Study on the Intricacies of Teacher and Learner Agency in Foreign Language Instruction

Main Article Content

Tenglong Gong

Keywords

teacher agency, learner agency, English teaching and learning

Abstract

Language instruction has always revolved around the idea of agency. Learner agency has been significantly impacted by the educational objective that students become capable of independent learning. Learner agency is the term used to describe students’ deliberate efforts to learn as opposed to the demands placed on them by their teachers, the curriculum, and other factors. The majority of schools in our traditional teaching mode typically use a one-size-fits-all strategy to accommodate groupings of students. Many students either became passive or felt disenfranchised. Examining the topic of agency is crucial in light of the ongoing demand to improve students’ independent learning and teachers’ ability to take charge of their instruction. By examining the elements of teachers’ and students’ agentic systems, this paper seeks to advance a more comprehensive understanding of agency. In order to help instructors and students become more proficient in teaching and learning English, this study also aims to investigate the intricate aspects of learner and teacher agency, which present a challenge for educational theory.

Abstract 36 | PDF Downloads 19

References

  • Ahearn, L. M., (2001). Language and agency. Annual review of anthropology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 109-137.
  • Allwright, D. and Hanks, J., (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Benson, P., (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning, Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Biesta, G., (2015). How does a competent teacher become a good teacher? In: Heilbronn, R., and Foreman-Peck, L. (eds.) Philosophical Perspectives on Teacher Education. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 3-22.
  • Biesta, G., Priestley, M. and Robinson, S., (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and teaching, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 624-640.
  • Biesta, G. and Tedder, M., (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Working Paper 5 University of Exeter.
  • Biesta, G. J. J., (2010). Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, London: Paradigm Publishers.
  • Carter, B. and Sealey, A., (2000). Language, structure and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3-20.
  • Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A., (1998). What is agency? American journal of sociology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 962-1023.
  • Fullan, M., (2003). Change forces with a Vengeance, London: Routledge.
  • Funder, D. C., (2001). The really, really fundamental attribution error. Psychological Inquiry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21-23.
  • Gao, X. S., (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context, Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Giddens, A., (1984). The constitution of society, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Hillier, Y., (2012). Reflective Teaching in Further and Adult Education, (3rd ed.) London: Continuum.
  • Huang, J. P. and Benson, P., (2013). Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign and second language education. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 7-28.
  • Kohonen, V., (2009). Autonomy, authenticity and agency in language education: The European language portfolio as a pedagogical resource. In: Kohonen, V., and Moilanen, P. (eds.) Language Education, Teacher Professionalism and Intercultural Agency. Helsinki: OKKA Foundation, pp. 12-38.
  • Lantolf, J. P., (2002). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In: Kaplan, R. B. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104-114.
  • Lantolf, J. P., (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lantolf, J. P. and Pavlenko, A., (2014). (S) econd (L) anguage (A) ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In: Breen, M. P. (ed.) Learner Contributions to Language Learning. Harlow:: Pearson Education., pp. 141-158.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D., (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 141-165.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L., (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lipponen, L. and Kumpulainen, K., (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 812-819.
  • McKay, S. L. and Wong, S.-L. C., (1996). Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard educational review, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 577-609.
  • Mercer, S., (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 427-436.
  • Mercer, S., (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, no. 2.
  • Morita, N., (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. Tesol Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 573-603.
  • Norton, B., (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change, London: Longman.
  • Norton, B. and Toohey, K., (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL quarterly, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 307-322.
  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G. and Robinson, S., (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? In: Kneyber, R., and Evers, J. (eds.) Flip the System: Changing Education from the Bottom up. London: Routledge, pp. 134-148.
  • Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J. and Soini, T., (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of educational change, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 303-325.
  • Ray, J. M., (2009). A template analysis of teacher agency at an academically successful dual language school. Journal of advanced academics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 110-141.
  • Roberts, J. and Graham, S., (2008). Agency and conformity in school-based teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1401-1412.
  • Sugrue, C. and Solbrekke, T. D., (2014). Professional responsibility: New horizons of praxis, New York: Routledge.
  • Taylor, C., (1985). Human agency and language (Philosophical papers I), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ticknor, A. S., (2015). Critical considerations in becoming literacy educators: Pre-service teachers rehearsing agency and negotiating risk. Teaching Education, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 383-399.
  • van Lier, L., (2008). Agency in the classroom. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages. London: London: Equinox, pp. 163-186.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.