Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for the Recovery of Unilateral Visual Impairment After Stroke: A Systematic Review

Main Article Content

Xinyi Zhang
School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Yuxia Ma
School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70267/lshe.20260114

Keywords

noninvasive brain stimulation, stroke, unilateral visual impairment

Abstract

According to data from the Global Stroke Report 2025, stroke accounted for 10.72% of all deaths worldwide in 2021. Monocular visual field defects represent one of the most prevalent and severe cognitive impairments following stroke, with a prevalence rate reaching up to 30%. Current conventional treatments for monocular visual field defects yield limited efficacy, whilst non-invasive brain stimulation techniques are advancing rapidly. With the continuous development of these non-invasive brain stimulation technologies, an increasing body of research indicates that they may offer certain restorative effects for post-stroke hemianopia. To synthesize the effects of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in the recovery of unilateral visual impairment after stroke. A comprehensive search was conducted in six databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wan fang, and VIP, as of January 3, 2026. The articles were screened based on the exclusion criteria. The included articles were analyzed based on their impact on visual function improvement, quality of life, and adverse effects. Sixteen studies were analyzed, demonstrating that noninvasive brain stimulation significantly improved visual function and quality of life for patients. Additionally, adverse effects were minimal. Noninvasive brain stimulation technology shows promise in the recovery of unilateral visual impairment after stroke. However, further multi-center, large-sample, high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to verify its efficacy and safety.

Abstract 17 | PDF Downloads 11

References

  • [1] MARTIN S S, ADAY A W, ALLEN N B, et al. 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association [J]. Circulation, 2025, 151(8): e41-e660.
  • [2] ZHANG J, WANG X, HUANG F, et al. Effect of Eye-Tracking Technology-Based Visual Scanning Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke [J]. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2025, (223).
  • [3] HEILMAN K M, VALENSTEIN E, WATSON R T. Neglect and related disorders [J]. Seminars in neurology, 2000, 20(4): 463-70.
  • [4] BOWEN A, HAZELTON C, POLLOCK A, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke [J]. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013, 2013(7): Cd003586.
  • [5] SUPPA A, HUANG Y Z, FUNKE K, et al. Ten Years of Theta Burst Stimulation in Humans: Established Knowledge, Unknowns and Prospects [J]. Brain stimulation, 2016, 9(3): 323-35.
  • [6] RINGMAN J M, SAVER J L, WOOLSON R F, et al. Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort [J]. Neurology, 2004, 63(3): 468-74.
  • [7] HAO Z, WANG D, ZENG Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke [J]. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013, 2013(5): Cd008862.
  • [8] PASCUAL-LEONE A, VALLS-SOLé J, WASSERMANN E M, et al. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex [J]. Brain : a journal of neurology, 1994, 117 ( Pt 4): 847-58.
  • [9] OBERMAN L, EDWARDS D, ELDAIEF M, et al. Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature [J]. Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 2011, 28(1): 67-74.
  • [10] YANG W, LIU T T, SONG X B, et al. Comparison of different stimulation parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2015, 359(1-2): 219-25.
  • [11] KIM Y K, JUNG J H, SHIN S H. A comparison of the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) by number of stimulation sessions on hemispatial neglect in chronic stroke patients [J]. Exp Brain Res, 2015, 233(1): 283-9.
  • [12] FU W, CAO L, ZHANG Y, et al. Continuous theta-burst stimulation may improve visuospatial neglect via modulating the attention network: a randomized controlled study [J]. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 2017, 24(4): 236-41.
  • [13] VATANPARASTI S, KAZEMNEJAD A, YOONESSI A, et al. The Effect of Continuous Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Prism Adaptation on the Neglect Recovery in Stroke Patients [J]. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2019, 28(11): 104296.
  • [14] YI Y G, CHUN M H, DO K H, et al. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neglect Syndrome in Stroke Patients [J]. Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2016, 40(2): 223-9.
  • [15] CHA H G, KIM M K. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on arm function and decreasing unilateral spatial neglect in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Clinical rehabilitation, 2016, 30(7): 649-56.
  • [16] CHA H G, KIM M K. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on unilateral neglect of acute stroke patients: A randomised controlled trial [J]. Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao, 2015, 33(2): 53-8.
  • [17] YE L, ZHAO W, ZHANG Y, et al. Exploring Neurobiological Effects of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation on the Left Cerebellum for Post-stroke Unilateral Neglect: A Preliminary Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Investigation [J]. Cerebellum, 2025, 24(4): 103.
  • [18] CAO L, FU W, ZHANG Y, et al. Intermittent θ burst stimulation modulates resting-state functional connectivity in the attention network and promotes behavioral recovery in patients with visual spatial neglect [J]. Neuroreport, 2016, 27(17): 1261-5.
  • [19] SONG W, DU B, XU Q, et al. Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation for visual spatial neglect: a pilot study [J]. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2009, 41(3): 162-5.
  • [20] IWAŃSKI S, LEŚNIAK M, POLANOWSKA K, et al. Neuronavigated 1 Hz rTMS of the left angular gyrus combined with visuospatial therapy in post-stroke neglect [J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2020, 46(1): 83-93.
  • [21] LEARMONTH G, BENWELL C S Y, MäRKER G, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation in Stroke patients (NIBS): a prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) feasibility trial using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke hemispatial neglect [J]. Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2021, 31(8): 1163‐89.
  • [22] ZHAO W, YE L, ZHANG Y, et al. Potential neurophysiological mechanisms of intermittent theta-burst stimulation to the left prefrontal cortex for post-stroke unilateral neglect: An exploratory transcranial magnetic stimulation - electroencephalography study [J]. IBRO Neurosci Rep, 2025, 19: 604-13.
  • [23] LIM J Y, KANG E K, PAIK N J. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to hemispatial neglect in patients after stroke: an open-label pilot study [J]. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2010, 42(5): 447-52.
  • [24] NYFFELER T, VANBELLINGEN T, KAUFMANN B C, et al. Theta burst stimulation in neglect after stroke: functional outcome and response variability origins [J]. Brain : a journal of neurology, 2019, 142(4): 992-1008.
  • [25] ZHANG Y, M., FU W, HU J, et al. The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on unilateral spatial neglect and motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients [J]. Chinese journal of cerebrovascular diseases, 2013, 10(02): 74-8.
  • [26] HUMMEL F C, COHEN L G. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? [J]. The Lancet Neurology, 2006, 5(8): 708-12.
  • [27] TING D S, POLLOCK A, DUTTON G N, et al. Visual neglect following stroke: current concepts and future focus [J]. Survey of ophthalmology, 2011, 56(2): 114-34.
  • [28] KIM Y H, MIN S J, KO M H, et al. Facilitating visuospatial attention for the contralateral hemifield by repetitive TMS on the posterior parietal cortex [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2005, 382(3): 280-5.
  • [29] SALAZAR A P S, VAZ P G, MARCHESE R R, et al. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Hemispatial Neglect After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2018, 99(2): 355-66.e1.

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published
Mar 24, 2026
Conference Proceedings Volume
Vol. 12 (2026): Proceedings of the 2026 International Conference on Life Sciences and Health Engineering (IC-LSHE 2026)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Zhang, Xinyi, and Yuxia Ma. “Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for the Recovery of Unilateral Visual Impairment After Stroke: A Systematic Review”. Exploring Science Academic Conference Series, vol. 12, Mar. 2026, pp. 118-2, https://doi.org/10.70267/lshe.20260114.