A Review of the Impact of Capability Illusions Induced by Generative Artificial Intelligence on Individual Investors' Overconfidence: From the Perspective of Heterogeneity in Investment Decision Efficiency and Risk Preferences

Main Article Content

Hankun Zhu

Keywords

illusion of competence, overconfidence, investment decision efficiency, heterogeneity of risk preferences, behavioural finance

Abstract

With the rapid commercialisation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the field of financial investment, the illusion and overconfidence of individual investors' skills have become an important factor affecting the efficiency of investment decision-making. This review brings together the research published by Web of Science, Google Scholar and CNKI from 2020 to 2026. It is found that GenAI greatly increases the skill fantasy of retail investors, which makes their overconfidence stronger. The efficiency of investment decision-making is a bit like a bridge in this relationship, and the difference of risk preference is an important variable, which changes the intensity of this effect among different investor groups. This paper summarises the researchers' thoughts today, shows the differences and unknown contents, and puts forward ideas for future research. The purpose of this review is to provide theoretical reference for the interdisciplinary study of GenAI and investor behaviour. It also provides some practical suggestions, which could help individual investors avoid misjudgement and help financial institutions improve their services based on artificial intelligence.

Abstract 15 | PDF Downloads 9

References

  • [1]Paglieri, F. (2024). Expropriated minds: On some practical problems of generative AI, beyond our cognitive illusions. Philosophy & Technology, 37(2), 55.
  • [2]Guo, Q., Zhang, L., & Wei, W. (2025). The generation mechanism of AI hallucinations and agile governance. News and Writing, 2025(12).
  • [3]Wasi, A. T., & Eram, E. H. (2024). Illusion of control: Exploring the limits of human-in-the-loop oversight in generative finance [Preprint].
  • [4]Huang, X. (2024). Research on investment behavior characteristics and strategies based on behavioral finance theory. Capital Market, (5), 31-33.
  • [5]Croom, J. (2026). Interactivity and illusions of ability: How using generative AI affects investor judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 64(2).
  • [6]Abdin, S. Z. U., Qureshi, F., Iqbal, J., & Sultana, S. (2022). Overconfidence bias and investment performance: A mediating effect of risk propensity. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(4), 780-793.
  • [7]Cheng, K., Yu, N., Zhang, X., & Yang, X. (2026). Investor behavior and asset pricing in the digital economy. China Journal of Econometrics. Advance online publication.
  • [8]Gill, S., Khurshid, M. K., Mahmood, S., & Ali, A. (2018). Factors effecting investment decision making behavior: The mediating role of information searches. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 7(4), 758-767.
  • [9]Rao, Y., & Zhu, R. (2014). Does cognitive difference affect middle-aged and elderly investors’ holdings of risky assets? Management World, (11), 170-172.
  • [10]Zhang, M., Yang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025). How can artificial intelligence applications empower corporate investment efficiency—from the perspectives of resource allocation efficiency and investment decision-making quality. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences), 40(5), 87-100.
  • [11]Kasoga, P. S. (2021). Heuristic biases and investment decisions: Multiple mediation mechanisms of risk tolerance and financial literacy—a survey at the Tanzania stock market. Journal of Money and Business, 1(2), 102-115.
  • [12]Nah, F. F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277-304.
  • [13]Santos-Pinto, L., & De La Rosa, L. E. (2020). Overconfidence in labor markets. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, 1-39.