Technology-neutral Illusion: The Ethical and Social Challenges in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Authors

  • Qifan Gao London School of Economics and Political Science, London Author
  • Hongyu An Shenyang Jianzhu University, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70267/frygj645

Keywords:

Technological Neutrality,Technological Justice,Algorithms, Social Justice,Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The doctrine of technological neutrality posits that technology itself lacks moral value and it is only the use by humans that bestows value upon it. However, this perspective overlooks the social context of technology itself, as well as the political, economic, and cultural factors involved in its research, development, and application. In fact, technology not only reflects the value orientations of designers and users but also embodies the social structure and human behavior of a certain stage. Especially in the era of artificial intelligence, technology possesses the capability to operate autonomously, and the autonomous operation of technological products can present the value defects at the design stage in a scaled manner, leading to systemic biases and injustices. This paper analyzes the purpose of technological design and the power manipulation reflected in technological code, demonstrating that technology is not neutral and does not imply justice. Technology needs to be supervised and regulated by ethics, law, society, and other aspects to safeguard human interests and dignity.

References

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Eubanks, V. (2021). Automatic Inequality. (M. Li, Trans.). Beijing, China: The Commercial Press.

Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 14(3), 330-347.

Guan, Z. (2017). Audience commodity theory interpretation news client. News Research Guide, (7).

Habermas, J. (1999). Technology and Science as an “Ideology”. (Li Li, Trans.). Shanghai, China: Xuelin Press.

Hu, Y. (2023). The Global Open Internet Goes Astray. Shanxi, China: Shanxi People’s Publishing House.

Hu, Y. (2023). The Global Open Internet Goes Astray. Shanxi, China: Shanxi People’s Publishing House.

Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14-29.

Lao, D. (2021, August 10). Technology neutrality is a pseudo-proposition. Retrieved from https://www.inforsec.org/wp/?p=4889

Liu, X. (2022). Technology neutrality in the era of digital globalization: Phantom and reality. Exploration and Contention, 398(12).

Mesthene, E. G. (1970). Technology Change: Its Impact on Man and Society. New York, NY: New American Library Press.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York, NY: NYU Press.

O’Neal, C. (2020). The Pride and Prejudice of Big Data. (R. Xu & S. Song, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Capital Press.

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

Palmer, A. W. (2022, December 27). TikTok success and destiny: The product of the times between China and the United States. Retrieved from https://cn.nytimes.com/technology/20221227/tiktok-us-china-diplomacy/

Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Pukainen, E., & Verinen, K. (2021). Interests and challenges of technology-neutral regulation: A scoping review. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Information Systems Conference, 1-10.

Sless, D. (2014). What is it after the bike? The political and ideological attributes of technology. The Open Era, (04).

Wu, G. (2009). Philosophy of Technology Lecture Record. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press.

Wu, T. (2003). Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. Journal on Telecommunication and High Technology Law, 2.

Xu, L. (2004). Philosophy of Technology. Shanghai, China: Fudan University Press.

Yang, F. (2006). New thinking on the technical neutrality theory. Journal of Liaoning Institute of Education Administration, 23(11).

Ye, X. (2012). Is the technology neutral? Again on the impact of technology on education. Modern Distance Education, 141(3).

Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Zhang, A. (2019). Algorithmic power in the era of artificial intelligence: Logic, risk, and regulation. Journal of Hohai University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, (6).

Zhao, Y., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., Smith, B., & Tan, H. (2004). Technology non-neutrality: Theoretical analysis and empirical research of computer intermediary communication technology. Educational Computer Research, 30(1-2), 23-55.

Zou, J. (2015). New trends and enlightenment of the “net neutrality” debate. Journalism and Communication Research, (06).

Zou, J. (2015). New trends and enlightenment of the “net neutrality” debate. Journalism and Communication Research, (06).

Downloads

Published

2024-07-09

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Gao , Q., & An , H. (2024). Technology-neutral Illusion: The Ethical and Social Challenges in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Sociology, Philosophy and Psychology, 1(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.70267/frygj645