article Content

Ruixuan Zhang
Sun Wah International Business School, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70267/fer.250302.6078

Keywords

new quality productive forces, firm performance, digital capability, R&D investment

Abstract

This study takes Chinese A-share listed firms in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2015 to 2024 as the research sample, constructs a panel data model, and empirically examines the impact of new quality productive forces on firms’ short-term operating performance and long-term value performance. It further analyzes the underlying mechanisms, robustness, and heterogeneity characteristics. The results show that, first, new quality productive forces have a significantly positive effect on firm performance, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests, including the use of instrumental variable approaches and alternative measurements of core variables. Second, mechanism analysis indicates that R&D investment and digital capability serve as important transmission channels through which new quality productive forces affect firm performance. Specifically, new quality productive forces improve firm performance by promoting increased R&D investment and enhancing digital technological innovation capability. Third, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the performance-enhancing effect of new quality productive forces is particularly pronounced in non-heavily polluting industries. At the regional level, a clear gradient pattern is observed: the promoting effect is stronger for firms located in regions with higher levels of economic development than those in less developed regions, and it is more significant for firms in the eastern region than in the central and western regions. This study extends the literature on the microeconomic consequences of new quality productive forces to a certain extent and provides new empirical evidence for understanding the mechanisms through which technological innovation and the optimized allocation of production factors contribute to firm value creation. Meanwhile, it offers practical implications for guiding firms to accurately seize development opportunities associated with new quality productive forces and for assisting governments in implementing differentiated policies.

Abstract 23 | PDF Downloads 7

References

  • [1] Xi, J. (2023). Xi Jinping emphasized during his inspection in Heilongjiang to firmly grasp the strategic positioning in national development and strive to create a new situation of high-quality development. People’s Daily, 1.
  • [2] Chen, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, D. (2024). The factor mechanism and practical path of new quality productive forces empowering comprehensive rural revitalization. Economic Review, (4), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.202404029
  • [3] State Council. (2024). Government work report: Delivered at the second session of the 14th National People’s Congress on March 5, 2024. People’s Daily, 1.
  • [4] Ha, J., Lin, L., Chen, X., & Fan, Y. (2025). Network embeddedness, new quality productive forces, and firm performance in innovative industrial clusters. Scientific Decision Making, (9), 1–21.
  • [5] Qi, Y., & Liu, J. (2025). New quality productive forces and firm value from a financial perspective: Threshold effects based on profitability levels. Communication of Finance and Accounting, (21), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.20250408.001
  • [6] Li, X., Tian, Z., & Chang, B. (2024). New quality productive forces, resource utilization, and organizational resilience. West Forum, 34(4), 35–49.
  • [7] Zhou, W., & Xu, L. (2023). On new quality productive forces: Connotations, characteristics, and key focal points. Reform, (10), 1–13.
  • [8] Zhang, L., & Pu, Q. (2023). Connotation, theoretical innovation, and value implications of new quality productive forces. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Sciences Edition), 29(6), 137–148.
  • [9] Xiao, Y., Zhang, X., & Liu, X. (2024). New quality productive forces and intra-firm pay gap: A perspective of shared development. Economic Review, (3), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.19361/j.er.2024.03.05
  • [10] Bhaskar, R., Chortane, S. G., Kumar, A., & Pandey, D. K. (2026). Mandatory sustainability reporting and firm performance: A quasi-natural experiment. Finance Research Letters, 94, 109678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2026.109678
  • [11] Liu, D., Wang, X., Wang, S., & Shi, Y. (2025). New quality productive forces empowering firm resilience: An analytical framework based on new production relations and factors. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, (1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.20241012.001
  • [12] Manikandan, K. S., & Balaji, V. V. (2026). Ownership form, strategy distinctiveness, and firm performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10490-026-10113-0
  • [13] Cao, Y. (2024). The impact of digital new quality productive forces on industrial chain resilience. Statistics & Decision, 40(10), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2024.10.004
  • [14] Sadeghi, A., Aliasghar, O., & Sadeghi, V. J. (2026). Alliances with frenemies: Capability-building mechanisms linking coopetition to firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 208, 116076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116076
  • [15] Hu, Q. (2020). Mechanisms and performance of enterprise digital transformation. Zhejiang Academic Journal, (2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.16235/j.cnki.33-1005/c.2020.02.017
  • [16] Liu, X., Yang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2022). The construction and evolution of enterprise digital capability: A multi-case exploratory study. Reform, (10), 45–64.
  • [17] Jiang, H., Wang, Z., Chen, C., & Gai, J. (2025). How managers’ digital literacy promotes ambidextrous innovation: The serial mediating role of knowledge re-orchestration and digital capabilities. Business Process Management Journal, 31(8), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2025-0672
  • [18] Sun, Z., & Lu, R. (2023). A review and prospect of enterprise digital transformation research. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business, 25(6), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.13504/j.cnki.issn1008-2700.2023.06.007
  • [19] Guan, Y., Tang, Z., Tian, M., & Du, H. (2022). The impact of digital capability on corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Technology Economics, 41(6), 95–106.
  • [20] Lv, F., Zhu, Y., Robert, K., & Zhou, J. (2022). Value chain paths of digital innovation in SMEs. Science and Technology Management Research, 42(8), 102–110.
  • [21] Hu, Y., & Sun, L. (2025). The influence of digital innovation on innovation performance in manufacturing: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 37(11), 1356–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2309296
  • [22] Chen, S., & Wang, D. (2023). Digital transformation and firm resilience: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, 36(4), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.2023.04.005
  • [23] Wang, X., Luan, X., & Zhang, S. (2023). R&D investment, ESG performance, and market value: The moderating role of digitalization. Studies in Science of Science, 41(5), 896–904. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220606.001
  • [24] Ba, S., Wu, L., & Xiong, P. (2022). Government subsidies, R&D investment, and innovation performance. Statistics & Decision, 38(5), 166–169. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.05.032
  • [25] Chen, H., Qian, L., Gu, H., et al. (2025). Patent quality, R&D investment, and the profitability of technology-based firms. Finance Research Letters, 76, 106923.
  • [26] Li, H., & Geng, X. (2021). R&D investment, executive incentives, and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Social Sciences Edition), (6), 36–48.
  • [27] Song, J., Zhang, J., & Pan, Y. (2024). ESG development and new quality productive forces: Evidence from Chinese A-share firms. Contemporary Economic Management, 46(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.13253/j.cnki.ddjjgl.2024.06.001
  • [28] Zhang, X., Wang, W., & Yu, Y. (2025). Digital-intelligent transformation and new quality productive forces. Studies in Science of Science, 43(5), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240518.003
  • [29] Shi, D., & Sun, G. (2024). Data elements and new quality productive forces: A firm-level TFP perspective. Economic Theory and Business Management, 44(4), 12–30.
  • [30] Huang, Q., & Sheng, F. (2024). The system of new quality productive forces: Factor characteristics, structural support, and functional orientation. Reform, (2), 15–24.
  • [31] Shi, W., Ndofor, H. A., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2020). Disciplining role of short sellers: Evidence from M&A activity. Journal of Management, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320912307
  • [32] Huang, B., Li, H., Liu, J., & Lei, J. (2023). Digital technological innovation and high-quality development of Chinese firms: Evidence from digital patents. Economic Research Journal, 58(3), 97–115.
  • [33] Guo, T., & Sun, G. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty, financing costs, and corporate innovation. International Finance Research, (10), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.16475/j.cnki.1006-1029.2021.10.008
  • [34] Li, D., & Bao, Y. (2024). The impact of new quality productive forces on firm performance. Finance and Economics, 39(5), 40–48.
  • [35] Zhang, Z., Zhang, N., & Xiao, T. (2025). Digital and green transformation and firm performance. Management Review, 37(11), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2025.11.008
  • [36] Tao, X., Chen, Y., Li, D., & Feng, X. (2025). ESG performance, green innovation, and firm performance. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 42(15), 87–97.
  • [37] Jiang, T. (2022). Mediation and moderation effects in causal inference research. China Industrial Economics, (5), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.05.005
  • [38] Li, H. (2026). New quality productive forces and rural revitalization. Statistics & Decision, 42(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2026.01.002
  • [39] Su, T., Guo, X., Yu, Y., & Wang, Q. (n.d.). Can digital transformation promote collaborative innovation? Journal of Systems Management, 1–18.
  • [40] Guo, W., & Kang, W. (2024). ESG performance, digital finance, and green technological innovation. Finance Monthly, 45(17), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2024.17.009

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published
Apr 15, 2026
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ruixuan Zhang. (2026). The Impact of New Quality Productive Forces on Firm Performance and Its Mechanisms. Financial Economics Research, 3(2), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.70267/fer.250302.6078