The Nonlinear Impact of Climate Physical Risk on Bank Non-Performing Loan Ratios: Evidence from Chinese Listed Banks
Main Article Content
Keywords
climate physical risk, non-performing loan ratio, nonlinear effect, inverted u-shaped relationship
Abstract
The frequent occurrence of extreme weather exacerbates the threat of climate physical risks to financial stability. However, whether its impact on bank credit risk follows a simple linear pattern remains unclear. Based on the unbalanced panel data of 28 listed banks in China from 2010 to 2023, this paper tests the nonlinear effect of extreme precipitation on the non-performing loan rate. The results indicate a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between extreme precipitation and the non-performing loan rate, that is, the initial physical loss pushes up the risk of default, and the non-performing rate falls after exceeding the threshold, which may be affected by post-disaster policy buffering and other factors. The U-test formally confirms that the inverted U-type relationship is established within the data range (p=0.015). The effect is most significant in the two lag periods and concentrated in small banks. Large banks did not show a significant nonlinear effect due to the high degree of business dispersion. Further analysis found that small banks in areas with higher insurance coverage exhibit a more pronounced inverted U-shaped pattern, which is consistent with the theoretical expectation that insurance compensation plays a buffering role. After multiple verification of hybrid OLS, fixed effect, wild cluster bootstrap and multi-phase lag combined regression, the conclusion is robust. This study provides new micro-level evidence for the nonlinear boundaries of climate risk transmission to the banking system.
References
- [1]Noth, F., & Schüwer, U. (2023). Natural disasters and bank stability: Evidence from the US financial system. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 119, Article 102792.
- [2]Chabot, M., & Bertrand, J. L. (2023). Climate risks and financial stability: Evidence from the European financial system. Journal of Financial Stability, 69, Article 101190.
- [3]Zaiane, S., & Semenova, M. (2026). Climate risk and bank liquidity creation in the MENA region: A dual threshold–quantile approach. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1–22.
- [4]Cortés, K. R., & Strahan, P. E. (2017). Tracing out capital flows: How financially integrated banks respond to natural disasters. Journal of Financial Economics, 125(1), 182–199.
- [5]Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.
- [6]Guo, Y. T. (2024). Effectively responding to climate-related financial risks. China Finance, (12), 62–63.
- [7]Xue, Z., Zhu, S., & Fu, H. (2026). The impact of climate physical risks on risk-taking of Chinese small and medium-sized banks: Transmission mechanism and heterogeneity. International Review of Economics & Finance, Article 105126.
- [8]Liu, X., Liu, J., & Hao, Y. (2024). Climate change shocks and credit risk of financial institutions: Evidence from China’s commercial banks. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 60(7), 1392–1406.
- [9]Hou, L. (2025). The effects of extreme weather on non-performing loans: Evidence from China’s banking sector. Applied Economics Letters, 1–5.
- [10]Deng, C., Han, M., Luo, J., & Zhang, J. (2025). The impact of weather shocks on rural credit cooperatives. Finance Research Letters, 75, Article 106872.
- [11]Liu, T. (2025). Save the farms: Nonlinear impact of climate change on banks’ agricultural lending. Climatic Change, 178(4), Article 65.
- [12]Wang, J., Ma, Q., Wang, C., & Sheng, T. (2024). Climate change and credit risk in rural financial institutions: A study based on transition risk. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(6), 4208–4226.
- [13]Guo, K., Ji, Q., & Zhang, D. (2024). A dataset to measure global climate physical risk. Data in Brief, 54, Article 110502.
