Globalization and Localization of Subculture: Cultural Conflicts and Integration in the Overseas Expansion of Chinese Tactical Competitive Mobile Games
Main Article Content
Keywords
youth subculture globalization, localization adaptation, tactical competitive mobile games, cultural integration, cultural imperialism theory
Abstract
This study focuses on the globalization of Chinese tactical competitive mobile games, such as PUBG Mobile and Peacekeeper Elite, to explore how Chinese youth subculture achieves cross-cultural communication through gaming platforms. It analyzes cultural conflicts arising from symbol misinterpretation and value differences between Chinese youth subcultures and local cultures in Europe, America, and the Middle East. Adaptation strategies, including localized skin design and regional holiday events, are summarized to foster cultural integration. From the perspective of cultural imperialism theory, this research demonstrates how Chinese youth subculture maintains its subjectivity and enhances cultural soft power in global expansion. This study further argues that globalization does not lead to simple cultural domination but results in hybrid cultural forms through continuous interaction between global and local elements. It highlights the role of players as active agents who reinterpret and reshape cultural meanings within game environments. Additionally, the research emphasizes that successful localization depends on balancing cultural authenticity with market adaptability, providing a sustainable model for global cultural dissemination. It not only provides theoretical and practical references for Chinese youth subcultures to gain international recognition, but also offers insights into the global dissemination of Chinese digital cultural products and the international influence of youth subcultures.
References
- [1] Bennett, A. (2011). Youth subcultures in the digital age. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(5), 587-602.
- [2] Williams, D. (2019). Digital games as cross-cultural communication tools. Journal of Communication, 69(4), 789-810.
- [3] Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). The global expansion of Chinese tactical competitive mobile games: A cultural perspective. Chinese Journal of Communication, 16(2), 189-207.
- [4] Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
- [5] Schiller, H. I. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. International Arts and Sciences Press.
- [6] Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.
- [7] Chandler, D. (2006). Localization and globalization in digital games. Game Studies, 6(2), 1-18.
- [8] Barber, B. R. (1996). Jihad vs. McWorld: How globalism and tribalism are reshaping the world. Crown Publishers.
- [9] Pieterse, J. N. (2004). Globalization and culture: Global mélange. Rowman & Littlefield.
- [10] Buchanan, I. (2010). Cultural authenticity and localization in global media. Media, Culture & Society, 32(7), 1045-1061.
- [11] Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. Methuen.
- [12] Chen, L. (2021). Cross-cultural challenges of Chinese mobile games in global markets. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(4), 512-528.
- [13] Zhao, M. (2024). Cultural identity preservation in global game localization. Cultural Studies Quarterly, 38(1), 78-95.
- [14] Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
- [15] Humphreys, L. (2010). Empirical methodologies in game studies. Games and Culture, 5(3), 247-265.
- [16] Zhang, H., & Liu, Q. (2022). Sustainable globalization models for youth subculture: Balancing commercial and cultural values. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(5), 421-437.
