Application of Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Clinical Decision-Making for Diabetes

Main Article Content

Hanyu Yang

Keywords

type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), artificial intelligence, large language models, clinical decision support system, machine learning, tongue image diagnosis

Abstract

The global prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and the complexity of its management pose significant challenges to traditional healthcare models. In recent years, the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies—particularly Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), and Large Language Models (LLMs)—has provided revolutionary tools for developing intelligent, precise, and personalized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS). This review systematically maps the application landscape of AI and LLMs across the full-cycle management of T2DM, covering the complete chain from risk prediction and precise diagnosis to individualized treatment and long-term prognosis management. In risk prediction, AI models significantly improve early identification of progression from prediabetes to T2DM, as well as diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular events, and other complications by integrating multidimensional data. At the diagnostic level, in addition to differential typing based on electronic health records, emerging studies have digitized traditional Chinese medicine tongue images and combined them with biomarkers such as oral-gut microbiota through multimodal machine learning, opening new pathways for non-invasive and objective auxiliary diagnosis. In treatment decision support, AI not only recommends glucose-lowering medications and optimizes insulin dosages but also predicts individualized postprandial glucose responses using continuous glucose monitoring data, offering possibilities for dynamic behavioral interventions. LLMs, exemplified by ChatGPT, demonstrate strong potential in interpreting clinical text, simulating doctor-patient communication, and generating preliminary management plans through their powerful natural language processing capabilities, although the reliability and safety of their independent decision-making still require cautious evaluation. Nevertheless, a substantial gap remains between technological advancement and clinical translation. This review further analyzes the core challenges currently faced, including data quality and algorithmic bias, the “black-box” nature of models and insufficient explainability, barriers to integration into clinical workflows, and profound medical ethical issues such as equity, privacy protection, and the risk of marginalizing human decision-making agency. Finally, the paper outlines future directions for the next generation of intelligent CDSS that integrate multimodal data, federated learning, causal inference, and human-centered design principles, emphasizing the need to strike a balance between technological innovation and ethical governance in order to build a safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy AI-empowered paradigm for diabetes management.

Abstract 30 | PDF Downloads 14

References

  • [1] Zueger, T., Schallmoser, S., Kraus, M., Saar-Tsechansky, M., Feuerriegel, S., & Stettler, C. (2022). Machine Learning for Predicting the Risk of Transition from Prediabetes to Diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 24(11), 842–847. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2022.0210.
  • [2] Leiherer, A., Schnetzer, L., Mink, S., Mader, A., Mündlein, A., Bermeitinger, B., Moissl-Blanke, A. P., März, W., Hammerer-Lercher, A., Kleber, M. E., & Drexel, H. (2026). Interpretable type 2 diabetes incidence prediction with AutoScore: A model based on standard clinical parameters. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 206, 106161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106161.
  • [3] Balasubramaniyan, S., Jeyakumar, V., & Nachimuthu, D. S. (2022). Panoramic tongue imaging and deep convolutional machine learning model for diabetes diagnosis in humans. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03879-4.
  • [4] Deng, J., Dai, S., Liu, S., Tu, L., Cui, J., Hu, X., Qiu, X., Jiang, T., & Xu, J. (2024). Application of tongue image characteristics and oral-gut microbiota in predicting pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes with machine learning. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 14, 1477638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1477638.
  • [5] Allen, A., Iqbal, Z., Green-Saxena, A., Hurtado, M., Hoffman, J., Mao, Q., & Das, R. (2022). Prediction of diabetic kidney disease with machine learning algorithms, upon the initial diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 10(1), e002560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002560.
  • [6] Wu, J., Gao, Q., Tian, M., Tan, S., Dong, J., & Wei, H. (2025). Explainable machine learning prediction of 1-year kidney function progression among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study. QJM : Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, 118(9), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf101.
  • [7] Tang, Y., Zheng, X., Yang, X., Guo, S., Luo, Q., Su, M., Chen, H., Zhou, W., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Liu, G., & Wang, L. (2025). Machine learning-based integration of pericoronary adipose tissue and clinical risk factors for cardiovascular risk prediction in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Medical Research, 30(1), 961. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03237-4. [8]Tsao, H. Y., Chan, P. Y., Su, E. C. Y. Predicting diabetic retinopathy and identifying interpretable biomedical features using machine learning algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics, 2018.
  • [8] Tsao, H. Y., Chan, P. Y., & Su, E. C. (2018). Predicting diabetic retinopathy and identifying interpretable biomedical features using machine learning algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics, 19 (Suppl 9), 283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2277-0.
  • [9] Cheheltani, R., King, N., Lee, S., North, B., Kovarik, D., Evans-Molina, C., Leavitt, N., & Dutta, S. (2022). Predicting misdiagnosed adult-onset type 1 diabetes using machine learning. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 191, 110029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110029.
  • [10] Shen, X., Ma, S., Vemuri, P., Castro, M. R., Caraballo, P. J., & Simon, G. J. (2021). A novel method for causal structure discovery from EHR data and its application to type-2 diabetes mellitus. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 21025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99990-7.
  • [11] Singla, R., Aggarwal, S., Bindra, J., Garg, A., & Singla, A. (2022). Developing Clinical Decision Support System using Machine Learning Methods for Type 2 Diabetes Drug Management. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 26(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_435_21.
  • [12] Nambiar, M., Bee, Y. M., Chan, Y. E., Ho Mien, I., Guretno, F., Carmody, D., Lee, P. C., Chia, S. Y., Salim, N. N. M., & Krishnaswamy, P. (2024). A drug mix and dose decision algorithm for individualized type 2 diabetes management. NPJ Digital Medicine, 7(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01230-5.
  • [13] Murphree, D. H., Arabmakki, E., Ngufor, C., Storlie, C. B., & McCoy, R. G. (2018). Stacked classifiers for individualized prediction of glycemic control following initiation of metformin therapy in type 2 diabetes. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 103, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.017.
  • [14] Johnston, S. S., Morton, J. M., Kalsekar, I., Ammann, E. M., Hsiao, C. W., & Reps, J. (2019). Using Machine Learning Applied to Real-World Healthcare Data for Predictive Analytics: An Applied Example in Bariatric Surgery. Value in Health : The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 22(5), 580–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.011.
  • [15] Thomsen, C. H. N., Kronborg, T., Hangaard, S., Vestergaard, P., & Jensen, M. H. (2025). Developing an AI-Based clinical decision support system for basal insulin titration in type 2 diabetes in primary Care: A Mixed-Methods evaluation using heuristic Analysis, user Feedback, and eye tracking. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 195, 105783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105783.
  • [16] Ying, Z., Fan, Y., Chen, C., Liu, Y., Tang, Q., Chen, Z., Yang, Q., Yan, H., Wu, L., Lu, J., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2025). Real-Time AI-Assisted Insulin Titration System for Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open, 8(5), e258910. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8910.
  • [17] Brügger, V., Kowatsch, T. & Jovanova, M. Predicting postprandial glucose excursions to personalize dietary interventions for type-2 diabetes management. Sci Rep 15, 25920 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08003-4.
  • [18] Harrison, R. M., Lapteva, E., & Bibin, A. (2024). Behavioral Nudging With Generative AI for Content Development in SMS Health Care Interventions: Case Study. JMIR AI, 3, e52974. https://doi.org/10.2196/52974.
  • [19] Jang, S. A., Kwon, S. J., Kim, C. S., Park, S. W., & Kim, K. M. (2025). Exploring the value of ChatGPT in selecting antidiabetic agents for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, 27(10), 5761–5771. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16630.
  • [20] Mondal, A., Naskar, A., Roy Choudhury, B., Chakraborty, S., Biswas, T., Sinha, S., & Roy, S. (2025). Evaluating the Performance and Safety of Large Language Models in Generating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management Plans: A Comparative Study With Physicians Using Real Patient Records. Cureus, 17(3), e80737. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80737.