Digital Empowerment and Spatial Equilibrium: An Empirical Examination of the Impact of the Digital Economy on Regional Economic Patterns from the Perspective of Common Prosperity
Main Article Content
Keywords
digital economy, regional economic spatial distribution agglomeration, common prosperity, Spatial Durbin Model, moderating effect
Abstract
Common prosperity is an important goal of China’s high-quality development. Optimizing the spatial layout of the regional economy and guiding rational economic agglomeration are key to advancing coordinated regional development. The digital economy is profoundly reshaping regional economic patterns, but its mechanisms of influence on prefecture-level economic spatial agglomeration still require clarification. Based on panel data from 266 prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2023, this paper constructs a comprehensive digital economy index and employs two-way fixed effects and the Spatial Durbin Model to examine the impact of the digital economy on regional economic agglomeration and its spatial spillover effects. The results show that the digital economy significantly strengthens local economic agglomeration, with even stronger spatial spillover effects, exhibiting a regional siphoning phenomenon. This impact varies significantly across different locations, city types, and development levels. All three types of moderating factors positively enhance local agglomeration levels but inhibit positive spatial spillovers and exacerbate regional imbalances. This study provides empirical evidence for formulating location-specific digital development policies and promoting coordinated regional development.
References
- [1]Pan, K., & Zhang, X. X. (2024). Analysis of the mechanism of digital economy empowering common prosperity. Jianghan Tribune, (6), 27-32.
- [2]Zhang, M. Y., Wang, J. R., & Guo, J. (2024). Research on the impact effect of digital economy on the balance of regional financial resources in China. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, (12), 47-56.
- [3]Huang, Q. H., Yu, Y. Z., & Zhang, S. L. (2019). Internet development and the manufacturing productivity improvement: Internal mechanism and China’s experience. China Industrial Economics, (8), 5-23.
- [4]Chao, X. J., Shen, L., & Xue, Z. X. (2023). Re-measurement of the digital economy development level of Chinese provinces based on morphological attributes. Economic Problems, (2), 23-34.
- [5]Zhang, L., & Jiang, N. (2024). Research on the impact of data factor mobility on urban innovation activity. Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University (Social Sciences Edition), 20(02), 1-16.
- [6]Yang, Y. (2025). The inverted “U”-shaped impact of trade circulation and manufacturing agglomeration on regional economy and the spatial spillover effect. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, (24), 28-31.
- [7]Yuan, M. L., Wang, Z. H., & Yao, D. M. (2025). Economic agglomeration and local fiscal capacity: An empirical test based on tax transfer effect and tax collection effect. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 47(12), 39-51.
- [8]Zhao, J. M., & Zhu, Y. X. (2023). Marketization process and regional economic imbalance: An analysis based on nighttime light data. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, (4), 105-117.
- [9]Yao, C. C., & Song, D. L. (2023). Digital economy and reconstruction of industrial spatial layout: Equilibrium or polarization. Finance & Trade Economics, 44(06), 116-130.
- [10]Zuo, W. S., Gu, H. Y., Zhou, L., et al. (2024). Evolution of spatial pattern of digital economy innovation and its driving mechanism in Chinese cities. Economic Geography, 44(06), 1-10.
- [11]Xu, Z. Y., Zhou, Z. X., Kong, X. B., et al. (2024). Evaluation index system and measurement of common prosperity in China: Discussion based on provincial and regional levels. Statistical Research, 41(3), 3-17.
- [12]Zhang, L. X., Wang, M. D., & Guan, Q. M. (2025). Is there a threshold for the empowerment of rural revitalization by the digital economy? Based on the perspectives of human capital and industrial scale. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Social Sciences Edition), 27(3), 24-36.
- [13]Ding, C. M., Chen, Z. Y., Li, Y. Y., et al. (2024). Digital economy and balanced economic development between North and South China under the background of shifting drivers of growth. Finance & Trade Economics, 45(10), 52-67.
- [14]Krugman, P. (1997). Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. MIT Press.
- [15]Liu, Y. B., Hu, W. H., Luo, K., et al. (2023). Impact of digital economy development in provincial capital cities: Spillover or siphon. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 40(15), 53-63.
- [16]Yang, W. P., Yao, Q. Y., & Li, D. (2025). Spatial threshold effect and geographical decay boundary of digital economy empowering high-quality development: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta. East China Economic Management, 39(11), 79-90.
- [17]Zhong, J., & Feng, Z. (2024). Institutional innovation and agglomeration of digital technology innovation enterprises: Evidence from China's Free Trade Zones. World Economy Study, (09), 3-26.
- [18]Yang, W. P., Yao, Q. Y., & Li, D. (2025). Spatial threshold effect and geographical decay boundary of digital economy empowering high-quality development: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta. East China Economic Management, 39(11), 79-90.
- [19]Bai, X. (2023). Research on the common prosperity effect of the digital economy: Based on the perspective of urban-rural income distribution gap. Economic Review, (12), 84-94.
- [20]Wang, X. L., Fan, G., & Li, A. L. (2025). Marketization Index of China’s Provinces: NERI Report 2024. China Economic Publishing House.
- [21]Cai, F., & Du, Y. (2000). Convergence and difference in regional economic growth in China: Implications for the Western Development Strategy. Economic Research Journal, (10), 30-37, 80.
- [22]Lian, Y. J., Wang, W. D., & Ye, R. C. (2014). Monte Carlo simulation analysis of the effectiveness of Hausman test statistics. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 33(05), 831-841.
