How the Development of Financial Inclusion Reshapes Micro-foundations: An Analysis of the Impact on Corporate Investment and Financing
Main Article Content
Keywords
digital financial inclusion, investment and decisions, financing constraints, supply chain synergy, non-linear characteristics
Abstract
Against the backdrop of digital technology driving financial inclusion towards a deep integration into the data ecosystem, this paper comprehensively reviews cutting-edge domestic and international literature and constructs an integrated analytical framework to systematically clarify how it reshapes the investment and financing decisions of micro-level enterprises. Research shows that on the “financing side,” digital financial inclusion, relying on multi-dimensional data accumulation, breaks down information barriers between banks and enterprises, promoting a shift in the credit paradigm towards “data credit,” and substantially alleviating the financing constraints of SMEs. On the “investment side,” by optimizing corporate liquidity management and leveraging the credit penetration effect of the supply chain, it significantly reduces the cost of precautionary cash holdings, prompting corporate investment to shift from “defensive contraction” to long-term “synergistic expansion.” Further integration of cutting-edge literature reveals that this micro-reshaping effect exhibits significant structural heterogeneity in the technological innovation attributes, digital foundation, and business niche of enterprises. Simultaneously, when the supply of funds exceeds an appropriate boundary, the empowering effect of financial inclusion exhibits an inverted U-shaped nonlinear characteristic, inducing excessive corporate debt and “decoupling from the real economy.” This article systematically reveals the inherent transmission mechanism of “financing relief - investment activation”, providing solid theoretical support for the precise formulation of differentiated regulatory policies and the effective prevention of micro-level risks.
References
- [1]Ozili, P. K. (2021). Financial inclusion research around the world: A review. Forum for Social Economics, 50(4), 457–479.
- [2]Lima, L. (2019). Global mobility of microfinance policies. Policy and Society, 39(1), 19-35.
- [3]Mbiti, I., & Weil, D. N. (2011). Mobile banking: The impact of M-PESA in Kenya (NBER Working Paper No. 17129). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- [4]Gupta, K. (2023). Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: History and present impact. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 19(2), 21-27.
- [5]Guo, D., Li, L., & Pang, G. (2024). How does digital inclusive finance affect county’s common prosperity: Theoretical and empirical evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82, 340–358.
- [6]Zhang, J., Dong, X., & Li, J. (2022). Can digital inclusive finance promote common prosperity? Empirical research based on micro-household data. Journal of Finance and Economics, 48(7), 4–17.
- [7]Kou, G., & Lu, Y. (2025). FinTech: A literature review of emerging financial technologies and applications. Financial Innovation, 11(1), 1–34.
- [8]Cheng, M., & Qu, Y. (2020). Does bank FinTech reduce credit risk? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 63, 101398.
- [9]Liu, Y., Li, H., & Huang, H. (2022). Digital financial inclusion and corporate investment efficiency. China Economic Review, 76, 101859.
- [10]Guo, F., Wang, J., Wang, F., Kong, T., Zhang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Measuring China's digital financial inclusion: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly, 19(4), 1401-1418.
- [11]Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., Zetzsche, D. A., & Veidt, R. (2020). Sustainability, FinTech and financial inclusion. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(1), 7-35.
- [12]Tang, S., Wu, X., & Zhu, J. (2020). Digital finance and enterprise technology innovation: Structural feature, mechanism identification and effect difference under financial supervision. Management World, 36(5), 52-66.
- [13]Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., & Puri, M. (2020). On the rise of fintechs: Credit scoring using digital footprints. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(7), 2845-2897.
- [14]Gambacorta, L., Huang, Y., Li, Z., Qiu, H., & Chen, S. (2023). Data versus collateral. Review of Finance, 27(2), 369–398.
- [15]Qu, X., & Zhu, B. (2023). Digital finance and corporate cash-holding strategy: Organizational heterogeneity and strategic transmission channels. Sustainability, 15(3), 2361.
- [16]Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Geng, L. (2024). Digital finance, financing constraints and supply chain resilience. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103545.
- [17]Gu, N., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., & Fu, C. (2025). Does digital finance foster corporate innovation? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 88, 1502–1524.
- [18]Li, C., Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Wang, Z., & Mardani, A. (2023). Digital finance and enterprise financing constraints: Structural characteristics and mechanism identification. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114074.
- [19]Zhang, M., Yao, Q., & Yang, Y. (2024). Digital finance and corporate breakthrough innovation: Evidence from China. PLoS ONE, 19(7), e0305596.
- [20]Wang, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). Digital transformation, digital finance and corporate investment efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 62, 105156.
- [21]Zhang, P., Wang, J., Li, M., & Xiao, F. (2025). Digital infrastructure and economic growth: Evidence from corporate investment efficiency. International Review of Economics & Finance, 98, 103854.
- [22]Wang, S., & Li, J. (2023). The bidirectional relationship between digital finance and corporate green innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(21), 59458-59473.
- [23]Shen, Y., Hu, W., & Hueng, C. J. (2023). The inverted U-shaped relationship between digital finance and corporate innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 352-367.
