Research on Stock Realized Volatility Prediction Using Multi-Models Incorporating International Macro Factors

Main Article Content

Jiarui He

Keywords

realized volatility, multi-factor model, linear regression, machine learning, volatility forecasting

Abstract

Predicting realized volatility (RV) is crucial for asset allocation and risk management. Existing multi-factor research on predicting realized volatility in stocks has rarely incorporated international macroeconomic factors, and the comparison of machine learning models remains limited. This paper constructs a multi-factor framework combining technical and international macroeconomic factors using monthly data from the 50 most liquid stocks in the CSI 300 Index from 2018 to 2024. Three models-ridge regression, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and a multilayer perceptron (MLP)-are used to predict the next period's RV. Results show that incorporating international macroeconomic factors improves the forecast accuracy of all models, with machine learning performing even better on the test set (R²≈0.43). The study finds that incorporating international macroeconomic factors significantly improves model forecast accuracy, with machine learning outperforming linear regression models. This research provides a reference for selecting methods for volatility forecasting in different market scenarios and offers theoretical insights for investors, asset pricing, and risk management.

Abstract 7 | PDF Downloads 3

References

  • Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X. and Labys, P., (2003). Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 579-625.
  • Bouri, E., Gkillas, K., Gupta, R. and Pierdzioch, C., (2021). Forecasting realized volatility of bitcoin: The role of the trade war. Computational Economics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 29-53.
  • Corsi, F., (2009). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of financial econometrics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 174-196.
  • Department of Cooperation of the Ministry of Commerce and State Administration of Foreign Exchange, (2025). Brief Statistics of China’s Outward Direct Investment in All Industries in 2024 [Online]. Available: http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/tjsj/gwjjhztj/art/2025/art_044cb9f995184b4e88970994c22a7881.html [Accessed December 12, 2025].
  • Girardin, E. and Joyeux, R., (2013). Macro fundamentals as a source of stock market volatility in China: A GARCH-MIDAS approach. Economic Modelling, vol. 34, pp. 59-68.
  • Gunnarsson, E. S., Isern, H. R., Kaloudis, A., Risstad, M., Vigdel, B. and Westgaard, S., (2024). Prediction of realized volatility and implied volatility indices using AI and machine learning: A review. International review of financial analysis, vol. 93, p. 103221.
  • Liu, J., Ma, F. and Zhang, Y., (2019). Forecasting the Chinese stock volatility across global stock markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 525, pp. 466-477.
  • Scikit-learn developers, (n.d.). TimeSeriesSplit - scikit-learn 1.8.0 documentation [Online]. In scikit-learn. Available: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.model_selection.TimeSeriesSplit.html [Accessed December 12, 2025].
  • Tushare, (2025). Tushare Pro platform and interface documentation [Online]. Available: https://tushare.pro/document/2 [Accessed December 16, 2025].
  • Zhu, H., Bai, L., He, L. and Liu, Z., (2023). Forecasting realized volatility with machine learning: Panel data perspective. Journal of Empirical Finance, vol. 73, pp. 251-271.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 48

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.