Institutional Innovation and Discourse Revolution: A Study on China’s Path in the Reform of Global Governance System
Main Article Content
Keywords
community of human destiny, global governance, system innovation, rule remodeling, China path
Abstract
In the context of profound changes in the global governance system, the international order is undergoing a structural transformation from unipolar hegemony to multi-polarization. This paper focuses on the practical path, theoretical innovation and global significance of China’s participation in the reconstruction of the international order. The research holds that China’s path presents distinct dual characteristics of “institutional innovation” and “discourse revolution.” Through institutional construction such as the expansion of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the BRICS countries, discourse transformation such as the Belt and Road Initiative and the Global Civilization Initiative, as well as the reshaping of rules such as digital economy and climate governance, a practical path with both adaptability and effectiveness has been formed. Based on the typical cases of Saudi-Iran reconciliation and vaccine supply, this paper demonstrates that China’s path creatively integrates the traditional and modern governance needs of civilization, and provides theoretical tools and practical reference for the countries of the global South to participate in the reconstruction of international order.
References
- Du, X. (2021). Providing new options for developing countries - Origins, design and innovation of AIIB. International Forum, vol. 23, no.3, pp. 59-78+157-158.
- Feng, L. and Huang, Y. (2023). Exploring new models of international cooperation in investment and financing from the perspective of global governance - Taking the AIIB and the New Development Bank as examples. Financial Theory and Practice, no.1, pp. 110-118.
- Gao, L. and Lv, Q. (2017). Discourse practice: international discourse construction and dissemination of the Belt and Road. Ningxia Social Sciences, no.6, pp. 152-156.
- Huang, Z. (2020). China's new comprehensive vision and far-sighted vision: the Belt and Road Initiative and the AIIB. Academic Monthly, vol. 52, no.7, pp. 93-104.
- Li, W. and Liu, H. (2023). China's Approach to Digital Trade Rule-Making. Internet World, no.9, pp. 2-8.
- Wang, S. (2024a). Research on the co-construction of high-quality development of the "Belt and Road" under the narrative logic of Chinese modernization. Future and development, vol. 48, no.6, pp. 14-18.
- Wang, Y. (2024b). When should the third-party mediator intervene in violent conflicts between countries ? - A case study of China's facilitation of the Saudi-Iranian reconciliation. International Security Studies, vol. 42, no.6, pp. 52-73+153-154.
- Xing, L. (2023). The external communication of Chinese civilization from the perspective of global civilization initiative. People's Forum · Academic Frontier, no.24, pp. 39-46.
- Xu, Q. (2023). Crisis, resilience and risk: Global climate governance under the paris agreement. International Political Research, vol. 44, no.5, pp. 62-82, 6.
- Xu, Y. and Huan, Q. (2021). The logical necessity and historical necessity of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Journal of Theory, no.4, pp. 14-22.
- Yu, X. and Tian, K. (2021). The dilemma, causes and countermeasures of the supply and distribution of novel coronavirus vaccines from the perspective of global public goods. Social Science Abstracts, no.9, pp. 19-21.
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.