Can Digital Literacy Promote Pesticide Reduction Among Farmers? An Analysis of Heterogeneity
Main Article Content
Keywords
digital literacy, pesticide usage, agricultural economics
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the deepening green transformation of agriculture and the development of digital rural communities, exploring the impact of digital literacy on the reduction of agricultural inputs holds significant practical importance. Based on data from county statistical yearbooks and government statistical bulletins, this study employs the Digital Inclusive Finance Index to measure digital literacy levels and empirically examines its impact on pesticide use. The findings reveal that improved digital literacy significantly curbs pesticide use, indicating that the accumulation of digital capabilities helps drive farmers’ transition from experience-based inputs to precision-based inputs. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that this inhibitory effect is more pronounced in eastern and central regions, as well as in key environmental protection cities and old industrial bases. This study argues that efforts to enhance farmers’ digital literacy should be integrated with the development of a green agricultural governance system to better leverage the role of digital empowerment in reducing pesticide and fertilizer use while improving efficiency.
References
- [1] Davis, V. F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
- [2] Schultz, T. W., & Snedecor, G. W. (1933). Analysis of variance as an effective method of handling the time element in certain economic statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28(181), 14-30.
- [3] Liu YJ, Zhang X, Cai YL. (2026). Constructing Internet Infrastructure, Narrowing Digital Divide, and Improving Welfare A Study Based on Quantitative Spatial General Equilibrium [J]. China Industrial Economics, (01):53-75.DOI:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2026.01.003.
- [4] Tian LC, Zhang WW. (2024). How does digital infrastructure affect rural household entrepreneurship? [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment 34(08):166-178.
- [5] Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard business review, 57(2), 78-93. Yu YH, Huo ZX. How does digital literacy promote rural residents' consumption? [J]. China Soft Science,2026,(01):85-96.
- [6] Su LL, Zhang PY, Peng YL. (2021) A Study on the Mechanisms by Which Farmers' Digital Literacy Drives the Development of Digital Rural Communities [J]. E-Government, (10):42-56.DOI:10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2021.10.004.
- [7] Lu QW, Lv ZW, Li J. (2019). Why Do Chinese Farmers Prefer to Purchase Agricultural Machinery Operation Services: Based on the Evolution of Use-pattern in China and Japan [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, (01):113-124.DOI:10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2019.01.010.
- [8] Du JJ, Zhu X, Zhang JW. (2026). Digital Economy Empowerment and Agricultural Intelligence: Theoretical Mechanism, Innovation Model and Policy System [J]. Economic Geography, 46(01):193-203.DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2026.01.019.
- [9] Zhao DD, Bao BF. (2026). A Study of the Impact of Agricultural Socialized Services on the Inclusive Green Growth in Rural Areas [J/OL]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,1-12.https://doi.org/10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1224/f.20260128.001.
- [10] Ni JX, Zhan JT. (2025). Theoretical Logic, Practical Dilemmas, and Path Optimization of Crop Straw Utilization Governance: A Case Study of Rugao City, Jiangsu Province [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2025,(06):33-48.DOI:10.13246/j.cnki.iae. 06.002.
- [11] Liu LN, Liu M.(2025). Driving Rural Development Towards Neo-Endogenous Development Model Through Digital Technology——Analysis Based on Dynamic Capability Shaping and Digital Capital Cultivation [J]. Administrative Tribune, 32(01):141-150. DOI:10.16637/j.cnki.23-1360/d.2025.01.013.
- [12] Guo F, Wang JY, Wang F et al., (2020) Measuring China's Digital Financial Inclusion: Index Compilation and Spatial Characteristics [J]. China Economic Quarterly, 19(04):1401-1418. DOI:10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2020.03.12.
