ESG Performance of Listed Companies and Labor Cost Stickiness
Main Article Content
Keywords
ESG performance, labor cost stickiness, corporate social responsibility, property rights heterogeneity
Abstract
In the context of sustainable development and the “dual carbon” goals, the impact of corporate ESG performance on cost behavior has attracted increasing attention. This study employs a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2024 to examine the impact of ESG performance on labor cost stickiness. The findings show that overall ESG performance has no significant direct impact on labor cost stickiness. However, dimension-specific analyses indicate that the social responsibility (S) dimension significantly suppresses cost stickiness, while the environmental (E) and governance (G) dimensions have no significant effect. Further analysis reveals that the moderating effects of ownership type and regional development levels on ESG are heterogeneous, and ESG practices in state-owned enterprises and enterprises in the central and western regions of China have not effectively reduced labor cost stickiness. The findings suggest that the current structural limitations of ESG ratings and differences in institutional environments are key factors affecting the cost management effectiveness of ESG practices.
References
- Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y. and Zhang, C., (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management science, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 4451-4469.
- Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D. and Janakiraman, S. N., (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of accounting research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 47-63.
- Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D. and Chen, L. T., (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of accounting and economics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 111-127.
- Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L. and Wagner, H. F., (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of financial economics, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 693-714.
- El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. and Mishra, D. R., (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of banking & finance, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2388-2406.
- Fan, H. J. and Zheng, Z., (2024). Digital asset allocation, management innovation and cost stickiness. Journal of University of Jinan(Social Science Edition), vol. 34, no. 01, pp. 69-83.
- Fatemi, A., Glaum, M. and Kaiser, S., (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The mediating role of growth. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 316-329.
- Geng, Y. and Wang, L., (2019). Cost stickiness, internal control quality and corporate risk: empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies Accounting Research, no. 5, pp. 75-81.
- Gillan, S. L., Koch, A. and Starks, L. T., (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 66, p. 101889.
- Gu, Z., Li, G., Li, Z. and Yang, Y. G., (2012). Friends in need are friends indeed: The effect of social ties on labor investment efficiency. Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2432-2465.
- Gu, Z., Tang, S. and Wu, D., (2020). The effect of labor unionization on bidding behavior: evidence from firms’ cost structure. Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 23-41.
- HUANG, D. Z., (2021). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activity and innovation efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 279, p. 123170.
- Jiang, W., Wan, H. and Zhao, S., (2020). Internal control and cost stickiness: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 379-402.
- John, K., Li, J. and Wang, Y., (2020). Employee welfare and corporate cost behavior. Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 72, no. 102155.
- Kitzmueller, M. and Shimshack, J., (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of economic literature, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 51-84.
- Mei, Y. L. and Zhang, Q., (2023). The impact of ESG performance on corporate debt financing costs. Finance and Economy, no. 02, pp. 51-63.
- Sun, X., (2023). Research on the impact of enterprise digital transformation on labor cost stickiness. Management World, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 158-176.
- Wang, D. Y. and Wu, H., (2024). The impact of ESG performance on firm cost stickiness. Finance and Accounting Monthly, vol. 45, no. 19, pp. 68-74.
- Weiss, D., (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The accounting review, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1441-1471.
- Yan, W. X., Zhao, Y. and Meng, D. F., (2023). Study on the influence of ESG rating on the financial performance of listed companies. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, vol. 20, no. 06, pp. 71-80.
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.