Analysis of Hegemony in Shame from the Perspective of Postcolonialism
Main Article Content
Keywords
John Maxwell Coetzee, Shame, hegemony, postcolonialism
Abstract
The Nobel Prize winner JM Coetzee's novel Shame was set in postcolonial South Africa. The experiences of the protagonist, Professor Lurie and his daughter Lucy, profoundly expose the continuing influence of colonial heritage and racial hegemony. In the novel, the power reversal, the fight for land ownership, and the violent conflict between whites and blacks not only reflected the complexity of identity politics in postcolonial society but also implied the criticism of Western cultural hegemony and the racial hierarchy. At the same time, the sexual assault scandal of Lurie and the violence suffered by Lucy are metaphors for the dual discipline of the body and spirit of the individual by colonial history. From the perspective of postcolonialism, this paper analyzes how colonial elites beautify exploitative behavior as the “mission of civilization” and how emerging power reconstructs the ruling order through violent means. Furthermore, against the background of contemporary globalization, this paper aims to provide critical reflection and theoretical enlightenment on the issue of cultural hegemony in global governance.
References
- Bao, M. (2018). The narrow victory of new culturalism: American films in the context of social transformation [Online]. Available: https://book.douban.com/review/9467381/ [Accessed October 30, 2025].
- Cai, S. (2000). A response from realistic literature to the clash of civilizations theory: Text analysis of disgrace By J. M. Coetzee Foreign Literature Studies, no. 4, pp. 97-101,174.
- Ding, J. and Chen, L. (2019). Marginalised groups in the novel shame from a postcolonial perspective. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 42-49.
- Hu, Y. (2018). The construction of American values and the consolidation of national identity. Journal of Shaanxi Administrative College, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 16-20.
- Kulich, S. J., Komisarof, A., Smith, L. R. and Cushner, K. (2021). Re-examining intercultural research and relations in the COVID pandemic. vol. 80, pp. A1-A6.
- Li, H. (2018). A brief discussion on the influence of American culture on China's ‘post-00s’ generation. Shanghai Business, no. 8, pp. 22-24.
- Liu, Y. (2024). Alienation, Hegemony and Reconstruction: A Post-Colonial Analysis of the Cultural Identity Crisis of the Diasporas in "The Seaside". Master's Thesis, Shandong University.
- Lü, B. (2013). The influence of American white culture on black cultural identity recognition (English). Ideological Frontline, vol. 39, no. S2, pp. 206-207.
- Mao, H. (2007). Realism's reflection on the postcolonial postmodern dilemma: An interpretation of the meaning of J. M. Coetzee's novel disgrace. Theory Monthly, no. 3, pp. 125-127.
- Nobel Prize (2003). The Nobel Prize in Literature 2003 John Maxwell Coetzee [Online]. Available: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2003/press-release/ [Accessed October 30, 2025].
- Ouyang, K. and Zhong, L. (2014). How does the United States promote its own values [Online]. Available: http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2014/1013/c49150-25820716.html [Accessed October 30, 2025].
- Sheng, A. (2004). A Study of Homi Bhabha's Postcolonial Theory. Master's Thesis, Beijing Language and Culture University.
- Wang, M. (2010). The scars of human civilization: A postcolonial study of JM Coetzee’s novel Shame. Examination Weekly, no. 40, pp. 31-32.
- Wu, L. and Zheng, H. (2017). Postcolonial interpretation of American culture in film distribution: Its impact and implications for Chinese university students. Journal of Puer University, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 40-41.
- Xi, Q. (2014). A brief discussion on the American film and television image and its influences from the cultural perspective. Journal of Guangxi Economics and Management College, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 59-64.
- Xin, X. (2016). American cultural hegemony and Chinese cultural security. Leadership Science Forum, no. 8, pp. 69-84.
