Constructing Legitimacy and National Identity in Chinese State Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of People’s Daily, Xinhua News Agency and China Daily (2018–2024)

Main Article Content

Zhiguang Yang
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70267/ms.20260301.0119

Keywords

Chinese state media, political legitimacy, national identity, self/other discourse, critical discourse analysis

Abstract

This paper examines how Chinese state media construct national legitimacy and identity by portraying a positive national self in contrast to external others. The study analyses 120 articles published between 2018 and 2024 by People’s Daily, Xinhua News Agency and China Daily, covering political news reports, editorials and foreign-affairs commentaries. Drawing on Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis, the paper examines lexical choices, metaphorical framing, intertextual references and the links between textual features and wider socio-political practices. The findings show that China is repeatedly represented as stable, historically continuous, developmental and morally responsible, whereas external actors are often portrayed as inconsistent, intrusive or disruptive. These representations are produced through positive evaluative language, contrasts between cooperation and interference, and appeals to history and international norms. The article argues that such discursive practices support political legitimation by associating state authority with national achievement, moral governance and defensive nationalism. It contributes to the literature on media, power and identity by showing how legitimacy is constructed through routine discourse in contemporary Chinese state media.

Abstract 16 | PDF Downloads 11

References

  • [1] CAO, Q. (2019). Discursive construction of national and political identities in China: Political and cultural construction of the Chinese nation. In The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis. Routledge.
  • [2] LI, J. (2009). Intertextuality and national identity: discourse of national conflicts in daily newspapers in the United States and China. Discourse & Society, 20, 85–121.
  • [3] SALAS, M. F. & SILES, I. (2023). Pandemic populism and permanent campaigning: How Central American presidents build political legitimacy on Facebook. International Communication Gazette, 85, 580–600.
  • [4] GUTHRIE, D. (2012). China and globalization: The social, economic and political transformation of Chinese society. Routledge.
  • [5] WANG, H. (2003). China's new order: Society, politics, and economy in transition. Harvard University Press.
  • [6] SO, A. Y. & CHU, Y.-W. (2015). The global rise of China. John Wiley & Sons.
  • [7] LEE, C.-C. (2003). The global and the national of the Chinese media. Chinese media, global contexts, 1–31.
  • [8] CHAN, B. (2005). Imagining the homeland: The Internet and diasporic discourse of nationalism. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29, 336–368.
  • [9] KUZAI, E. (2025). Constructing self–other distinction in dialogic contexts: Beyond identity. Pragmatics.
  • [10] PETERS, B. (2005). Public discourse, identity and the problem of democratic legitimacy. Making the European polity. Reflexive integration in the EU, 84–123.
  • [11] MARSCHLICH, S. & INGENHOFF, D. (2023). The role of local news in constructing media legitimacy: How news media frames the sociopolitical efforts of multinational corporations in host countries. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28, 1–18.
  • [12] HAUNSS, S. (2007). Challenging legitimacy: Repertoires of contention, political claims-making, and collective action frames. In Legitimacy in an age of global politics. Springer.
  • [13] ZHANG, L. (2010). The rise of China: Media perception and implications for international politics. Journal of Contemporary China, 19, 233–254.
  • [14] SUN, W. (2018). Slow boat from China: public discourses behind the ‘going global’media policy. In Cultural Diplomacy: Beyond the National Interest? Routledge.
  • [15] YUNHAN, F. (2024). Dilemmas and Paths of International Communication of Chinese Culture in the Context of Exchanges and Mutual Enlightenment of World Civilizations. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 6.
  • [16] HULVEY, R. (2025). Discourse Power: How China Gains Global Influence. Available at SSRN 5183885.
  • [17] ANDEWEG, R. B. & AARTS, K. (2017). Studying political legitimacy. Findings, Implications, and the Uneasy Question, 193–206.
  • [18] ERMAN, E. & MÖLLER, N. (2025). The importance and limitation of epistemic norms in political theory. Political Studies Review, 23, 352–371.
  • [19] DEMIR, K. & BALTACı, H. (2025). THE CHANGING GROUND OF ORGANISATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: STATE POLICIES AND ORGANISATIONAL DISCOURSE IN THE BEER SECTOR IN TÜRKIYE. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 395–425.
  • [20] ADEBAYO, D. O., SARAH, I. O., BASSEY, A. K., OMONFOMHAN, I. O., BASHIR, P. I., KEHINDE, O. A. & CHIOMA, I. (2025). Rhetoric of transition: A pragmatic analysis of inaugural speeches under extraordinary political succession in Nigeria. Path of Science, 11, 8006–8027.
  • [21] GEISLER, M. E. (2005). National symbols, fractured identities: Contesting the national narrative. UPNE.
  • [22] WODAK, R. (2009). Discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press.
  • [23] ANDREOULI, E. (2010). Identity, positioning and self-other relations. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 14.1–14.13.
  • [24] BREWSTER, K. R. (2020). Reflections of self and other: Discursive possibilities for solidarity in conceptions of sameness and difference. Qualitative Psychology, 7, 267.
  • [25] BAMBERG, M. (2005). Narrative discourse and identities. Narratology beyond literary criticism, 213–237.
  • [26] MOLTER, V. & DIRESTA, R. (2020). Pandemics & propaganda: How Chinese state media creates and propagates CCP coronavirus narratives. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1.
  • [27] ZOU, S. (2023). Restyling propaganda: popularized party press and the making of soft propaganda in China. Information, Communication & Society, 26, 201–217.
  • [28] ZISKIN, M. B. (2019). Critical discourse analysis and critical qualitative inquiry: data analysis strategies for enhanced understanding of inference and meaning. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32, 606–631.
  • [29] DUTOIT, A.-S. (2017). THE CHINESE SELF, THE OTHER, AND WESTERN EUROPEAN MEDIA: A CROSS-MEDIA CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON CHINESE SOFT POWER NARRATIVES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE'ONE BELT, ONE ROAD'INITIATIVE AND THE ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK. Central European University.
  • [30] YANG, Z. (2024). Chinese discourses of identity and legitimacy: representations of self and other in the 2019 Hong Kong protests. Newcastle University.
  • [31] GU, J. (2024). The discursive representations of Africanness and blackness in Chinese cyberspace: a critical discourse-historical analysis.
  • [32] FARHADYTOOLI, M. (2025). Studying the fundamental approaches to critical discourse analysis: Disclose the criticism of power and ideology. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 5, 156–164.
  • [33] YANG, Y. (2023). Ideology in critical discourse study: A review of literature. Journal of the University of Ruhuna, 11.
  • [34] BERKOVICH, I. & BENOLIEL, P. (2024). Critical discourse analysis: Language, ideology, and power. Analysing education policy. Routledge.
  • [35] VAN DIJK, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In The handbook of discourse analysis, 466–485.
  • [36] KhosraviNik M (2015). Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy: Self and Other in representations of Iran's nuclear programme. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • [37] FAIRCLOUGH, I. & FAIRCLOUGH, N. (2013). Argument, deliberation, dialectic and the nature of the political: A CDA perspective. Political Studies Review, 11, 336–344.
  • [38] MORALES, E., HODSON, J., O’MEARA, V., GRUZD, A. & MAI, P. (2025). Online toxic speech as positioning acts: Hate as discursive mechanisms for othering and belonging. New media & society, 14614448251338493.
  • [39] RODERICK, I. (2018). Multimodal critical discourse analysis as ethical praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 15, 154–168.
  • [40] DURAN MARQUES, J. F. (2025). A critical discourse analysis of the construction of otherness in the 4T government of Mexico through official educational discourse. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
  • [41] LI, T. & ZHU, Y. (2020). How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse. Discourse & Society, 31, 153–171.
  • [42] QAZI, H. (2020). National identity in a postcolonial society: A foucauldian discourse analysis of Pakistan’s national curriculum textbooks and their social practices in schools for shaping students’ national belonging. University of Leicester.
  • [43] MA, L. & CROSTHWAITE, P. (2025). Constructing China’s national image through political discourse: A corpus-based diachronic analysis of government work reports (2001–2025). Applied Corpus Linguistics, 100179.
  • [44] YAN, J. (2025). The Comparison of the National Identity Construction at Sporting Mega Events in Asia and Globally.
  • [45] BEDIR, U. & ÖZTUNÇ, M. (2022). Symbolic construction of national identity: a qualitative analysis of Ngos instagram posts on national days. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 12, 192–211.
  • [46] REUß, A. (2025). The Securitization of Nationalism: Self-Determination, Ideology, and National Identity. Evolving Security Threats and Identity in the United Arab Emirates: The Politics of Perceptions. Springer.
  • [47] FUKUYAMA, F. (2018). Why national identity matters. Journal of Democracy, 29, 5–15.
  • [48] TRIANDAFYLLIDOU, A. (1998). National identity and the'other'. Ethnic and racial studies, 21, 593–612.
  • [49] WILLIAMS, K. (2018). Three strategies for attaining legitimacy in policy knowledge: Coherence in identity, process and outcome. Public Administration, 96, 53–69.
  • [50] KURUPPU, S. C., MILNE, M. J. & TILT, C. A. (2019). Gaining, maintaining and repairing organisational legitimacy: When to report and when not to report. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32, 2062–2087.
  • [51] REYES, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & society, 22, 781–807.
  • [52] GÖZKAMAN, A. (2025). From discourse to legitimacy: narratives as instruments of influence in international relations. Global Discourse, 15, 264–280.
  • [53] THORNE, S. (2025). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice. Routledge.
  • [54] MAHMOUD, H. A.-L. & AL-THALAB, H. S. A. (2024). A Socio-Cognitive Analysis of the Self/other Representation in Bush’s Speech. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 8, 121–135.
  • [55] MA, E. K.-W. (2005). Rethinking media studies: The case of China. De-westernizing media studies, 17–28.
  • [56] ZHAO, Y. (2012). Understanding China’s media system in a world historical context. Comparing media systems beyond the Western world, 143–176.
  • [57] ASHRAF, M. U., ANSER, F., MEHMOOD, A., HUSSAIN, I., ABDULLAEVA, I., SAPAYEV, V. & MASHARIPOVA, G. (2025). MEDIATING NATIONAL IDENTITY: A QUALITATIVE LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF CGTN'S CROSS-CULTURAL DISCOURSE AND FRAMING STRATEGIES. Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government, 23.
  • [58] HAIDER, A. S. (2016). A Corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of the Arab Uprisings. University of Canterbury.
  • [59] HARBI, R. (2020). Reader Response to Literary Political Discourse: A Critical Text World Theory Approach. University of Nottingham (United Kingdom).
  • [60] JHA, A. & KUMAR, S. (2023). Linguistic strategies in media discourse analysis of global politics. ijpmonline, 2, 8–12.
  • [61] PARR, C. L. (2016). Representations of Islam: A Comparative Critical Discourse Analysis of Australian Newspapers. University of Newcastle, Australia.
  • [62] ZHAO, J. & ZHANG, D. (2024). Visual propaganda in chinese central and local news agencies: a douyin case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 588.

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published
May 29, 2026
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Yang, Z. (2026). Constructing Legitimacy and National Identity in Chinese State Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of People’s Daily, Xinhua News Agency and China Daily (2018–2024). Media Studies, 3(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.70267/ms.20260301.0119