Raising Taxes on the Wealthy to Reduce Income Inequality: International Evidence and Policy Implications for Malaysia

Main Article Content

Linhao Wang

Keywords

income inequality, progressive taxation, Malaysia, social mobility, fiscal policy

Abstract

Rising income inequality has renewed interest in progressive taxation as a redistribution tool. This paper reviews international evidence on the relationship between taxing the wealthy and reducing income inequality, with a focus on policy implications for Malaysia. Drawing on theoretical foundations such as the Matthew effect and optimal tax theory, the review synthesizes findings from developed and developing economies, including Belgium, Brazil, and Nordic countries. The analysis shows that well-designed progressive tax systems, combined with efficient public spending, can reduce Gini coefficients and improve social mobility without stifling economic growth. Key mechanisms include fiscal transfers, education and health investments, and conditional cash transfer programs like Bolsa Família. However, critics argue that high taxes may trigger capital flight and reduce innovation incentives. The review finds that such risks are often mitigated by strong institutions, infrastructure, and human capital. For Malaysia, which currently has a maximum tax rate of 30% and significant wealth concentration (top 1% holding 40% of wealth) [1], the evidence supports progressive tax reforms that fund public services and break intergenerational poverty cycles. Policy implications include raising top marginal rates, improving tax enforcement, and linking revenues to inclusive development programs.

Abstract 15 | PDF Downloads 6

References

  • [1]World Bank. (2023). World Development Report 2023. World Bank Publications.
  • [2]International Monetary Fund. (2025). FISCAL MONITOR Spending Smarter: How Efficient and Well-Allocated Public Spending Can Boost Economic Growth. International Monetary Fund.
  • [3]Enache C. (2024 June 26). The High Cost of Wealth Taxes. Tax Foundation; Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/eu/wealth-tax-impact/
  • [4]Pozen R. C. (2011 September 27). The Myth of Corporate Tax Reform. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-myth-of-corporate-tax-reform/
  • [5]Hasell J. (2023). Income inequality before and after taxes: how much do countries redistribute income? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/income-inequality-before-and-after-taxes
  • [6]Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2025 January 28). Policy Basics: Where Do Our Federal Tax Dollars Go? Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/where-do-our-federal-tax-dollars-go
  • [7]Tharpe W. (2019 February 5). Raising State Income Tax Rates at the Top a Sensible Way to Fund Key Investments. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/raising-state-income-tax-rates-at-the-top-a-sensible-way-to-fund-key
  • [8]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Tax Policy Reforms 2024.