Human-Robot Interaction in Museum Exhibition Assembly: A Framework for Adaptive Collaboration
Main Article Content
Keywords
museum, human-robot interaction, exhibition assembly, adaptive design
Abstract
Exhibition assembly in museums represents a critical phase in translating abstract curatorial concepts into tangible physical forms. Unlike structured industrial settings, museum environments are often unstructured and unpredictable, posing considerable challenges for human-robot interaction (HRI). This study proposes an adaptive collaboration framework for HRI, specifically tailored to meet the unique demands of museum exhibition assembly. The framework is structured around three core interaction mechanisms: behavioral coordination, intention sharing, and role collaboration. It addresses key challenges such as the sensitivity of cultural artifacts, environmental complexity, and the necessity of establishing trust between humans and robots. To improve collaborative accuracy, the framework incorporates hierarchical task modeling, adaptive behavior adjustment, and multimodal information exchange. For intention sharing, it introduces multidimensional situational modeling, context-aware intention inference algorithms, and perceivable feedback systems. To optimize role allocation, it employs a flexible role assignment strategy, adaptive interaction patterns, and clear role status indicators. By extending HRI research beyond industrial applications, the framework offers novel insights into collaborative systems within complex cultural contexts. Nevertheless, further empirical validation and context-specific analysis are required to fully bridge the gap between theoretical development and practical implementation.
References
- Awais, M., Saeed, M. Y., Malik, M. S. A., Younas, M., & Asif, S. R. I. (2020). Intention based comparative analysis of human-robot interaction. IEEE Access, 8, 205821-205835.
- Bazunu, H. U., Edo, P. A., Isiramen, C. O., & Ottuh, P. O. O. (2025). Robotic Intervention in Preserving Artifacts: The Case of the Bini Cultural Artifacts in Nigeria. Rupkatha Journal, 17(1), 2.
- Che, Y., Okamura, A. M., & Sadigh, D. (2020). Efficient and trustworthy social navigation via explicit and implicit robot-human communication. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 36(3), 692-707.
- Correll, N., & Rus, D. (2013). Architectures and control of networked robotic systems. Handbook of collective robotics: fundamentals and challenges, 81-103.
- Earle, W. (2013). Cultural education: Redefining the role of museums in the 21st century. Sociology Compass, 7(7), 533-546.
- Germak, C., Lupetti, M. L., Giuliano, L., & Ng, M. E. K. (2015). Robots and cultural heritage: New museum experiences. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 7(2), 47-57.
- Giele, T. R., Mioch, T., Neerincx, M. A., & Meyer, J. J. (2015). Dynamic task allocation for human-robot teams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence. Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 117-124.
- Han, J., Lee, J., & Cho, Y. (2005). Evolutionary role model and basic emotions of service robots originated from computers. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Roman, Italy, pp. 30-35.
- Hein, G. E. (2006). Museum education. A companion to museum studies, 340-352.
- Hellou, M., Lim, J., Gasteiger, N., Jang, M., & Ahn, H. S. (2022). Technical methods for social robots in museum settings: An overview of the literature. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(8), 1767-1786.
- Kamal, H. M. (2022). Planning for Artefact Installation and the Challenges of Implementation: Behind the Scenes in the King Tutankhamun Gallery at the Grand Egyptian Museum. Studies in Conservation, 67(1), 122-129.
- Kim, S., Hernandez, I., Nussbaum, M. A., & Lim, S. (2024). Teleoperator-robot-human interaction in manufacturing: Perspectives from industry, robot manufacturers, and researchers. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 12(1-2), 28-40.
- Li, S., Wang, R., Zheng, P., & Wang, L. (2021). Towards proactive human-robot collaboration: A foreseeable cognitive manufacturing paradigm. Journal of manufacturing systems, 60, 547-552.
- Messeri, C., Bicchi, A., Zanchettin, A. M., & Rocco, P. (2022). A dynamic task allocation strategy to mitigate the human physical fatigue in collaborative robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2), 2178-2185.
- Mohammad, Y. F., & Nishida, T. (2007). Intention through interaction: toward mutual intention in real world interactions. In New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence: 20th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems. Kyoto, Japan, pp. 26-29.
- Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2023). The future of the human-machine interface (HMI) in society 5.0. Future Internet, 15(5), 162.
- Oshio, K., Kaneko, K., & Kubota, N. (2021). Multi-scopic simulation for human-robot interactions based on multi-objective behavior coordination. In International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics. Beijing, China, pp. 3-8.
- Riley, J. M., Strater, L. D., Chappell, S. L., Connors, E. S., & Endsley, M. R. (2016). Situation awareness in human-robot interaction: Challenges and user interface requirements. Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations, 171-192.
- Runhovde, S. R. (2021). Risking Munch. The art of balancing accessibility and security in museums. Journal of risk research, 24(9), 1113-1126.
- Sasabuchi, K., Wake, N., & Ikeuchi, K. (2020). Task-oriented motion mapping on robots of various configuration using body role division. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 413-420.
- Shan, M., Narula, K., Wong, Y. F., Worrall, S., Khan, M., Alexander, P., & Nebot, E. (2020). Demonstrations of cooperative perception: Safety and robustness in connected and automated vehicle operations. Sensors, 21(1), 200.
- Shen, J. (2023). Monitoring and controlling of the micro-environment in a special exhibition in the Shanghai Museum. SN Applied Sciences, 5(11), 298.
- Sheridan, T. B. (2016). Human-robot interaction: status and challenges. Human factors, 58(4), 525-532.
- Song, N., He, X., & Kuang, Y. (2022). Research hotspots and trends analysis of user experience: Knowledge maps visualization and theoretical framework construction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 990663.
- Stuedahl, D., & Smordal, O. (2011). Designing for young visitors' co-composition of doubts in cultural historical exhibitions. Computers and Composition, 28(3), 215-223.
- Tzortzi, K. (2007). Museum building design and exhibition layout. In Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 72.
- Velentza, A. M., Heinke, D., & Wyatt, J. (2020). Museum robot guides or conventional audio guides? An experimental study. Advanced Robotics, 34(24), 1571-1580.
- Villani, V., Pini, F., Leali, F., & Secchi, C. (2018). Survey on human-robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications. Mechatronics, 55, 248-266.
- Wang, N., & Xia, L. (2019). Human-exhibition interaction (HEI) in designing exhibitions: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 292-302.
- Yi, X., Liu, Z., Li, H., & Jiang, B. (2024). Immersive experiences in museums for elderly with cognitive disorders: a user-centered design approach. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1971.
- Zou, R., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Chu, G., Zhao, J., & Cai, H. (2023). A Novel Human Intention Prediction Approach Based on Fuzzy Rules through Wearable Sensing in Human-Robot Handover. Biomimetics, 8(4), 358.
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.