Analysis of the Relationship by Which Patent-Based Enterprise Clusters Influence the Development of Midstream Enterprises in a Low-Altitude Economy
Main Article Content
Keywords
low-altitude economy, industrial clusters, patent-intensive firms, knowledge spillovers, midstream manufacturing
Abstract
This paper examines how patent-driven enterprise clusters influence the development of midstream industries within the low-altitude economy. Using provincial-level panel data from China covering 2015–2025, we construct an econometric framework with the number of midstream enterprises as the dependent variable and the concentration of patent-based enterprises as the core explanatory variable. Controlling for factors such as industry scale, innovation environment, upstream/downstream support, infrastructure, and policies, we employ OLS, two-way fixed effects, and Poisson/negative binomial count models, incorporating lagged terms and multiple robustness tests. Results indicate a stable positive correlation between patent-intensive enterprise agglomeration and midstream development. Count models yield significant findings, while fixed effects show consistent directionality but weaker short-term statistical significance, suggesting cumulative and lagged effects. Mechanism analysis supports two primary transmission pathways: “knowledge spillovers” and “supply chain collaboration.” Policy recommendations include anchoring midstream development to establish standard/testing and certification platforms, enhancing patent pools and intellectual property finance, and promoting upstream-downstream collaborative innovation and high-quality clustering. Study limitations lie in identification and data granularity; future research should integrate firm-level microdata and patent citations to further validate causality and characterize heterogeneous effects.
References
- Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P. and Carlsson, B., (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 15-30.
- Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. and Feldman, M. P., (2002). Patents and innovation in economic development. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 847-857.
- Audretsch, D. B. and Feldman, M. P., (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 630-640.
- Delgado, M., Porter, M. E. and Stern, S., (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1785-1799.
- Feldman, M. P. and Audretsch, D. B., (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 409-429.
- Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R., (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. the Quarterly journal of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 577-598.
- Ketels, C. and Protsiv, S., (2021). What makes a cluster more resilient? Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 342-359.
- Marshall, A., (1920). Principles of Economics, (8th ed.) London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1890).
- Porter, M. E., (1990). The competitive advantage of nations, New York: Free Press.
- Porter, M. E., (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review Boston, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 77-90.
- Storper, M. and Venables, A. J., (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of economic geography, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 351-370.
