Data-Driven AIGC Exhibition Evaluation Framework Research: Model Construction and Empirical Analysis
Main Article Content
Keywords
AIGC art exhibitions, evaluation framework, data-driven, multimodal perception, user experience evaluation
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) has been used more and more in art exhibitions in recent years. At the same time, evaluating AIGC-based exhibitions is still difficult because existing methods often rely on limited indicators or subjective judgments. To deal with this problem, this paper develops a data-based evaluation approach by combining different kinds of information. The study brings together design features generated by AIGC, audience behavior recorded during exhibitions, and questionnaire results. These different types of data are analyzed together. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) is used to examine the relationships among technological characteristics, audience behavior, and exhibition perception. XGBoost is then applied to predict exhibition experience and to identify the factors that have relatively larger effects on the evaluation results. Based on the above analysis, the study further combines information from technology, exhibition space, and audience responses to form an evaluation process. The results indicate that this method can partly reduce the subjectivity that exists in traditional exhibition evaluation. In addition, the analysis shows that AIGC-generated visual diversity has a positive relatio nship with visitors’ narrative immersion. The prediction model also shows better consistency than some traditional evaluation approaches. These findings suggest that quantitative analysis can provide another way to understand AIGC exhibitions, especially in terms of content design, curatorial choices, and future evaluation practices.
References
- [1] Tian, Z., Wang, X., Tan, Y., Na, H. J., & Kim, C. (2025). Utilizing unstructured data to predict the art museum visitor numbers using deep learning approaches. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 41684.
- [2] 진기쉬, 최명철, 링운첸, & 김한얼. (2022). Impact of Digital Technology on the Art Museum Industry"s Business Model. The International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 116-121.
- [3] Cotter, K. N., Rodriguez-Boerwinkle, R. M., Silver, S., Hardy, M., Putney, H., & Pawelski, J. O. (2024). Emotional experiences, well-being, and ill-being during art museum visits: A latent class analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(1), 24.
- [4] Yi, T., Lee, H. Y., Yum, J., & Lee, J. H. (2022). The influence of visitor-based social contextual information on visitors’ museum experience. Plos one, 17(5), e0266856.
- [5] Wang, T. Y., & Liu, H. L. (2025). An exploration of the application of AIGC technology in intelligent museum exhibitions. Industrial Innovation Research, (2), 100–102.
- [6] Chen, Y. Y., Lin, R. T., & Zhang, J. (2026). Research on the digital innovation pathways of Li brocade driven by generative artificial intelligence. Tiangong, (4), 91–94.
- [7] Hassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience design: Technology for all the right reasons (Vol. 8). Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
- [8] Hutton, S. B. (2019). Eye tracking methodology. In Eye movement research: An introduction to its scientific foundations and applications (pp. 277-308). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- [9] Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal activity. Springer science & business media.
- [10] Mu, S., Cui, M., & Huang, X. (2020). Multimodal data fusion in learning analytics: A systematic review. Sensors, 20(23), 6856.
- [11] Liu, X., Yang, B., Cheng, H., & Sun, Y. (2023). Investigating the impact of AIGC features on the users' perception of the persuasiveness of AIGC: A perspective of two-dimensional awe emotions.
- [12] Cohn, C., Davalos, E., Vatral, C., Fonteles, J. H., Wang, H. D., Coursey, A.,... & Biswas, G. (2024). Multimodal methods for analyzing learning and training environments: A systematic literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14491.
- [13] Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240.
- [14] Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549.
- [15] Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016, August). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 785-794).
- [16] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
- [17] Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.
- [18] Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T.,... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 57, 101994.
