Performative Sociality and Bounded Intimacy in Social Partner Relationships A Goffmanian Perspective
Main Article Content
Keywords
social partner relationships, dramaturgical theory, impression management, bounded intimacy, contemporary social interaction
Abstract
Postmodern society at present is increasingly fragmented in terms of inter-personal communication, functionalised, and emotionally shallow. The old form of a prolonged, emotionally rich relationship is being replaced by a more flexible and convenient relationship based on “mutual consideration”. Among the above new forms, social partner relationships have been particularly prevalent among young people, and they are organised around specific activities such as studying, exercising and consuming, rather than emotional closeness. In accordance with Goffman's dramatic theory, this paper will examine the relationship among social partners and observe how they present themselves to others, handle public attention, and keep their emotions concealed. Based on the above analysis, the relationships among social partners are generally highly formal in nature and are maintained by strict rules for boundary maintenance, emotion control, self-presentation selection and information restriction. Together, these mechanisms have created a kind of “limited closeness” that is both stable and functional, but not intimate. The above results further indicate that the reasons for changes in social partner relationships are also related to the whole society, such as a fast-paced life, digital communication and the need to reduce risk in social interactions. Although the links can provide functions such as reduced loneliness, flexible companionship, and easy social connections, they are also limited in their development of trust and empathy, and a stable long-term relationship cannot be established. They are also too dependent on consistent role performance and thus relatively weak when facing expectation gaps or disruptions to impression management.
References
- [1] Szasz, I. (2025). From Modernity to Postmodernity: A Paradigm Shift. RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, 9(1), 94-101.
- [2] Liang, Y. (2025). An analysis of the internet buzzword “XX Dazi”. Advances in Humanities Research, 12(6), 14-18.
- [3] Ytreberg, E. (2024). Erving Goffman (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. In Classics in Media Theory (pp. 84-95). Routledge.
- [4] Goffman, E. (2023). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 450-459). Routledge.
- [5] O’Boyle, N. (2022). Performers: Goffman’s dramaturgical perspective. In Communication Theory for Humans: Communicators in a Mediated World (pp. 103-125). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- [6] Okumdi, M. C., & Akporaro, A. C. (2022). Social interaction and social relations: A sociological analysis. Journal of sociology and social anthropology, 13(1-2), 13-1.
- [7] Kaplan, D. (2024). Performing identity or performing relationships? Rethinking performance theory in social media studies. Cultural Sociology, 18(4), 441-463.
- [8] Reza, A., Ilham, F., & Murdiono, W. (2024). The impact of social media on interpersonal relationships in the digital era. Journal Social Civilecial, 2(2), 64-77.
- [9] Bruineberg, J. (2025). Rethinking the cognitive foundations of the attention economy. Philosophical Psychology, 1-23.
- [10] Argyroudi, A., Roussos, P., & Kordoutis, P. (2025). Editorial to the Special Issue: Individuals, relationships and community in the digital era. Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 30(2), 229-232.
- [11] Antonilli, A. (2022). World risk society and Ulrich Beck’s manufactured uncertainties. Italian Sociological Review, 12(8S), 907-930.
- [12] Berkeley Exec Ed. (2026). The importance of connections on our well-being. Berkeley Executive Education Blog. https://executive.berkeley.edu/thought-leadership/blog/importance-connections-our-well-being
