Federated Learning as a Privacy-Enhancing Framework: Risks, Protection Mechanisms, and Applications
Main Article Content
Keywords
federated learning, privacy-preserving artificial intelligence, differential privacy, secure aggregation, healthcare AI, mobile keyboard prediction
Abstract
Federated learning has become a major approach for training artificial intelligence systems when data is distributed across institutions, devices, or users. Its central appeal is that raw data can remain local while model updates are coordinated through a shared training process. This paper argues that federated learning should be evaluated as a privacy-enhancing framework rather than as a complete privacy guarantee. It first identifies key privacy risks, including model-update leakage, gradient inversion, membership inference, and risks created by malicious participants. It then classifies protection mechanisms into architectural choices, optimization design, differential privacy, secure aggregation, and deployment constraints. The paper proposes a comparative framework that asks what federated learning protects, what it still exposes, and which auxiliary mechanisms are needed in different application settings. Healthcare AI and mobile keyboard prediction are used as contrasting case studies: the former is typically cross-silo and institutionally governed, while the latter is cross-device and large-scale. The analysis concludes that federated learning is most effective when combined with explicit threat models, layered privacy protections, security controls, and governance arrangements.
References
- [1] McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Agü era y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication- efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1273-1282.
- [2] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., et al. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1-2), 1-210.
- [3] Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), Article 12.
- [4] Li, X., Huang, K., Yang, W., Wang, S., & Zhang, Z. (2020). On the convergence of FedAvg on non-IID data. International Conference on Learning Representations.
- [5] Zhu, L., Liu, Z., & Han, S. (2019). Deep leakage from gradients. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop.
- [6] Geiping, J., Bauermeister, H., Drö ge, H., & Moeller, M. (2020). Inverting gradients: How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 16937 - 16947.
- [7] Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017). Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 3-18.
- [8] Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006). Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. Theory of Cryptography Conference, 265-284.
- [9] Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3-4), 211-407.
- [10] Geyer, R. C., Klein, T., & Nabi, M. (2017). Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07557.
- [11] McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2018). Learning differentially private recurrent language models. International Conference on Learning Representations.
- [12] Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1175-1191.
- [13] Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., Huba, D., Ingerman, A., Ivanov, V., Kiddon, C., Konečný, J., Mazzocchi, S., McMahan, H. B., Van Overveldt, T., Petrou, D., Ramage, D., & Roselander, J. (2019). Towards federated learning at scale: System design. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Sy stems, 1, 374-388.
- [14] Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, Article 119.
- [15] Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., Martin, J., Pati, S., Kotrotsou, A., Milchenko, M., Xu, W., Marcus, D., Colen, R. R., & Bakas, S. (2020). Federated learning in medicine: Facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 12598.
- [16] Dayan, I., Roth, H. R., Zhong, A., Harouni, A., Gentili, A., Abidin, A. Z., Liu, A., Beardsworth Costa, A., Wood, B. J., Tsai, C. S., et al. (2021). Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 27, 1735-1743.
- [17] Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., Ramaswamy, S., Beaufays, F., Augenstein, S., Eichner, H., Kiddon, C., & Ramage, D. (2018). Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604.
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.