Banks as Supply Chain Risk Managers: A Management-Oriented Review

Main Article Content

Siyu Liu

Keywords

supply chain risk, supply chain finance, banks, financial intermediation, system risk

Abstract

This paper explores the importance of banks in defining supply chain risk at a management and system-level. Although the existing literature has mainly concentrated on the efficiency of the supply chain and financial intermediation, little has been done on the role of banks in shaping risk dynamics in interrelated production networks. This gap is filled in this paper through the conceptualization of banks as active participants in supply chains and not as passive providers of capital. Based on the literature on banking, supply chain management, and organizational theory, the study determines three important mechanisms by which banks affect supply chain risk: financial, informational, and governance mechanisms. These processes influence the way liquidity is distributed, the transmission of risks, and responses of firms to uncertainty in supply networks. The results indicate the duality of banks as stabilizers and amplifiers of supply chain risk. In normal circumstances, banks make the banking system resilient through liquidity provision and coordination of the firms. Banks can however limit credit during times of financial strain, causing liquidity crises and ripple effects throughout supply chains. In general, the research adds to the literature by uniting the financial and management viewpoints and highlighting the significance of a system-level approach to the concept of supply chain risk.

Abstract 18 | PDF Downloads 8

References

  • [1]Acharya, V. V. (2009). A theory of systemic risk and the design of prudential bank regulation. Journal of Financial Stability, 5(3), 224–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2009.02.001
  • [2]Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2002). Small business credit availability and relationship lending: The importance of bank organisational structure. The Economic Journal, 112(477), F32–F53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00682
  • [3]Gelsomino, L. M., Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A., Tumino, A., & Ellinger, A. (2016). Supply chain finance: A literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2014-0173
  • [4]Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904–2915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727
  • [5]Ioannou, I., & Demirel, G. (2022). Blockchain and supply chain finance: A critical literature review at the intersection of operations, finance and law. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 6(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-022-00040-1
  • [6]Dong, L., & Zhang, M. (2023). A review of research on blockchain empowered supply chain financing in China. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v13i3.386
  • [7]Boissay, F., & Gropp, R. (2013). Payment defaults and interfirm liquidity provision. Review of Finance, 17(6), 1853–1894. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs045
  • [8]Wieland, A., & Durach, C. F. (2021). Two perspectives on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12271