Green Agricultural Development and Urban Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence from China

Main Article Content

Sixuan Xin

Keywords

green agriculture, urban carbon emissions, multi-period difference-in-differences method

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global climate warming and China’s “dual carbon” goals, exploring the impact of green agricultural development on urban carbon emissions is of great significance for synergistically promoting agricultural green transformation and climate governance. Taking the establishment of National Agricultural Green Development Pilot Zones as a quasi-natural experiment, this study employs panel data from 288 cities in China from 2015 to 2023 and applies the multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the impact of green agricultural development on urban carbon emissions. The results show that green agricultural development significantly reduces urban carbon emissions, and this finding remains robust after a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. Mechanism tests indicate that green agricultural development achieves carbon emission reduction by reducing agricultural fertilizer application, promoting the development of digital inclusive finance, and enhancing rural innovation and entrepreneurship. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effect is influenced by geographical location, topographic conditions, economic development level, and agricultural production functional zones. This paper provides important policy implications for green agricultural development policies, agricultural transformation, and urban carbon emission reduction in developing countries.

Abstract 22 | PDF Downloads 13

References

  • [1]Lee, C. C., & Zhao, Y. N. (2023). Heterogeneity analysis of factors influencing CO2 emissions: The role of human capital, urbanization, and FDI. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 185.
  • [2]Thio, E., Tan, M. X., Li, L., Salman, M., Long, X. L., Sun, H. P., & Zhu, B. Z. (2021). The estimation of influencing factors for carbon emissions based on EKC hypothesis and STIRPAT model: Evidence from top 10 countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(9), 1-34.
  • [3]Quan, C. G., Cheng, X. J., Yu, S. S., & Ye, X. (2020). Analysis on the influencing factors of carbon emission in China's logistics industry based on LMDI method. Science of the Total Environment, 734, Article 138473.
  • [4]Jiang, M. H., An, H. Z., Gao, X. Y., Liu, S. Y., & Xi, X. (2019). Factors driving global carbon emissions: A complex network perspective. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 146, 431-440.
  • [5]Liu, X. Y., Song, M., Wang, S. Y., Xu, X. W., & Li, H. L. (2024). On innovation infrastructure and industrial carbon emissions: Nonlinear correlation and effect mechanism. Applied Energy, 375, Article 124079.
  • [6]Fan, W., Luo, X., Yu, J. B., & Dai, Y. Y. (2021). An empirical study of carbon emission impact factors based on the vector autoregression model. Energies, 14(22), Article 7797.
  • [7]Sun, B. W., & Zheng, S. L. (2024). The synergistic effect of environmental regulation on pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of clean production standards. China Economic Quarterly, 24(02), 624-642.
  • [8]Ouyang, W., Zhou, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Can command-and-control regulation reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 112, Article 107802.
  • [9]Yao, Y. T., & Chen, W. M. (2010). Current status of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and research on low-carbon agricultural development models. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 27(22), 48-51.
  • [10]Qu, F. T., Lu, N., & Feng, S. Y. (2011). The impact of land use change on carbon emissions. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21(10), 76-83.
  • [11]Luo, Y., Xiong, T., Meng, D., Gao, A., & Chen, Y. (2023). Does the integrated development of agriculture and tourism promote farmers’ income growth? Evidence from Southwestern China. Agriculture, 13(9), Article 1745.
  • [12]Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Peng, J., Lv, Y., Wang, W., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Effects of rural collective economy policy on the common prosperity in China: Based on the mediating effect of farmland transfer. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, Article 1302545.
  • [13]Li, Z., Shi, Q., Hu, K., & Chen, Z. (2026). The impact of agricultural green development on common prosperity for farmers in rural areas. Scientific Reports, 16(1), Article 5844.
  • [14]Yu, F. (2016). Xi Jinping’s new thought on green development and the green transformation development of agriculture. China Rural Survey, (05), 2-9+94.
  • [15]Sun, W., Wang, R., Jiang, Q., & Huang, S. (2019). Research on the connotation and evaluation of agricultural green development. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 40(04), 14-21.
  • [16]Yin, C. (2016). Thoughts on accelerating the promotion of agricultural green and sustainable development. Rural Work Newsletter, (05), 7-9.
  • [17]School of Economics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250358, China, School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, 401331, China, & School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, 401331, China. (2020). China’s agricultural green total factor productivity based on carbon emission: An analysis of evolution trend and influencing factors. Journal of Cleaner Production.
  • [18]Yurak, V. V., & Fedorov, S. A. (2024). Review of natural and anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide into the earth’s atmosphere. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(4), 2719-2736.
  • [19]Yoro, K. O., & Daramola, M. O. (2020). CO2 emission sources, greenhouse gases, and the global warming effect. In Advances in carbon capture (pp. 3-28). Woodhead Publishing.
  • [20]Shi, S., & Yin, J. (2021). Global research on carbon footprint: A scientometric review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, Article 106580.
  • [21]Zhang, Z., Yang, Z., & Zhou, J. (2025). Evaluation of fertilizer reduction effect in National Agricultural Green Development Pilot Zones: Also on the relationship between fertilizer reduction and food security. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 46(12), 103-116.
  • [22]Zhang, S., Yin, C., He, Y., & Xiao, X. (2020). Spatial differentiation and dynamic evolution of agricultural carbon emissions in China: An empirical study based on spatial and nonparametric estimation methods. China Environmental Science, 40(03), 1356-1363.
  • [23]Liu, H., Liu, S., & Shang, J. (2026). Research on the impact of the National Agricultural Green Development Pilot Zones policy on agricultural carbon emissions. China Environmental Science, 46(01), 555-567.
  • [24]Li, S., & Zhang, J. (2023). Digital inclusive finance, technological innovation, and urban carbon emission intensity. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 55(02), 161-172+178.
  • [25]Ji, X., & Feng, W. (2026). Digital inclusive finance, new quality productive forces, and regional carbon intensity. Review of Economy and Management, 42(02), 57-69.
  • [26]Xu, W., Zhou, J., & Liu, C. (2022). Spatial effects of digital economy development on urban carbon emissions. Geographical Research, 41(01), 111-129.
  • [27]Tian, R., Cao, G., Xiang, S., Gao, X., & Su, L. (2023). Research on the impact and spatial effects of regional innovation and entrepreneurship capacity on carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 32(07), 1365-1378.
  • [28]Ruan, J., Yang, Q., Ye, W., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Development of rural innovation and entrepreneurship in China: Index construction and measurement analysis. Economy and Management, 38(05), 9-18.
  • [29]Wu, G., Chen, G., & Cheng, J. (2025). The impact of agricultural environmental regulation on urban-rural integrated development: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of National Agricultural Green Development Pilot Zones. China Population, Resources and Environment, 35(02), 171-184.
  • [30]Li, F., Duan, J., & Cheng, B. (2025). The impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Reform, (10), 145-158.
  • [31]He, Y., Xie, Z., Xie, H., & Cheng, H. (2025). Geographical differentiation and spatial spillover of the impact of export trade on urban carbon emissions. Resources Science, 47(11), 2523-2536.
  • [32]Zhang, L., Nie, R., & Zhang, Y. (2025). The impact of the digital economy on carbon emissions and its spatial spillover effect. Statistics and Decision, 41(12), 113-117.
  • [33]Guo, F., Wang, J., Wang, F., Kong, T., Zhang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Measuring the development of digital inclusive finance in China: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly, 19(04), 1401-1418.
  • [34]Jiang, T. (2022). Mediation and moderation effects in empirical studies of causal inference. China Industrial Economics, (05), 100-120.
  • [35]Tang, H., Fang, S., & Jiang, D. (2022). Market performance of digital transformation: Can digital M&A enhance the market power of manufacturing enterprises? Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, 39(12), 90-110.
  • [36]Sun, L., & Abraham, S. (2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175-199. (Note: Original publication year adjusted to 2021 based on standard citation; some sources list as 2020 online-first.)
  • [37]Ding, B., Zhao, Y., & Deng, J. (2022). Measurement, decoupling characteristics, and driving factors of carbon emissions from crop farming in China. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 43(05), 1-11.
  • [38]Hu, C., Wei, Y., & Hu, W. (2018). Research on the relationship between agricultural policy, technological innovation, and agricultural carbon emissions. Issues in Agricultural Economy, (09), 66-75.