CBAM and China Carbon Market: Policy Synergy, Trade Impacts and Research Outlook Review

Main Article Content

Jiahui Lin

Keywords

carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), China carbon market, policy coordination, international trade

Abstract

One of the most important tools for changing international trade and climate regulations is the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). The institutional ramifications of CBAM, its global positioning, and its overall influence on China’s carbon market are all thoroughly reviewed in this paper. According to the study, CBAM drives domestic industries toward green and low-carbon transformation while simultaneously raising export costs and tightening carbon management regulations, which have a structural impact on China’s high-carbon goods like steel, aluminum, and chemicals’ ability to compete internationally. In contrast to the carbon market in the EU, China’s carbon market is still in its infancy and has structural flaws. With carbon pricing coordination, industry standard alignment, and green financial support serving as important avenues for addressing external pressures, CBAM also offers external stimulus for institutional improvement in China’s carbon market. Research on topics like corporate microbehaviors, the effects of regional differences, the use of transition finance tools, and tactics for international rule competition is still lacking. In order to foster institutional innovation in carbon markets and cooperation with international regulations, future initiatives should concentrate on interdisciplinary research.

Abstract 19 | PDF Downloads 11

References

  • [1] Yang, L., Lu, Z., & Shen, M. (2025). Research on the effect and path of CBAM on green technology innovation in China’s high-carbon manufacturing industries. Sustainability, 17(5), 2305.
  • [2] Shen, K. (2010). Carbon tariff dispute and its impact on China’s manufacturing industry. China Industrial Economics, (1), 1–10.
  • [3] Liu, B., & Zhao, F. (2021). The impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s exports and countermeasures. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 36(6), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.13613/j.cnki.qhdz.003114
  • [4] Zeng, A., Tan, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China under the background of carbon neutrality and countermeasure analysis. China Environmental Management, 14(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2022.01.031
  • [5] Wang, F., Yin, X., Yang, X., et al. (2024). Impact of new developments in the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s foreign investment and foreign trade and corresponding countermeasures. International Trade, (7), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.14114/j.cnki.itrade.2024.07.005
  • [6] Li, X., Cao, J., Wang, K., et al. (2025). Impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s export trade and countermeasures. International Taxation, (5), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.19376/j.cnki.cn10-1142/f.2025.05.009
  • [7] Sun, Q., Ma, L., & Fan, M., et al. (2025). Lessons from the development and operational experiences of international carbon markets for the construction of China’s carbon market. Global Energy Interconnection, (2).
  • [8] Duan, Y., Cai, L., & Chen, Y. (2023). Emission reduction and welfare effects of China’s carbon market under globalization. Economic Research Journal, 58(7), 121–138.
  • [9] Zhang, B., Yu, L., & Cai, H. (2025). Assessment of the “buffer valve” effect of carbon tariff impact and China’s carbon market expansion and price increase. China Industrial Economics, (9), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2025.09.001
  • [10] Zheng, H., & Boqiang, L. (2023). Evaluating current effects of upcoming EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: Evidence from China’s futures market. Energy Policy, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113573
  • [11] Sun, Y., He, J., & Wu, S., et al. (2025). Study on the comprehensive impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China: Through the channel of high-carbon industry exports. Coal Economic Research, 45(2), 18–28.
  • [12] Xu, X., Wang, Y., & Yu, L., et al. (2025). Impact assessment of reactive carbon tariff and proactive carbon tax on China’s energy and power industries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107965
  • [13] Beaufils, T., Ward, H., Jakob, M., et al. (2023). Assessing different European carbon border adjustment mechanism implementations and their impact on trade partners. Communications Earth & Environment, 4, 131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00788-4
  • [14] Wang, S., Gong, C., & He, K., et al. (2025). The potential impacts of carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on China’s high-carbon industries. Energy, 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137315