Prenatal Microplastic Exposure Impairs Offspring Neurodevelopment through the Placenta-Brain Axis

Main Article Content

Qingluo Zhang
Department of The First Clinical Medical School, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70267/shbe.2026255265

Keywords

microplastics, prenatal exposure, placenta-brain axis, fetal neurodevelopment, neurotoxicity

Abstract

Microplastics have emerged as environmental pollutants capable of crossing the maternal-fetal barrier and exerting adverse effects on fetal neurodevelopment. This review aims to elucidate how prenatal microplastic exposure impairs fetal brain development via the placenta-brain axis and to delineate its underlying neurotoxic mechanisms. Following maternal exposure via inhalation, ingestion, or dermal contact, microplastics enter the placenta via the blood and lymphatic systems. They are more likely to cross the placental barrier via energy- dependent active transport mechanisms. Microplastics can infiltrate fetal brain tissue through placental blood exchange or amniotic fluid ingestion, causing direct neural damage. They disrupt placental homeostasis, indirectly inhibiting fetal nervous system development. Prenatal microplastic exposure can interfere with core developmental events, including neural tube formation, cell proliferation and differentiation, neuronal migration, synaptogenesis, and myelination, leading to offspring phenotypes such as reduced spatial memory, decreased learning ability, impaired motor coordination, and anxiety-like behaviors. Furthermore, we conducted a bioinformatic analysis of transcriptomic data from microplastic-exposed human placenta (GSE220756) and mouse prefrontal cortex (GSE160012) retrieved from the GEO database, identifying shared regulatory pathways centered on aberrant vascular development, immune-inflammatory imbalance, and apoptotic dysregulation, particularly angiogenic impairment, which may serve as a critical node linking placental dysfunction to fetal neurotoxicity. However, limitations persist: small bioinformatic sample sizes, confounded lactational sampling in animal studies, exposure doses exceeding environmental relevance, and immature nanoplastic detection. Future work should expand the clinical specimens, establish standardized prenatal exposure models, integrate multi-omics with machine learning to identify predictive biomarkers, and validate the roles of angiogenic signaling.  

Abstract 36 | PDF Downloads 32

References

  • [1] T. R. Walker and L. Fequet, “Current trends of unsustainable plastic production and micro(nano)plastic pollution,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 160, p. 116984, 2023/03/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.116984.
  • [2] S. B. Fournier et al., “Nanopolystyrene translocation and fetal deposition after acute lung exposure during late-stage pregnancy,” (in eng), Part Fibre Toxicol, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 55, Oct 24 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12989-020-00385-9.
  • [3] C. M. Cary et al., “Ingested Polystyrene Nanospheres Translocate to Placenta and Fetal Tissues in Pregnant Rats: Potential Health Implications,” Nanomaterials, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 720, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/13/4/720.
  • [4] A. Ragusa et al., “Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta,” (in eng), Environ Int, vol. 146, p. 106274, Jan 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274.
  • [5] T. Braun et al., “Detection of Microplastic in Human Placenta and Meconium in a Clinical Setting,” (in eng), Pharmaceutics, vol. 13, no. 7, Jun 22 2021, doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070921.
  • [6] H. Sun, X. Su, J. Mao, Y. Liu, G. Li, and Q. Du, “Microplastics in maternal blood, fetal appendages, and umbilical vein blood,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 287, p. 117300, 2024/11/15/ 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117300.
  • [7] L. Tian et al., “Effects of nanoplastic exposure during pregnancy and lactation on neurodevelopment of rat offspring,” (in eng), J Hazard Mater, vol. 474, p. 134800, Aug 5 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134800.
  • [8] L. Tian et al., “Prenatal exposure on nanoplastics: A study of spatial transcriptomics in hippocampal offspring,” (in eng), Environ Pollut, vol. 366, p. 125480, Feb 1 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125480.
  • [9] J. Lee, S. Park, D. Y. Lee, and S.-H. Cho, “Maternal exposure to polypropylene nanoplastics disrupts sex- and region-specific lipid metabolism in the brains of C57BL/6N mouse offspring,” Toxicology, vol. 521, p. 154392, 2026/03/01/ 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2025.154392.
  • [10] H. Zhang, X. Ding, H. Zheng, Q. Ma, and T. Zhang, “Health Risks of Prenatal and Early-Life Microplastics Exposure: A Comprehensive Review,” (in eng), Environ Health (Wash), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 567-584, Apr 17 2026, doi: 10.1021/envhealth.5c00388.
  • [11] R. E. Zurub, Y. Cariaco, M. G. Wade, and S. A. Bainbridge, “Microplastics exposure: implications for human fertility, pregnancy and child health,” (in eng), Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), vol. 14, p. 1330396, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1330396.
  • [12] H. A. Leslie, M. J. M. van Velzen, S. H. Brandsma, A. D. Vethaak, J. J. Garcia-Vallejo, and M. H. Lamoree, “Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood,” (in eng), Environ Int, vol. 163, p. 107199, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199.
  • [13] W. Yang et al., “Impacts of microplastics on immunity,” (in eng), Front Toxicol, vol. 4, p. 956885, 2022, doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.956885.
  • [14] L. Zhu et al., “Tissue accumulation of microplastics and potential health risks in human,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 915, p. 170004, 2024/03/10/ 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170004.
  • [15] M. R. Syme, J. W. Paxton, and J. A. Keelan, “Drug transfer and metabolism by the human placenta,” (in eng), Clin Pharmacokinet, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 487-514, 2004, doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443080-00001.
  • [16] E. A. Medley, M. J. Spratlen, B. Yan, J. B. Herbstman, and M. A. Deyssenroth, “A Systematic Review of the Placental Translocation of Micro- and Nanoplastics,” (in eng), Curr Environ Health Rep, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 99-111, Jun 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40572-023-00391-x.
  • [17] P. Wick et al., “Barrier capacity of human placenta for nanosized materials,” (in eng), Environ Health Perspect, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 432-6, Mar 2010, doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901200.
  • [18] A. Ragusa et al., “Deeply in Plasticenta: Presence of Microplastics in the Intracellular Compartment of Human Placentas,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 18, p. 11593, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11593.
  • [19] S. Grafmueller et al., “Bidirectional Transfer Study of Polystyrene Nanoparticles across the Placental Barrier in an ex Vivo Human Placental Perfusion Model,” (in eng), Environ Health Perspect, vol. 123, no. 12, pp. 1280-6, Dec 2015, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409271.
  • [20] A. L. Marques et al., “Polystyrene microplastics internalization by term placental chorionic villi explants,” Placenta, vol. 173, pp. 102-110, 2026/01/01/ 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2025.06.002.
  • [21] J. Ye, Y. Ren, Y. Dong, and D. Fan, “Understanding the impact of nanoplastics on reproductive health: Exposure pathways, mechanisms, and implications,” Toxicology, vol. 504, p. 153792, 2024/05/01/ 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2024.153792.
  • [22] M. S.-L. Yee et al., “Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Human Health,” Nanomaterials, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 496, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/2/496.
  • [23] F. Shen, D. Li, J. Guo, and J. Chen, “Mechanistic toxicity assessment of differently sized and charged polystyrene nanoparticles based on human placental cells,” Water Research, vol. 223, p. 118960, 2022/09/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118960.
  • [24] L. Treuel, S. Brandholt, P. Maffre, S. Wiegele, L. Shang, and G. U. Nienhaus, “Impact of protein modification on the protein corona on nanoparticles and nanoparticle-cell interactions,” (in eng), ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 503-13, Jan 28 2014, doi: 10.1021/nn405019v.
  • [25] M. Segarra, M. R. Aburto, and A. Acker-Palmer, “Blood–Brain Barrier Dynamics to Maintain Brain Homeostasis,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 393-405, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.12.002.
  • [26] S. Shan, Y. Zhang, H. Zhao, T. Zeng, and X. Zhao, “Polystyrene nanoplastics penetrate across the blood- brain barrier and induce activation of microglia in the brain of mice,” Chemosphere, vol. 298, p. 134261, 2022/07/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134261.
  • [27] A. Kaushik, A. Singh, V. Kumar Gupta, and Y. K. Mishra, “Nano/micro-plastic, an invisible threat getting into the brain,” Chemosphere, vol. 361, p. 142380, 2024/08/01/ 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142380.
  • [28] S. B. Fournier et al., “Nanopolystyrene translocation and fetal deposition after acute lung exposure during late-stage pregnancy,” Particle and Fibre Toxicology, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 55, 2020/10/24 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12989-020-00385-9.
  • [29] Y. H. So et al., “Prenatal exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles induces neuroimmune dysregulation in the adult mouse brain,” (in eng), Zool Res, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1289-1303, Nov 18 2025, doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2025.255.
  • [30] R. Zhang et al., “Identification and analysis of microplastics in main organs of human fetus,” (in eng), Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, vol. 314, p. 120078, Apr 1 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2026.120078.
  • [31] J. Halfar et al., “Microplastics and additives in patients with preterm birth: The first evidence of their presence in both human amniotic fluid and placenta,” (in eng), Chemosphere, vol. 343, p. 140301, Dec 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140301.
  • [32] L. F. Amato-Lourenç o et al., “Microplastics in the Olfactory Bulb of the Human Brain,” (in eng), JAMA Netw Open, vol. 7, no. 9, p. e2440018, Sep 3 2024, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40018.
  • [33] J. Wang, Y. Yang, Y. Shi, L. Wei, L. Gao, and M. Liu, “Oxidized/unmodified-polyethylene microplastics neurotoxicity in mice: Perspective from microbiota-gut-brain axis,” (in eng), Environ Int, vol. 185, p. 108523, Mar 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108523.
  • [34] J. Lv et al., “Oligomeric lactic acid nanoplastics induce intrauterine growth restriction in mice by disrupting GATA2-mediated placental vascular development,” (in eng), PLoS Biol, vol. 24, no. 3, p. e3003676, Mar 2026, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003676.
  • [35] J. Bai, Y. Wang, S. Deng, Y. Yang, S. Chen, and Z. Wu, “Microplastics caused embryonic growth retardation and placental dysfunction in pregnant mice by activating GRP78/IRE1α/JNK axis induced apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress,” (in eng), Part Fibre Toxicol, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 36, Sep 11 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12989-024-00595-5.
  • [36] J. Hu et al., “Polystyrene microplastics disturb maternal-fetal immune balance and cause reproductive toxicity in pregnant mice,” (in eng), Reprod Toxicol, vol. 106, pp. 42-50, Dec 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.10.002.
  • [37] O. Baud and N. Berkane, “Hormonal Changes Associated With Intra-Uterine Growth Restriction: Impact on the Developing Brain and Future Neurodevelopment,” (in English), Frontiers in Endocrinology, Review vol. Volume 10 - 2019, 2019-March-26 2019, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00179.
  • [38] J. H. Nie, Y. Shen, M. Roshdy, X. Cheng, G. Wang, and X. Yang, “Polystyrene nanoplastics exposure caused defective neural tube morphogenesis through caveolae-mediated endocytosis and faulty apoptosis,” (in eng), Nanotoxicology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 885-904, Sep 2021, doi: 10.1080/17435390.2021.1930228.
  • [39] F. Wang et al., “Exposure to nano-polystyrene during pregnancy leads to Alzheimer's disease-related pathological changes in adult offspring,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 290, p. 117736, 2025/01/15/ 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117736.
  • [40] F. Huang et al., “Early-life exposure to polypropylene nanoplastics induces neurodevelopmental toxicity in mice and human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids,” (in eng), J Nanobiotechnology, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 474, Jul 1 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03561-1.
  • [41] D. A. Menassa and D. Gomez-Nicola, “Microglial Dynamics During Human Brain Development,” (in English), Frontiers in Immunology, Mini Review vol. Volume 9 - 2018, 2018-May-24 2018, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01014.
  • [42] M. E. Thomason, “Development of Brain Networks In Utero: Relevance for Common Neural Disorders,” (in eng), Biol Psychiatry, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 40-50, Jul 1 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.007.
  • [43] D. Yang et al., “Polystyrene micro- and nano-particle coexposure injures fetal thalamus by inducing ROS- mediated cell apoptosis,” Environment International, vol. 166, p. 107362, 2022/08/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107362.
  • [44] Y. Zhang et al., “Selective bioaccumulation of polystyrene nanoplastics in fetal rat brain and damage to myelin development,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 278, p. 116393, 2024/06/15/ 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116393.
  • [45] T. Zhang et al., “Regulation of synaptic function and lipid metabolism,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 21, no. 3, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://journals.lww.com/nrronline/fulltext/2026/03000/regulation_of_synaptic_function_and_lipid.15.a spx.
  • [46] G. Chen et al., “Spatial Lipid Metabolic Remodeling from Placenta to Multiple Suborgans during the Gestational Micro- or Nanoplastics Exposure,” (in eng), ACS Nano, vol. 19, no. 48, pp. 41062-41075, Dec 9 2025, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c13265.
  • [47] F. Amoruso et al., “Nanoplastics Impair GnRH Neuron Migration and Neuroendocrine Function: Emerging Players in the Pathogenesis of Reproductive Disorders,” (in eng), Small, vol. 22, no. 15, p. e06171, Mar 2026, doi: 10.1002/smll.202506171.
  • [48] L. F. Fowler, T. N. Burry, A. S. Maekawa, and L. S. Cahill, “A systematic review and experimental study of micro/nanoplastic-induced endocrine disruption in rodents: Potential links to autism spectrum disorder,” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 175, p. 105818, 2025/10/01/ 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2025.105818.
  • [49] G. Xia, T. Wan, Z. Chen, C. Liu, and R. Li, “Developmental Toxicity of Micro(Nano)Plastics (MNPs) Exposure in Mammals: A Mini-Review,” (in eng), Toxics, vol. 13, no. 3, Mar 19 2025, doi: 10.3390/toxics13030224.
  • [50] Y. P. Zhang, L. Tian, X. Q. Xie, Y. T. Wang, P. Lyu, and Z. G. Xi, “[Effects of nanopolystyrene nanoplastic exposure on the development and neurotoxicity of fetal rats during gestation],” (in chi), Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 760-765, Nov 2022, doi: 10.12047/j.cjap.6379.2022.138.
  • [51] J. Chen et al., “Maternal exposure to nanopolystyrene induces neurotoxicity in offspring through P53- mediated ferritinophagy and ferroptosis in the rat hippocampus,” (in eng), J Nanobiotechnology, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 651, Oct 23 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02911-9.
  • [52] J. Hanrahan et al., “Maternal exposure to polyethylene micro- and nanoplastics impairs umbilical blood flow but not fetal growth in pregnant mice,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 399, 2024/01/03 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50781-2.
  • [53] K. C. Dibbon et al., “Polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics cause placental dysfunction in mice†,” (in eng), Biol Reprod, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 211-218, Jan 13 2024, doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioad126.
  • [54] S. Xiong et al., “Maternal exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics causes defective retinal development and function in progeny mice by disturbing metabolic profiles,” (in eng), Chemosphere, vol. 352, p. 141513, Mar 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141513.
  • [55] B. Jeong et al., “Maternal exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics causes brain abnormalities in progeny,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 426, p. 127815, 2022/03/15/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127815.
  • [56] M. Piešová and M. Mach, “Impact of perinatal hypoxia on the developing brain,” (in eng), Physiol Res, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 199-213, Apr 30 2020, doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934198.
  • [57] F. Troncoso et al., “Disrupted brain angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier function underlie cognitive deficits in offspring of preeclampsia-like pregnancies,” (in eng), J Physiol, Jan 28 2026, doi: 10.1113/jp289605.
  • [58] Q. Li et al., “Development and validation of preeclampsia predictive models using key genes from bioinformatics and machine learning approaches,” (in eng), Front Immunol, vol. 15, p. 1416297, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1416297.

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published
Aug 11, 2026
Conference Proceedings Volume
Vol. 18 (2026): Proceedings of 2026 International Conference on Smart Healthcare and Biomedical Engineering (ICSHBE 2026)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Zhang, Qingluo. “Prenatal Microplastic Exposure Impairs Offspring Neurodevelopment through the Placenta-Brain Axis”. Exploring Science Academic Conference Series, vol. 18, Aug. 2026, pp. 255-6, https://doi.org/10.70267/shbe.2026255265.