A Review of Research on the Communication Effects and Ethical Controversies of AIGC Online Micro-Short Dramas

Main Article Content

Tongqi Li

Keywords

AI short drama, online micro-short drama, AIGC

Abstract

With the deepening application of AIGC technology, production logic, communication mechanisms, and ethical boundaries have become highly discussed issues in online micro-short dramas. Taking journal literature published from 2020 to 2026 as the core texts, this paper reviews existing studies from three dimensions: technological production, audience acceptance, and ethical controversies. The study finds that the technological production dimension has revealed the evolutionary path by which AIGC shifts from a tool to a subject; the audience acceptance dimension has formed a progressive understanding from viewing motivations to addiction mechanisms and then to aesthetic transformation; and the ethical controversy dimension focuses on four core issues: alienation of subjectivity, copyright infringement, algorithmic risks, and distortion of the pseudo-environment. However, insufficient dialogue still exists among the three sections. Studies on technological production and ethical risks focus on the production end and the text end, while audience studies concentrate on the consumption end, and systematic attention is still lacking to the possible logical chain through which communication effects lead to ethical controversies. Future research may deepen the study of the uniqueness of addiction mechanisms in AI micro-short dramas under an analytical framework that integrates the three sections, and may further promote empirical investigation of copyright infringement and deep synthesis governance.

Abstract 35 | PDF Downloads 28

References

  • [1] Zhang, Z., & Yuan, X. (2025). Technological empowerment and narrative innovation in the AIGC short-drama model. Television Research, (12), 19-22.
  • [2] Zhao, H., & Bi, J. (2024). Innovative exploration of AIGC micro-short dramas in a generative media environment: Technology-driven development, integrated innovation, and audiovisual transformation. Contemporary Television, (12), 15-21.
  • [3] Yang, Q., & Suo, F. (2025). Narrative exploration and reflection on subjectivity in micro-short dramas in the AIGC era. China Television, (9), 76-83.
  • [4] Zhang, Z., & Nie, C. (2026). The creative mechanism and plural ecology of AIGC online micro-short dramas. China Cyberspace, (1), 52-56.
  • [5] Jiang, N. (2025). AIGC + micro-short dramas: Database narrative, cross-code montage, and seamless aesthetics. China Television, (4), 76-82.
  • [6] Zhang, B. (2025). Research on the influence of algorithm-driven online platform film and television works on values. Chinese Editors Journal, (12), 64-69.
  • [7] Wang, Z., & Leng, X. (2026). Conscious “obsession”: Behavioral motivations and emotional structure of young people watching micro-short dramas. China Youth Study, (2), 93-101, 120.
  • [8] Ye, J. (2025). “People who binge dramas”: Symptoms, causes, and countermeasures of the hot phenomenon of youth micro-short dramas. Ideological and Theoretical Education, (4), 88-93.
  • [9] Zhang, N., & Xu, X. (2026). Why is it hard to stop watching dramas? A logical inquiry into contemporary youth addiction to “McDonaldized” micro-short dramas. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (3), 203-213.
  • [10] Huang, M. (2024). The “pleasure” and “displeasure” of micro-short dramas: The paradoxical mechanism and racing trap under the theory of primary pleasure. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, (9), 135-147.
  • [11] Chen, H. (2026). Carnival of the five senses and assuming falseness: “Atmosphere production” and the acceptance contract of AI micro-short dramas. Ningxia Social Sciences, (1), 193-201.
  • [12] Xu, C. (2026). From cultural inheritance to science-fiction futures: New trends and implications in the development of domestic AI micro-short dramas. Movie Review, (2), 17-22.
  • [13] Li, S., & Xie, X. (2026). Research on the creative paradigm and industrial governance of AI comic dramas driven by artificial intelligence. China Market, (24), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.13939/j.cnki.zgsc.2026.24.017.
  • [14] Shen, X., & Cao, D. (2025). Toward reality: Ethical risks and governance strategies of AI micro-short dramas under the pseudo-environment. New Media and Society, (6), 376-390, 491-492.
  • [15] Li, X., & Liu, Z. (2026). Technological empowerment and risk governance: The copyright dilemma and solutions of AIGC intervention in micro-short drama creation. New Media and Society, (1), 463-478, 515-516.
  • [16] Guo, Z., Li, M., & Meng, X. (2024). Challenges of AI emergent generation to audiovisual creation: Reflections on the future audiovisual industry. China Television, (12), 31-37.
  • [17] Zhao, W. (2025). Judicial challenges and rule reconstruction of AI face swapping: Research on the boundary of reasonable use of portrait rights in micro-short dramas. New Media and Society, 1-13. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/CN.20251121.1236.002