A Three-Dimension Perspective of Individual, Community and Platform in the Literature Review on the Motivational Mechanisms of Fan Labour in the Digital Age

Main Article Content

Yufei Li
School of Public Management, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110000, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70267/ms.v3n3.5868

Keywords

fan labor, affective labor, digital labor, platform algorithms, fandom culture

Abstract

Digital technology has changed the ways fans participate in cultural activities. Practices such as chart voting, comment control, and data production gradually become unpaid, organized, and affective digital labor. In available research, scholars either emphasize capitalist exploitation or highlight fan autonomy, and the concept of affective labor is inconsistently used. The three-level dynamics of individual psychology, community culture, and platform regulation lack integration. With this background, this paper reviews the literature on affective labor, audience commodity, digital labor, and fan culture, in order to figure out why fans continue to labor voluntarily and how multiple dynamics interact. Through comparison of theoretical genealogies and literature integration, the research constructs a three-dimensional framework of individual, community, and platform, which thereby explains that fan labor is neither pure exploitation nor complete liberation, instead, it is a complex practice pulled by three forces. Meanwhile, this paper hopes that future research can move beyond the either/or judgment of exploitation and liberation, and focus more on fans’ own role in labor and how fans produce meaning.

Abstract 50 | PDF Downloads 18

References

  • [1]Xiaoling Wang, Shiyuan She. (2026). Affective labor in the digital age: Theoretical genealogy and practical significance. Culture and Art Studies, (3), 15–23+112.
  • [2]Liang Wang. (2022). The cultural turn in affective labor research. Zhejiang Academic Journal, (4), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.16235/j.cnki.33-1005/c.2022.04.006
  • [3]Fangru Liu. (2019). The theoretical source and the foreign research status of affective labor. Journalism and Mass Communication Monthly, (12), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.15897/j.cnki.cn51-1046/g2.20191216.001
  • [4]Jinhan Wang. (2018). How does “labor” become communication? — Paradigm shift and theoretical logic from “audience commodity” to “digital labor”. Journalism and Mass Communication Monthly, (10), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.15897/j.cnki.cn51-1046/g2.2018.10.007
  • [5]Shihua Chen. (2012). The theoretical origin and future direction of the “audience commodity thesis”. News Research, (1), 3–5.
  • [6]Jincao Cao & Liang Yuan. (2022). From audience commodity to the uncertainty of digital labor: Labor research from the perspective of critical political economy. Youth Journalist, (12), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.15997/j.cnki.qnjz.2022.12.015
  • [7]Cencen Hu. (2018). Online communities, fanatic consumption, and free labor — Trends in recent fan culture research. China Youth Study, (6), 5–12+77. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2018.0083
  • [8]Yunong Zhang, Xian Cao & Zhenjia Fan. (2026). Emotionally driven digital labor: Irrational information behaviors among fans. Library Tribune, 46 (6), 126–135.
  • [9]Xiao Mei. (2020). Positive experiences in emotional labor: Deep acting, symbolic boundaries, and labor autonomy. Society, 40 (2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.15992/j.cnki.31-1123/c.2020.02.004
  • [10]Hua Xu & Jingying Chen. (2024). Affective labor in the digital age: Power construction and exercise paths of big fans in fandom culture. Journal of Bohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 46 (5), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.13831/j.cnki.issn.1672-8254.2024.05.015
  • [11]Yixuan Wang. (2020). The formation and control of emotional labor in the network fans community — Taking the Moonlight fan site as an example. Study and Practice, (10), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.19624/j.cnki.cn42-1005/c.2020.10.013
  • [12]Xin Zhuang & Shan Dong. (2019). Consensus manufacturing and labor exploitation in affective labor — An analysis based on Weibo celebrity fan data groups. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 56 (6), 32–42.
  • [13]Meidi Huang & Haobin Wang. (2022). Discipline logic in fans communities in the digital age — Analysis of interaction between YJT fans club and fans. Journal of Nantong University (Social Sciences Edition), 38 (4), 101–111.
  • [14]Cheng Fang & Yiwen Xia. (2022). Empowerment and exploitation: Fan “voting” behavior from the perspective of digital labor. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 37 (2), 16–29.
  • [15]Qing Yan & Baoer Song. (2023). Issue renewal and perspective transformation in fan culture research. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 44 (7), 136–146.
  • [16]Jianxin Zhou & Furu Wang. (2024). Digital affective labor in the cultural industry: A new form of labor. Jianghai Academic Journal, (6), 151–159+256.
  • [17]Yixuan Liu & Jianping He. (2021). From “digital labor” to “emotional labor”: Research on the “labor” logic of the audience of live broadcast fans. Frontier, (3), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.14129/j.cnki.forwordposition.2021.03.012
  • [18]Wenjie Zhang. (2022). The electronic sports and fan culture in digital era. Youth Studies, (3), 50–62+95. https://doi.org/10.27017/j.cnki.qnyj.2022.03.005
  • [19]Qing Yan & Meiling Du. (2022). Cultivating “positive-energy fans”: A study of platform governance of fan culture — Based on an investigation of the Weibo platform. Journalist, (12), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.16057/j.cnki.31-1171/g2.2022.12.004
  • [20]Man Li. (2024). Affective labor: Deconstructing data production behavior in fan communities. Journal of Hunan Open University, (1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.19785/j.cnki.hnddxb.2024.01.011
  • [21]Guoqiang Liu & Huiqin Su. (2022). The obscured subject: Rethinking the characterization of fans under the paradigm of labor theory — Taking Weibo “comment control” as an example. Contemporary Communication, (1), 56–61+66.
  • [22]Hanning Gao. (2022). The war of “digital laborers”: “Fandom” chaos and the idol industry production mechanism in the Internet era. Literature and Art Theory and Criticism, (4), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.16532/j.cnki.1002-9583.2022.04.014
  • [23]Ying Jiang. (2020). Affective labor of Internet users from the perspective of digital labor theory. New Media Research, 6 (6), 94–96+99. https://doi.org/10.16604/j.cnki.issn2096-0360.2020.06.036
  • [24]Shuyuan Jiang & Weixiao Zhang. (2024). The alienation logic and ethical reconstruction of fan affective labor. Journal of Beijing Union University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 22 (6), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.16255/j.cnki.11-5117c.2024.0065
  • [25]Shichao Zhang & Cencen Hu. (2021). Fans, platforms, capital, and the state: Fandom anti-defamation and its governance from a multi-interactive perspective. Study and Practice, (7), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.19624/j.cnki.cn42-1005/c.2021.07.015

Article Sidebar

Full Text
PDF
Information
Copy Publication Information
Published
Oct 29, 2026
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026)
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Li, Y. (2026). A Three-Dimension Perspective of Individual, Community and Platform in the Literature Review on the Motivational Mechanisms of Fan Labour in the Digital Age. Media Studies, 3(3), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.70267/ms.v3n3.5868