Situational Teaching Approach and Oral English Fluency: A Case Study of Eighth-Grade Students

Main Article Content

Yongqi Hu

Keywords

situational teaching, junior high school English, oral fluency, oral proficiency

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the New Curriculum Standards, increasing emphasis has been placed on the development of junior high school students’ oral communicative competence, with oral fluency becoming a key indicator in evaluating comprehensive English proficiency. However, current teaching practices still tend to overemphasize grammatical accuracy while neglecting fluent language production. To address this issue, this study selected eighth-grade students from an educational training institution as research participants. Adopting a quasi-experimental design, students were divided into an experimental group and a control group, receiving situational teaching and traditional imitation-based instruction respectively. Data were collected through oral speaking tasks and questionnaires. The results revealed that students in the experimental group achieved significantly better oral fluency performance than those in the control group. Their composite oral fluency score (M = 19.25, SD = 2.78) was significantly higher than that of the control group (M = 17.38, SD = 2.91), with the difference reaching statistical significance (t = 2.138, df = 40, p = 0.039 < 0.05). Specifically, students in the experimental group demonstrated substantial improvements in speaking rate, pause frequency, and coherence of expression. These findings suggest that the situational teaching approach can effectively facilitate the development of English oral fluency among junior high school students. The study also provides empirical evidence and practical implications for educational institutions and public schools seeking to optimize oral English teaching models and enhance students’ communicative competence.

Abstract 14 | PDF Downloads 6

References

  • [1] Ministry of Education. (2022). Compulsory education English curriculum standards (2022 edition). Beijing Normal University Press.
  • [2] Liu, J., & Dang, J. (2015). A brief discussion on situational teaching in the context of the new curriculum reform—Based on Li Jilin’s thoughts on situational education. Liaoning Education, (8), 32–34.
  • [3] Hu. (2015). Preliminary exploration of situational teaching method in English. Speed Reading (Upper Decade), (12), 233.
  • [4] Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • [5] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • [6] Wang, J., Abdullah, R., & Leong, L. (2022). Studies of teaching and learning English-speaking skills: A review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.00000
  • [7] Zhu, J. (2019). Oral English teaching in junior high school. Charming China, (16), 70–71.
  • [8] Chen, Y., & Liu, A. (2013). A brief discussion on oral English teaching. Chinese Information, (12), 109.
  • [9] Zhao, L. (2025). A review of domestic research on English speaking teaching in the last decade (2015–2025): Visual analysis based on CiteSpace. Advances in Education, 15(11), 61–69.
  • [10] Qu. (2004). Factors affecting oral fluency and teaching advice. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology and Education, 14(2), 65–68.
  • [11] Yang, M. (2018). Teaching research on improving students’ oral English fluency. Theory and Practice of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(15), 25–26.
  • [12] Szyszka, M., Peltonen, P., & Lintunen, P. (2024). Unravelling the relationship between language anxiety and foreign language speech fluency in a monologue production. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 47(1), 323–337.
  • [13] Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
  • [14] Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
  • [15] Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
  • [16] LeBlanc, R. (1982). Littlewood, William. Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 38(4), 720–721.