Machine Learning for Binary Classification of Daily Stock Price Movements in the Chinese A-Share Market: A Narrative Review

Main Article Content

Qinyuan Wu

Keywords

stock trend prediction, machine learning, model comparison, narrative review, financial time series

Abstract

The stock market exhibits characteristics such as high volatility, nonlinearity, and strong noise. Precisely predicting stock price trends has long been a challenging issue in quantitative finance. Current research often conflates the two prediction tasks: stock trend classification and price return regression. Common issues include inappropriate model selection and unclear applicability to the scenario. In response to the research challenges mentioned, this paper focuses on stock trend prediction, identifies the drawbacks of mainstream models, and provides references and guidance for subsequent research. This article adopts the narrative review method. It examines the empirical literature published from 2020 to 2025, comparing the representative methods such as SVM, XGBoost, LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and Transformer from four aspects: model principles, experimental design, prediction performance, and application scenarios. As a result, different models have their own applicable scenarios based on data characteristics, market environment, and prediction periods. The cost-benefit ratio of XGBoost in the low-frequency prediction scenario is relatively high. LSTM is the current mainstream model in this field. The transformer only has a slight performance advantage in high-frequency and large-sample scenarios. The out-of-sample accuracy of daily stock trend prediction has remained stable between 52% and 60% over the long term. Currently, several common problems in this field include sample category imbalance, non-standard time-series experimental designs that lead to artificially high prediction accuracy, misalignment between classification accuracy and real trading returns, and a lack of interpretability in deep learning models. Based on the research findings, this paper proposes optimization paths across four dimensions: experimental norms, evaluation system, model interpretability, and multimodal feature construction, to advance the intelligent stock trend prediction model towards standardization, practicality, and interpretability.

Abstract 38 | PDF Downloads 32

References

  • [1]Bilokon, P., & Qiu, Y. (2023). Transformers versus LSTMs for Electronic Trading. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11400.
  • [2]People's Bank of China. (2021). Financial Technology Development Plan (2022-2025) [Policy document]
  • [3]Zou, J., Zhao, Q., Jiao, Y., et al. (2022). Stock Market Prediction via Deep Learning Techniques: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12717.
  • [4]Chen, Q. (2022). Stock Market Prediction Using Machine Learning. ICBBEM 2022, Atlantis Press, Atlantics Highlights in Intelligent Systems, 5, pp. 458-465.
  • [5]Sonkavde, G., Dharrao, D. S., Bongale, A. M., et al. (2023). Forecasting Stock Market Prices Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models: A Systematic Review, Performance Analysis and Discussion of Implications. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), 94.
  • [6]Zhang, X., & Wen, X. (2023). Research on Stock Index Rise-Fall Prediction Strategy Based on XGBoost. Computer & Digital Engineering, 51(03), 686-689.
  • [7]Zhang, J., Ye, L., & Lai, Y. (2023). Stock Price Prediction Using CNN-BiLSTM-Attention Model. Mathematics, 11(9), 1985.
  • [8]Sun, Y., Sun, Q., & Zhu, S. (2022). Prediction of Shanghai Stock Index Based on Investor Sentiment and CNN-LSTM Model. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 10(6), 620-632.
  • [9]Ranjbaran, G., Recupero, D. R., Lombardo, G., & Consoli, S. (2023). Leveraging augmentation techniques for tasks with unbalancedness within the financial domain: a two-level ensemble approach. EPJ Data Science, 12, 24.
  • [10]Wang, Y., & Yan, K. (2023). Machine learning-based quantitative trading strategies across different time intervals in the American market. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 7(4), 569-594.
  • [11]Chen, H., Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2022). Explaining a series of models by propagating Shapley values. Nature Communications, 13, 4512.