From “Classics” to “Radical Remix”: Aesthetic Reconstruction in AI-Generated Remix Videos
Main Article Content
Keywords
AI remix videos, radical adaptation, aesthetic reconstruction
Abstract
In recent years, the rapid growth of AIGC has brought a wave of AI-assisted remix videos to major online platforms. What began with relatively simple face-swapping and voice synthesis has gradually developed into dramatic rewritings of well-known film, television, and literary IP through generative AI. Once a marginal form of online parody, this type of content has become a visible part of contemporary digital culture. Its development can be understood as a shift from technological novelty to cultural deconstruction and, increasingly, to aesthetic reconstruction. In this article, aesthetic reconstruction is described as the method by which users use AI to depart from the original work's fixed narrative structure, character backgrounds and values, and reconstruct it into a novel form. Previous research has indicated that AI remixing modifies canonical texts by means of visual combination, change of narrative and reversal of character identities. However, most discussions focus on copyright and ethics, or are limited to specific instances, not deeply investigating the internal mechanism of aesthetic reconstruction. By taking AI remixes of well-known intellectual properties such as Empresses in the Palace and Dream of the Red Chamber as examples, this study applies Bakhtin's theory of carnival and Baudrillard's theory of simulacrum to explore how aesthetic reconstruction occurs when classic works are significantly changed by radical AI adaptation.
References
- [1]Zhang, J., & Wei, X. (2025). Returning from radical AI alteration to the source: A typological reflection on “AI-modified” videos. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology (Social Science), 27(4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1101.2025.04.010
- [2]Fan, S. B. (2025). The impact of AI on literary concepts: Breaking aesthetic boundaries, hybrid thinking, and value reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Academic Symposium on Literature and AI Writing. Hubei Minzu University.
- [3]You, D. (2026). Empowerment and value formation: AI “radical remix” short videos from the perspective of technology-culture co-construction. Contemporary Television, (5), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.16531/j.cnki.1000-8977.2026.05.012
- [4]Zhu, B. J. (2022). Visual aesthetics, auditory aesthetics, and tactile aesthetics: Three representations of postmodern aesthetic reconstruction. Zhejiang Academic Journal, (2), 222–230.
- [5]Fu, S. X. (2007). The secularization of aesthetic paradigms: Reconstructing the philosophy of art and changing aesthetic tastes. Exploration, (2), 128–131.
- [6]Liu, D. Q. (2025). Copyright risks and governance paths for AI-based “radical adaptations” of classic film and television works. Publishing Research, (11), 71–80.
- [7]Zhou, S. (2025, February 6). Secondary-creation short videos face an AI “invasion.” China Culture Daily, p. 6.
- [8]Wang, Z. F. (2026, April 29). In the AI era, how should secondary-creation “scissors hands” be governed? Nanfang Daily, p. A06.
- [9]Yu, G. M., & Teng, W. Q. (2023). Ecological empowerment and value iteration of short video by generative AI. Academic Exploration, (7), 43–48.
- [10]Huang, S. W. (2024). Generative AI embedded in short video: Production transformation, textual reconstruction, and aesthetic shift. Television Research, (4), 78–81.
- [11]Yan, Y., & Xu, J. D. (2021). Poaching, carnival, and interaction: A study of the communication psychology of Kichiku videos. Contemporary Television, (6), 81–85.
- [12]Meng, J. (2025). Understanding AI radical remix: Symbolic carnival and technological enthusiasm in the age of human–AI co-creation. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 42(4), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.15897/j.cnki.cn51-1046/g2.20250904.001
- [13]Wu, Y. Y. (2023). Communication characteristics of film and television secondary-creation short videos from the perspective of participatory culture [Master’s thesis, Yantai University].
- [14]Zhang, Y. N., & Xu, F. (2025). The influence of short-video secondary creation on film IP communication in the age of fragmentation. Culture Journal, (7), 48–51.
- [15]Zhong, Q. (2025). A critical study of imitation of Empresses in the Palace on Douyin [Master’s thesis, Nanchang University].
- [16]Qin, Q., & Luo, M. Z. (2025). The transformation of film aesthetics in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Beijing Film Academy, (12), 34–42.
- [17]Huang, Z. Y. (2025). From “index of reality” to “aesthetic contract”: Challenges to image ontology and new paradigms of criticism in the AI era. Film Theory Research, 7(2), 45–53.
- [18]Liu, Z. Y. (2024). Film and television production amid the AIGC wave: Model innovation and risk review. Western Journal, (16), 36–39.
- [19]Chen, C. F., & Zhang, M. (2023). Determined by data? Values and ethical issues in AIGC. News and Writing, (4), 15–23.
- [20]Zhang, Y. B. (2026). Copyright issues and governance approaches for AI “radical remix” videos. Journal of Xichang University (Social Science Edition), 38(1), 78–84.
- [21]Chang, J., & Wang, H. K. (2024). When artificial intelligence gains imagination: From posthuman media to a new Renaissance. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 46(10), 79–87.
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.