A Comparative Analysis of Political Legitimacy in the Great Learning and Plato's Republic
Main Article Content
Keywords
political legitimacy, the great learning, Plato’s Republic, Confucianism, comparative political philosophy
Abstract
Political legitimacy constitutes a foundational problem in political philosophy, concerning the justification of authority and the conditions under which power is recognized and obeyed. This paper offers a comparative analysis of political legitimacy as articulated in two classical texts of the Axial Age: The Great Learning in the Confucian tradition and Plato’s Republic in ancient Greek philosophy. Situating both works within their respective historical and intellectual contexts, the study argues that they present distinct yet structurally comparable models of legitimacy. Confucian political legitimacy is grounded primarily in moral virtue and the Mandate of Heaven, emphasizing internal moral cultivation, ethical governance, and popular support as manifestations of Heavenly will. By contrast, Platonic legitimacy derives from external transcendence, locating political authority in the philosopher-king’s grasp of eternal truth and the Form of the Good. Through textual analysis and conceptual comparison, this paper examines how virtue, wisdom, justice, and truth function as sources of political legitimacy in the two traditions. By highlighting both their shared rejection of coercive power and their divergent transcendental foundations, this study seeks to contribute to comparative political philosophy and to reflect on the contemporary relevance of classical legitimacy theories for modern governance, leadership ethics, and education.
References
- [1] Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Bedminster Press.
- [2] Locke, J. (1980). Second treatise of government (C. B. Macpherson, Ed.). Hackett Publishing.
- [3] Chan, W.-t. (1963). Da xue [The Great Learning]. In A source book in Chinese philosophy (pp. 84–89). Princeton University Press.
- [4] Plato. (2007). The Republic (2nd rev. ed.). Penguin.
- [5] Jaspers, K. (1953). The origin and goal of history (M. Bullock, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- [6] Zheng, X., & Kong, Y. (n.d.). Da xue zhengyi [Correct meaning of the Great Learning].
- [7] Zhu, X. (n.d.). Da xue zhangju jizhu [Collected commentaries on the Great Learning in chapters and verses].
- [8] Lou, Y. (2009). Tian yu ren gui: Shi xi Mengzi guanyu junzhu quanli hefaxing de lunshuo [On the legitimacy of monarchial power in Mencius]. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities Sciences), 23(3), 138–139.
- [9] Brown, E. (2005). Plato on the rule of wisdom. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01980.x
- [10] Li, Y. (2024, July 15). Bolatu “lixiangguo” san zhong zhengzhi moshi de zhenglun [The debate on the three political models in Plato’s Republic]. Xueshu Jiaoliu [Academic Exchange]. https://doi.org/10.13761/j.cnki.cn23-1073/c.2024.04.005
- [11] Studebaker, B. M. (2023). Plato as a theorist of legitimacy. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 19(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-bja10030
- [12] Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
- [13] Liu, D. (2020). Kongzi yu Bolatu zhiguo sixiang zhi bijiao hujian [A comparative study of the governing thoughts of Confucius and Plato]. Kongzi Yanjiu [Confucius Studies], (2), 79–96.
- [14] Shang shu [The Book of Documents].
- [15] Gu, J. (1926–1941). Gu shi bian [Discourses on ancient history] (Vols. 1–7). Pushe.
- [16] Wang, P., & Sheng, X. (2025). Zou Yan “wude zhongshi lun” sixiang suyuan [Tracing the intellectual origins of Zou Yan’s theory of the cycle of five virtues]. Hubei Social Sciences, (4), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.13660/j.cnki.42-1112/c.016538
- [17] Wang, M., & Wang, Z. (2025). Xianqin tianren heyi guan de xingcheng yu fazhan [The formation and development of the pre-Qin concept of the unity of Heaven and humanity]. Zhongzhou Academic Journal, (10), 126–132.
- [18] Zhengzhi zhengdangxing de gujin Zhongxi duihua [A dialogue on political legitimacy: Ancient and modern, Chinese and Western]. (2012). Zhengzhi Sixiangshi [History of Political Thought], (1), 118–163.
- [19] Wang, J. (2020). Lunyu yu lixiangguo de zhengzhi sixiang bijiao yanjiu [A comparative study of the political thought in the Analects and the Republic] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Jilin University.
- [20] Machiavelli, N. (1998). The prince (H. C. Mansfield, Trans.; 2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
- [21] Rousseau, J.-J. (1968). The social contract (M. Cranston, Trans.). Penguin Books.
- [22] Zhang, Z. (2021). Lun zhengzhi quanli de zhengdangxing—Jiyu Lusuo “shehui qiyue lun” de tanjiu [On the legitimacy of political power] [Master’s thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology].
- [23] Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
- [24] Taylor, A. E. (2001). Plato: The man and his work. Dover Publications.
- [25] Strauss, L. (1978). The city and man. University of Chicago Press.
- [26] Popper, K. R. (2020). The open society and its enemies (Vol. 1: The spell of Plato). Princeton University Press.
- [27] Ren, J. (2004). Zhongxi zhengzhi sixiang bijiao de zhengdangxing wenti [The legitimacy question in the comparative study of Chinese and Western political thought]. Zhongshan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Social Science Edition)], 44(6), 177–182, 267.
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.