Exploring the development of Female Subjectivity through Eco-Feminism: An Analysis of the film Out of Africa
Main Article Content
Keywords
Eco-Feminism, Female Subjectivity, Out of Africa, Ethics of Care
Abstract
Eco-feminism has creatively merged feminism and environmental protection, highlighting the close connection between women and nature. While there are internal disagreements, eco-feminism emphasizes women's liberation and environmental protection as intertwined goals. The development of eco-feminism is linked to the awakening of female self-awareness, which provides a foundation for environmental efforts. The film Out of Africa depicts the protagonist's self-discovery in the natural environment, inspiring viewers to reflect on its relationship with nature. Ultimately, achieving ecological balance requires equal cooperation between genders and a new model of harmonious coexistence between humans and nature.
References
Blixen, K. (1937). Out of Africa, London, U.K.: Putnam.
Cao, A. P. (2008). “Betty Friedan’s The Second Stage and the Second-wave Feminism in the United States,” Journal of Anqing Normal University (Social Science Edition), vol. 4, pp. 62-65.
Carolyn, M. (1992). Radical Ecology, London, U.K.: Routledge.
Chen, M. L. (2006). “A Discussion of Ecofeminist Literary Criticism,” Qilu Journal, vol, 4, pp. 108-111.
Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique, New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Gaard, G. (1993). Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Griffin, S. (1978). Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Hu, Z. H. and Hu, T. T., (2013). “Toward Ecofeminist Criticism: The Ecological Structure and Reconstruction of Feminism in Ecofeminism,” Contemporary Literary Criticism, vol. 5, pp. 31-34.
Jardins, J. R. (2012). Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
King, Y. (1989). “The Ecology of Feminism and the Feminism of Ecology,” in Judith Plant (ed.), Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Eco-feminism, Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.
Li, G. M. (1994). “Women's Liberation and Female Subjectivity,” Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology (Social Science), vol. 4, pp. 49-52.
Luo, T. and Xie P., (2004). “Ecofeminism and Literary Criticism,” Seeker, vol. 4, pp. 176-180.
Midgley, M. (1997). Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature, London, U.K.: Routledge.
Nangong, M. F. and Zhu, H. M. and Wu, T. T. and Lv, L. T., (2011). Ecofeminist Literary Interpretation of Gender, Culture and Nature, Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, London, U.K.: Routledge.
Shiva, V. (1989). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development, London, U.K.: Zed Books.
Slote, M. (2007). The Ethics of Care and Empathy, London, U.K.: Routledge.
Sun, H. Y. (2009). “Transition from Edge to Center: Critique on Female and Nature by Eco-feminist,” Journal of Shaoguan University, vol. 2, pp. 35-38.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, London, U.K.: Routledge.
Wang, C. and Li, Q. X., (2010). “Evolution and Value of Ecofeminism,” Academic Exchange, vol. 11, pp. 49-52.
Wang, Y. C. (2006). “Technological Disenchantment and Human Liberation: A Review of the Frankfurt School’s Science and Technology Ethics Values,” Philosophical Research, vol. 12, pp. 108-112.
Warren, K. J. (2000). Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters, New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Wei, Q. Q. (2015). “After Transcending the Second: An Ecocritical Reading of Beauvoir,” Contemporary Foreign Literature, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 130-136.
Yuan, L. H. (2008). “A Study on the Harmonious Ethical Thought of Ecofeminism under Postmodern Discourse,” Master’s thesis, Southeast University.