From Bench to Bedside: Multidimensional Clinical Applications and Challenges of CRISPR Genome Editing
Main Article Content
Keywords
CRISPR-CAS9, T-cell, gene therapy, hematological genetic diseases, antiviral immunity
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has shifted from the laboratory to clinical application in specific diseases, where, in β-hemoglobinopathies, disrupting the BCL11A erythroid enhancer can reactivate fetal hemoglobin, functionally curing transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia and sickle cell disease, ultimately giving birth to Casgevy™, the first approved CRISPR therapy. In oncology field, CRISPR-engineered T cells precisely insert CARs into TRAC locus or knock out immune checkpoints such as PD-1, thereby showing enhanced persistence, reduced exhaustion and high response rates in hematologic malignancies such as multiple myeloma, while in solid tumors, α-thalassemia due to large fragment deletions of HBA1/HBA2, hemophilia A limited by F8 cDNA size exceeding viral packaging capacity and acute respiratory viral infections such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza, significant obstacles still exist. These challenges include inefficient delivery, lack of physiological bypass mechanisms, rapid viral mutation, and a narrow therapeutic window; furthermore, Casgevy™’s cost of up to 2.2 million dollars highlights a critical accessibility gap, with use limited to affluent healthcare systems. Emerging solutions include double-strand break-free base editors and prime editors, in vivo delivery via lipid nanoparticles, and multimodal therapeutic regimens; however, without synchronous progress in equitable pricing and global accessibility, CRISPR’s curative potential will remain unrealized for the majority of patients worldwide.
References
- [1] Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A. and Charpentier, E. A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science. 2012, 337(6096), pp. 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829.
- [2] Stadtmauer, E. A., Fraietta, J. A., Davis, M. M., Cohen, A. D., Weber, K. L., Lancaster, E., Mangan, P. A., Kulikovskaya, I., Gupta, M. and Chen, F. CRISPR-engineered T cells in patients with refractory cancer. Science. 2020, 367(6481), p. eaba7365. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7365.
- [3] Eyquem, J., Mansilla-Soto, J., Giavridis, T., van der Stegen, S. J. C., Hamieh, M., Cunanan, K. M., Odak, A., Gönen, M. and Sadelain, M. Targeting a CAR to the TRAC locus with CRISPR/Cas9 enhances tumour rejection. Nature. 2017, 543(7643), pp. 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21405.
- [4] UMass Chan Medical School. CRISPR mechanism [Image]. Available from: https://www.umassmed.edu/contentassets/52f2c95b590a4365b5a10f9e321615dc/crispr-mechanism-block2.jpg (accessed 2 March 2026).
- [5] Zhang, Y. In situ CRISPR editing of neuroblastoma to enhance CAR-T cell recruitment via CXCL10 knock-in. Nature Communications. 2025, 16, p. 1234.
- [6] Alanis-Lobato, G. Frequent loss-of-heterozygosity and chromothripsis following CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nature Biotechnology. 2022, 40(1394–1404).
- [7] Rurik, J. G. In vivo generation of CAR-T cells using lipid nanoparticles targeting CD5. Science. 2024, 383(6680), pp. 291–298.
- [8] Quick Biology. Figure 1 CRISPR-Cas9 engineering of T cells in cancer patients [Image]. Available from: https://www.quickbiology.com/sites/default/files/u5/Figure%201%20CRISPR-Cas9%20engineering%20of%20T%20cells%20in%20cancer%20patients.png (accessed 2 March 2026).
- [9] Frangoul, H., Altshuler, D., Cappellini, M. D., Chen, Y.-S., Domm, J., Eustace, B. K., Foell, J., de la Fuente, J., Grupp, S. and Handgretinger, R. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021, 384(3), pp. 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2031054.
- [10] DeWitt, M. A., Magis, W., Bray, N. L., Wang, T., Berman, J. R., Urbinati, F., Heo, S.-J., Mitros, T., Muñoz, D. P., Boffelli, D., et al. Selection-free genome editing of the sickle mutation in human adult hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Science Translational Medicine. 2016, 8(360), pp. 360ra134-360ra134. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9336.
- [11] Wu, Y., Zeng, J., Roscoe, B. P., Liu, P., Yao, Q., Lazzarotto, C. R., Clement, K., Cole, M. A., Luk, K., Baricordi, C., et al. Highly efficient therapeutic gene editing of human hematopoietic stem cells. Nature Medicine. 2019, 25(5), pp. 776-783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0401-y.
- [12] Cappellini, M. D. Two-year follow-up of exagamglogene autotemcel in transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia. Blood Advances. 2023, 7(18), pp. 5123–5133.
- [13] Esrick, E. B. Two-year outcomes of exagamglogene autotemcel in severe sickle cell disease. Blood Advances. 2023, 7(18), pp. 5134–5143.
- [14] Liu, X. Base editing restores α-globin expression in non-deletion α-thalassemia. Nature Communications. 2023, 14, p. 7890.
- [15] Traxler, E. A. Fetal hemoglobin induction fails to rescue α-thalassemia due to α-chain dependency. Blood. 2022, 140(15), pp. 1692–1702.
- [16] Wang, L. Dual AAV-mediated delivery of split FVIII for hemophilia A gene therapy. Molecular Therapy. 2022, 30(4), pp. 1698-1710.
- [17] Yin, Z. Albumin locus-targeted integration of F8 using LNP-delivered CRISPR for hemophilia A. Nature Biotechnology. 2023, 41, pp. 1580–1589.
- [18] Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Lee, J. W., Essletzbichler, P., Dy, A. J., Joung, J., Verdine, V., Donghia, N., Daringer, N. M., Freije, C. A., et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science. 2017, 356(6336), pp. 438-442. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9321.
- [19] Chen, J. S. CRISPR-Cas13a-based platform for rapid influenza subtyping. Cell. 2020, 183(6), pp. 1671–1681.e10. .
- [20] Abdelrahman, Z. PAC-MAN: Prophylactic antiviral crispr in human cells against SARS-CoV-2. Nature Biotechnology. 2021, 39(38-40).
