Cultural Heterotopias and the Spatial Logic of Guilt and Shame: A Comparative Reading of The Scarlet Letter and The New Year’s Sacrifice
Main Article Content
Keywords
The Scarlet Letter, The New Year’s Sacrifice, heterotopia, spatial power, comparison
Abstract
This paper offers a culturally oriented comparative reading of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter (1850) and Lu Xun’s The New Year’s Sacrifice (1924) through Michel Foucault’s theory of heterotopia. It explores how central and peripheral spaces encode cultural values and power: the scaffold and the ancestral hall are examined as disciplinary sites through which Puritan and Confucian cultural rituals regulate the body, gender, and moral conduct; the forest and the Earth God Temple are read as counter-sites where Hester and Xianglin’s Wife perform resistance that remains culturally conditioned and limited. By juxtaposing the two texts, the paper highlights the contrast between Western guilt culture and Chinese shame culture in their spatial logic of punishment, confession, shame, and social exclusion. It thereby treats heterotopia as a culturally situated concept and asks how far it can be translated across cultural contexts to illuminate non-Western literary spaces without erasing their local meanings.
References
- [1] Matthiessen, F. O. (1941). American Renaissance: Art and expression in the age of Emerson and Whitman. Oxford University Press.
- [2] Lawrence, D. H. (1923). Studies in classic American literature. T. Seltzer.
- [3] James, H. (1879). Hawthorne. Macmillan.
- [4] Hsia, C. T. (2016). A history of modern Chinese fiction (S. M. Liu et al., Trans.) [In Chinese]. Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
- [5] Jameson, F. (1986). Third-world literature in the era of multinational capitalism. Social Text, (15), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/466493
- [6] Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces (J. Miskowiec, Trans.). Diacritics, 16(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/464648
- [7] Yuan, X. H., & Yang, J. C. (2005). On the spatial narrative structure and artistic effect of The Scarlet Letter [in Chinese]. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University, 21(6), 37–40.
- [8] Mao, L. Y. (2009). The construction of multiple spaces: On the spatial narrative art of The Scarlet Letter [in Chinese]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 29(5), 44–49.
- [9] Fu, X. D. (2015). Narratological spatiotemporal theory and the narrative art of The Scarlet Letter [in Chinese]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology (Social Sciences), 33(2), 81–83.
- [10] Yu, H. (2024). Multiple spaces and the transformation of ethical identity in The Scarlet Letter [in Chinese]. Zhengzhou Normal Education, 13(5), 76–79.
- [11] Zhang, Z. L. (2023). The submission of the “rebel” Hester: A study of spatial ethics in The Scarlet Letter [in Chinese]. Mingjia Mingzuo [Masters and Masterpieces], (1), 109–111.
- [12] Pringle, M. (2007). The scarlet lever: Hester’s civil disobedience. ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance, 53(1), 31–55.
- [13] Levy, L. B. (1969). The landscape modes of The Scarlet Letter. Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 23(4), 377–392.
- [14] TAKAO N. Sex and the city: the reconstruction of middle-class urban consciousness in The Scarlet Letter [J]. The Japanese Journal of American Studies, 2008(19): 25–42.
- [15] Liu, G. Z., & Zheng, Q. Q. (2004). On the symbolism and archetype of the wilderness in The Scarlet Letter [in Chinese]. Foreign Literature Studies, 26(1), 104–108, 173–174.
- [16] DOYLE L. “A” for Atlantic: The colonizing force of Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter [J]. American Literature, 2007, 79(2): 243–273.
- [17] MCCAY J. Figure (1996), ground, and gender in Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter: A Romance [D]. Huntsville: University of Alabama in Huntsville, 17.
- [18] Jiang, X. P. (2010). The Scarlet Letter in the context of “power–discourse” [in Chinese]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 32(8), 50–57, 44.
- [19] Yu, X. M. (2008). Spatial narrative in Call to Arms and Wandering (Doctoral dissertation) [in Chinese]. Central China Normal University.
- [20] Lei, Y. P., & Yu, X. Z. (2024). Creating the Luzhen people’s sense of power and permanence: One meaning-expressing function of narrative form in The New Year’s Sacrifice [in Chinese]. Lu Xun Research Monthly, (11), 41–50, 60.
- [21] Chen, J., & Zhang, Q. M. (2021). Space and embedding: An analysis of the deep narrative structure of The New Year’s Sacrifice [in Chinese]. Yuwen Jiaoxue Tongxun [Bulletin of Chinese Language Teaching], (13), 56–59.
- [22] Liu, H. Y. (2005). Ritual-propriety space and women’s survival: Rereading The New Year’s Sacrifice [in Chinese]. Lu Xun Research Monthly, (6), 32–37.
- [23] Ko, D. (1994). Teachers of the inner chambers: Women and culture in seventeenth-century China. Stanford University Press.
- [24] Zhang, M. Y. (2012). The soul’s cry under religious and ritual oppression: A comparison of The Scarlet Letter and The New Year’s Sacrifice [in Chinese]. Shidai Wenxue [Times Literature], (4), 211–212.
- [25] Zhao, H. R. (2004). Human beings should not be living offerings on the religious altar: A comparison of the heroines in The Scarlet Letter and The New Year’s Sacrifice [in Chinese]. Journal of the Engineering College of the Armed Police Force, (5), 53–56.
- [26] Liu, M. J. (2020). Self-articulation under the construction of the Other: A comparative study of Hester and Xianglin’s Wife [in Chinese]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Social Sciences), 21(3), 48–53.
- [27] Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.
- [28] Hawthorne, N. (2007). The Scarlet Letter (B. Harding, Ed.; C. Weinstein, Introd.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1850)
- [29] Lu, X. (2005). Complete works of Lu Xun (Vol. 2). People’s Literature Publishing House.
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.