Legal Risk Determination of “AI Face Swapping”
Main Article Content
Keywords
AI face swapping, copyright, portrait right, fair use, liability allocation
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, AI face-swapping technology has been widely applied in fields such as film, television, and advertising. However, it has also triggered numerous legal risks. Therefore, by analyzing relevant legal provisions and typical cases, clarifying the criteria for determining copyright and portrait right infringements in AI face-swapping activities, as well as the principles for allocating liability among multiple subjects, effective legal guidance can be provided for the compliant application of AI face-swapping technology and for rights holders to protect their rights. At the copyright level, the determination of the “access” element should adopt a relaxed standard, and AI face swapping should be assessed for substantial similarity through a combination of the “overall impression method” and the “abstraction-filtration-comparison method.” At the portrait right level, as long as the public can associate the synthetic content with a specific natural person, it constitutes “identifiability” and is suspected of infringing personal information, regardless of whether there is profit motive. In practice, the infringer must simultaneously bear joint liability for both copyright and portrait right infringements; if a platform fails to promptly fulfill its “reasonable care” obligation by taking necessary measures such as deletion or blocking, it shall bear joint and several liability; and if the provider of AI face-swapping technology fails to establish necessary mechanisms to fulfill its reasonable control obligations, it shall bear presumed fault liability.
References
- Beijing Internet Court. (2023). Liao v. A Certain Company (Network Tort Liability Dispute) (Civil Judgment No. (2023) Jing 0491 Min Chu 3820).
- Feng, X. Q., & Diao, J. X. (2019). Research on transformative use and copyright infringement boundaries: Based on marketist and functionalist analytical perspectives. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences Edition), 33(5), 134-143.
- Jiading District People’s Court of Shanghai. (2024). Chen v. Shanghai Yi Network Technology Co., Ltd. (Civil Judgment No. (2024) Hu 0114 Min Chu 1326).
- Liang, J. J. (2025). Research on infringement issues in the application of AI face-swapping technology on short video platforms. Henan Science and Technology, 52(22), 125-129.
- Lin, A. J., & Lin, Q. M. (2023). Technical risks and multiple regulations of AI face swapping. Future Communication, 30(1), 60-69.
- Shao, H. H. (2023). Research on copyright infringement governance of generative artificial intelligence. Publishing and Distribution Research, (6), 29-38.
- Sun, S., & Zeng, Y. Z. (2025). Chinese experience and future development of the judicial application of the copyright fair use system. Suzhou University Journal (Law Edition), 12(2), 100-112.
- Wang, G. (2024). Reshaping the “access” element in copyright infringement determination by generative artificial intelligence. Editors’ Friend, (12), 91-100.
- Xu, P. (2025, September 18). AI “face swapping” is not “fair use”: Technological application must respect copyright boundaries. China Press, Publication, Radio and Television Gazette, 007.
- Yang, X., & Deng, Z. Y. (2024). Dilemmas and solutions for applying fair use in AIGC creation. Publishing Panorama, (17), 75-80.
- Zhang, H. B., & Hou, Y. Y. (2024). From technology to law: Infringement risks and regulatory governance of AI face-swapping short videos. Journal of Beijing University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 40(1), 124-132.
- Zhang, H. B., & Wang, H. B. (2025). From technologicalism to legal evaluation: Possibilities and judgment standards of AIGC copyright infringement. Editors’ Friend, (11), 80-91.
- Zhang, X. B., & Bian, L. (2025). On the presumed fault liability of generative artificial intelligence service providers. Northern Legal Science, 19(5), 5-19.
- Zhao, W. (n.d.). Judicial challenges and rule reconstruction of AI face swapping: Boundary research on fair use of portrait rights in micro short dramas. New Media and Society, 1-13.
