Research on the Disruptive Innovation of NEV to the Traditional Automotive Industry from the Perspective of Business Models
Main Article Content
Keywords
business model, disruptive innovation, new energy vehicle, asymmetric motivation
Abstract
Since its formal proposal, disruptive innovation theory has undergone more than two decades of improvement and evolution, exerting a profound influence on academic fields such as business and enterprise management. As the market share of New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) has gradually increased in recent years, people have noticed that traditional fuel vehicle enterprises seem to be struggling to cope with the pressure from new car-making forces. To analyze the mechanism of the dual drive of “technology + business model” and break through the transformation predicament of traditional automakers, this paper, relying on the disruptive innovation theory refined and expounded by Christensen in 2015, adopts methods such as systematic literature retrieval, case analysis, and comparative study, and selects typical international automakers such as Tesla, BYD, and Volkswagen as cases. Through conducting specific case studies on traditional energy and NEV enterprises worldwide, the author has distilled the intrinsic mechanisms of disruptive innovation and the development of the automotive industry, and then put forward breakthrough viewpoints. Research shows that the emergence of NEV represents a disruptive innovation for traditional automakers not only in terms of products but also in the entire business system. This makes it difficult for the decades of business models and management experience of traditional automakers to match the development logic of the new energy vehicle industry, and their long-accumulated business model advantages and management experience have been gradually weakened.
References
- [1]Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
- [2]Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard business review, 73(1), 43-53.
- [3]Hardman, S., Shiu, E., & Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2015). Changing the fate of Fuel Cell Vehicles: Can lessons be learnt from Tesla Motors? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(4), 1625–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.149
- [4]Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2008). When is a disruptive innovation disruptive?. Journal of product innovation management, 25(4), 347-369.
- [5]King, A. A., & Baatartogtokh, B. (2015, September 15). How useful is the theory of disruptive innovation? MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(1), 10–11. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-useful-is-the-theory-of-disruptive-innovation/
- [6]Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). 17. Disruptive innovation. Harvard business review, 93(12), 44-53.
- [7]International Energy Agency. (2026). Global EV Outlook 2026. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2026
- [8]Adner, R. (1999). A demand-based view of technology competition: Demand structure and technology displacement (Report No. ISIC-1999-01). Information Storage Industry Center, University of California, San Diego. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18x3r4fm
- [9]Hepp, D., Kellner, M., Jautelat, S., Guggenheimer, M., & Aloise, T. (2026, January 6). The automotive software and electronics market through 2035. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/features/mckinsey-center-for-future-mobility/our-insights/mapping-the-automotive-software-and-electronics-landscape
- [10]Deloitte. (2026). 2026 Global Automotive Consumer Study. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/retail-distribution/global-automotive-consumer-study.html
- [11]Koster, A., Arora, A., & Quinn, M. (2021, February 18). Chasing the software-defined dream car. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/software-transformation-in-the-automotive-industry
- [12]March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
- [13]Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-29.
- [14]Brem, A., & Nylund, P. (2023). Incumbents inertia in the automotive industry: Technological, market, and societal drivers of electric vehicle standardization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3336004
- [15]Hepp, D., Kellner, M., Jautelat, S., Guggenheimer, M., & Aloise, T. (2026, January 6). The automotive software and electronics market through 2035. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/features/mckinsey-center-for-future-mobility/our-insights/mapping-the-automotive-software-and-electronics-landscape
- [16]Deloitte. (2026). 2026 Global Automotive Consumer Study. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/retail-distribution/global-automotive-consumer-study.html
- [17]Wendt, T. F., Winterhoff, M., Boyle, B. R., & Wilson, R. (2014, January). Rethink: Automotive retail networks (think:act STUDY). Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/Explaining-software-defined-vehicles.html
- [18]Roland Berger. (2014, January). Rethink: Automotive retail networks. https://www.rolandberger.com
- [19]Inampudi, S., Kramer, N., Maurer, I., & Simmons, V. (2019, January 23). As dramatic disruption comes to automotive showrooms, proactive dealers can benefit greatly. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/as-dramatic-disruption-comes-to-automotive-showrooms-proactive-dealers-can-benefit-greatly
- [20]Chandran, J. (2023, July 3). Digital disruption hits new electric vehicle retailing as customers flock to convenience of online platforms. Frost & Sullivan. https://www.frost.com/growth-opportunity-news/digital-disruption-hits-new-electric-vehicle-retailing-as-customers-flock-to-convenience-of-online-platforms/
- [21]Auto dealers confront legal battles over direct-to-consumer EV sales model. (2024, March 15). Daily Journal. https://www.dailyjournal.com/article/390635-auto-dealers-confront-legal-battles-over-direct-to-consumer-ev-sales-model
- [22]Cataldo, L. (2025, January 2). Why dealers are opposed to direct-to-consumer sales. CarBuzz. https://carbuzz.com/dealers-opposed-direct-to-consumer-sales/
- [23]Koster, A., Arora, A., & Quinn, M. (2021, February 18). Chasing the software-defined dream car. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/software-transformation-in-the-automotive-industry
- [24]Eisele, P. (2025, February 20). P3: SW defined vehicles (Edition #1/2025). P3 automotive GmbH. https://www.p3-group.com
- [25]Capgemini Research Institute. (2025, September). The software-driven mobility era: Beyond vehicles. https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/CRI_Software-Driven-Mobility-Final-Report.pdf
- [26]Rizvi, A., Hepp, D., & Jana, P. (2025, July 15). Winning the automotive software development race. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/winning-the-automotive-software-development-race
- [27]Lueth, K. L. (2026, March 4). 7 lessons manufacturers can learn from automakers in the era of software-defined everything. IoT Analytics. https://iot-analytics.com/7-lessons-manufacturers-can-learn-from-automakers-in-the-era-of-software-defined-everything/
- [28]Aptiv. (2023, March 28). What is agile software development in automotive? https://www.aptiv.com/en/insights/article/what-is-agile-software-development-in-automotive
- [29]Fenix. (2024). OEM vs. Tier 1 vs. Tier 2: Understanding the automotive supply chain. https://fenix-mfg.com/automotive-supply-chain-tiers/
- [30]Reuters. (2023, October 27). Volkswagen plans job cuts, further launch delays at software unit -manager magazin. https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/volkswagen-wants-cut-2000-jobs-cariad-unit-manager-magazin-2023-10-27/
