A Theoretical and Literature-Based Comparison of the Markowitz Model and the Index Model

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of two foundational portfolio models in modern finance: the Markowitz mean-variance model and the Sharpe single-index model. The study systematically examines their theoretical frameworks, computational requirements, empirical performance, and practical applicability. The Markowitz model, as a model-free optimisation framework, aims to achieve theoretically optimal risk-return trade-offs by fully considering pairwise covariances among assets. However, its high sensitivity to estimation errors and intensive data requirements often limit its empirical usefulness, particularly for large portfolios. In contrast, the index model simplifies covariance estimation by attributing asset return variations to a common market factor, thereby reducing parameter dimensionality and enhancing computational efficiency. Multi-factor extensions further improve explanatory power while maintaining practical feasibility. By reviewing existing literature and empirical evidence, this paper highlights the strengths, limitations, and appropriate application scenarios of both models. The findings provide guidance for investors, portfolio managers, and researchers in selecting or integrating portfolio models to balance theoretical rigor with empirical robustness and operational efficiency.