Analysis of the Quantitative Transmission Mechanism of Climate Risk in Green Financial Asset Pricing
Main Article Content
Keywords
climate risk, asset pricing, green finance, climate risk
Abstract
With the deepening of global climate governance and low-carbon transformation, the “green attribute” of green financial assets has broken through the traditional reputation premium category, gradually achieving quantitative pricing through three core channels: carbon premium, climate scenario discount, and default structure, and transforming into tradable additional rates of return or interest spreads. This article systematically reviews high-level literature at home and abroad, discusses the theoretical logic, empirical evidence, and transmission mechanism of the three major quantitative channels, analyzes the correction path of climate risk on traditional asset pricing models, explores the controversies and challenges in current pricing practices, and looks forward to future research directions. Research has found that the physical and transitional dimensions of climate risk have been deeply embedded in the valuation system of green financial assets, with carbon cost internalization, scenario dynamic discounting, and default risk reconstruction becoming the core pricing logic. However, issues such as insufficient data standardization and model heterogeneity still constrain quantification accuracy. This article aims to provide literature support for the improvement and practical application of green financial asset pricing theory, and to assist in the market-oriented pricing of climate risks in finance.
References
- [1]Bank for International Settlements (BIS). 2022. Climate Risk and Financial Asset Pricing Report.
- [2]Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. 2021. Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
- [3]Bua, G., et al. 2022. Climate-Adjusted CAPM: Evidence from Global Green Energy Stocks. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Janeway Institute.
- [4]Daniel, K. D., Litterman, R. B., & Wagner, G. 2019. Applying Asset Pricing Theory to Calibrate the Price of Climate Risk. NBER Working Paper.
- [5]Flammer, C. 2021. Corporate Green Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
- [6]Hachenberg, B., & Schiereck, D. 2018. Liquidity and market efficiency of green bonds. Journal of Asset Management, 19(6), 371–384.
- [7]Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021. Sixth Assessment Report.
- [8]London School of Economics. 2025. Long term robustness study on carbon price and asset return advantages. London: LSE Research.
- [9]Lv, H. L., Xu, S., Huang, Z., & Ni, Z. X. 2022. Carbon efficiency and green premium: empirical evidence from the green bond market. Accounting Research, (8), 106-120.
- [10]NGFS. 2025. Central Bank Climate Scenario Analysis Guidelines (2025 Update).
- [11]Romagnoli, S., & Santini, A. 2025. Climate risk and sovereign debt: country-level exposures and scarcity effects in green bonds. Decisions in Economics and Finance.
- [12]Stern, N. 2016. The structure of economic modeling of climate change: A review of the stern review. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 519–541.
- [13]The People's Bank of China. 2025. Research Report on Green Credit and Climate Risk Pricing.
- [14]Weitzman, M. L. 2012. Prices vs. quantities for climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(1), 1–15.
