The Algorithmic Rentier: Value Extraction and the Reconfiguration of Creative Labor in the Era of Global Streaming Platforms

Main Article Content

Xiaoran Ma

Keywords

algorithmic rentier, streaming platforms, value extraction, creative labor, algo-torial power

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the global streaming wars, the audiovisual industry is undergoing a rapid transformation towards video-on-demand (VOD) platforms. Leading streaming platforms like Netflix have built massive digital infrastructure; however, behind the industry's prosperity lies a severe distribution crisis. This paper focuses on the logic of algorithmic rent, analyzing how transnational streaming platforms systematically extract value and restructure creative labor. It adopts the political economy of communication (PEC), integrating platform capitalism and algorithmic governance theories to construct an analytical framework for algorithmic rent. Through a literature review and the case study of Squid Game, it explores how algorithmic-editorial power, and the data black box achieve institutionalized deprivation. The core research questions include how financialization weakens creators' bargaining power through global buyout contracts, and how algorithmic discipline erodes the aesthetic autonomy of creative subjects. The study argues that platforms have become digital landlords extracting economic rents rather than partners. To achieve distributive justice, this paper proposes policy intervention strategies such as strengthening local investment quotas, legislating to guarantee the right to fair compensation, and establishing third-party data auditing mechanisms.

Abstract 5 | PDF Downloads 2

References

  • [1] Vlassis, A. (2023). Why to regulate Netflix: The cross-national politics of the audiovisual media governance in the light of streaming platforms. Media, Culture & Society, 45(7), 1511–1521.
  • [2] Yuan, C. (2023). A case study of Netflix’s marketing strategy. BCP Business & Management, 42, 184–189.
  • [3] Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137.
  • [4] deWaard, A. (2024). Derivative media: How Wall Street devours culture. University of California Press.
  • [5] Seaver, N. (2019). Captivating algorithms: Recommender systems as traps. Journal of Material Culture, 24(4), 421–436.
  • [6] Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
  • [7] Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292.
  • [8] Idiz, D. R., & Poell, T. (2025). Dependence in the online screen industry. Media, Culture & Society, 47(2), 375–393.
  • [9] Lotz, A. D. (2021). Media disrupted: Surviving pirates, cannibals, and streaming wars. MIT Press.
  • [10] Bonini, T., & Gandini, A. (2019). “First week is editorial, second week is algorithmic”: Platform gatekeepers and the platformization of music curation. Social Media + Society, 5 (4), 1–12.
  • [11] Bucher, T. (2019). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. In The social power of algorithms (pp. 30–44). Routledge.
  • [12] Senftleben, M., & Izyumenko, E. (2025). Author remuneration in the streaming age—exploitation rights and fair remuneration rules in the EU. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 20(12), 807–824.
  • [13] Jin, D. Y. (2023). Netflix’s effects on the Korean Wave: Power relations between local cultural industries and global OTT platforms. Asian Journal of Communication, 33(5), 452–469.